Anthology of Plagiarism

[FOMIN]

"P.A.Shkludov lies every time , when he opens his mouth, with his tongue hanging out and drooling profusely " , - M. Lepshich
_______________________________
The plagiarist writes: a draughts game composition is not subject to copyright.
********************************

An aswer from internet :
A draughts composition is indeed a copyrightable object, unlike a regular draughts game.

By definition, a draughts composition is a form of creativity, historically developed from the practice of draughts, the purpose of which is to express artistic ideas in draughts form.

For a draughts composition to be recognized as a copyrightable object, two main criteria must be met:

The creative nature of the composition. A draughts composition creates new combinations of known ideas and concepts, which fully meets the criteria of creative activity.

An objective form of expression. Compositions are expressed through draughts notations and diagrams, which satisfies the requirements for the material embodiment of the work.

Important features of a draughts composition as a copyrightable object:

Compositions must meet mandatory requirements: completeness and legality of the initial position, solvability, and uniqueness of the solution.

Artistic requirements include unity of form and content, harmonious correspondence between the conceptual design and the means of implementation, expressiveness of the concept, economy of form, and beauty of the solution.

Unlike draughts games, which are not protected by copyright, draughrs compositions are the result of creative work aimed at creating new artistic ideas in draights form. This allows them to be classified as copyrighted works and provided with the corresponding legal protection.

Therefore, draughts compositions, unlike regular draughts games, are fully protected by copyright because they meet all the necessary legal criteria and represent the result of creative work.

adding a black checker to cell " b2 " results to a worse game in variation A and is a form of plagiarism.


This diagram was formed by A. Fomin on August of 6, 2025 at 17:11 Moscow time. It was published in the same time on the forum "Myth":
Solution : d8 (f4), h2 (c7), h6 (b2)-A.Zenchenkov, 1911 , c1 (a1) , cf4 (a:g3), h:f4 x

17544894757.png (5.96 KiB) Viewed 27368 times

This diagram was conceived on the morning of August 6, 2025 and created by A. Fomin on August of 6, 2025 at 19:30 Moscow time. It was also published in the same time on the forum "Myth" .

Solution: e3, b4, b8, c1(g5), h6 (b2) , c1 (a1), f4, f4 x
After some time, a next plagiarism by mr. P. Shkludov appears in internet :
..
Solutions: b8(a3), e3, e7, c1(f4), h6 - A. Zenchenkov , 1911 - (b2), c1(a1), f4, f4+
b8(g5), e3, e7, c1(f4), h6 - A. Zenchenkov, 1911 - (b2), c1(a1), f4, f4+
In all cases, Mr. P. Shkludov not only does not provide a link to the original source of the borrowing, but almost completely repeats the content of the author's works from the original source. P. Shkludov only gives a hint of the "original source" from parallel worlds.
Ps: Plagiarism producer writes::

[FOMIN]

There was published before :
bb3/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=8464&sid=0426c ... 30#p132958
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post by FOMIN » Sun Nov 27, 2022 21:43
A Fomin (new compositions )
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16699606412.png
1.ed2 ab2 2 cd6 a:e7 3.dc3 b:d4 4.fe5 d:f6 5.gh6 bc7
6.h:b8 dc7 7.b:g7 h:f6 8.hg3 fe5 9.gf4 e:g3 10.h:f2 x :

image_handler - 2025-08-21T065846.112.png (5.87 KiB) Viewed 26996 times

After some time, Mr. P. Shkludov, under his own name, publishes plagiarism on his forum, where he is the administrator.

https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16699897974.png

Solution :1.dc5 2.gh6 x
The creator of the supposedly new work is aware of the fact, to put it mildly, of borrowing when he mentions in Russian about parallel worlds .
The amateur arranger did not create anything new, having published under his own name a primitive approach for creation to someone else's final motif, which was a fragment of a combination of the original source.

[FOMIN]

There was published before :
viewtopic.php?p=132958#p132958
A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16700436519.png
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16700422835.png
.
D. No. 2 1. gf6 2.bc7 3. e7 4. d8 5.b6 c3 6. a5 b2 7. c3 8. d2 g5 9. e3 10. e3 h4 11. f4 x
The most probable primary source that Mr. Shkludov adhered to is shown in diagram 2. Having seen the publication placed by the author in diagram No. 2, P. Shkludov immediately began to modify A. Fomin's idea to his advantage. The author was forced to immediately take measures to stop the plagiarism attempt, for which he posted both equivalent versions under his name. The author had 7 days to stop the plagiarism attempt, after which moderation of what had already been published became unavailable.
It is noteworthy that P. Shkludov deliberately does not indicate the original source of his new creation, which means concealing an attempt at plagiarism.

*****************************
f6, e7, e7, d8, b6 (c3), a5(b2), c3, d2(c7), e3, e3 x
Sometimes later Mr. P. Shkludov at his forum published plagiarism..
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16697276536.png
At the same time, P. Shkludov admits in Russian that this work of his comes from parallel worlds.

How is this not an obvious provocation and trolling?

image_handler - 2025-08-21T221806.103.png (4.72 KiB) Viewed 26905 times

[FOMIN]

This is a work by P. Shkludov from the republican contest "Odessa-1989", No. 681
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17559521256.png
Solution: fe3 gh2, bc7 hg1?? [(...fe5! ), d8 (hg1) = ], b:g7, ef4 , cd4, h:d88x

image_handler - 2025-08-23T152923.312.png (5.86 KiB) Viewed 26799 times

In addition the insolubility in position No. 681 by P. Shkludov, there is also a close predecessor : A. Fomin [("64"-21-1981, 9-th Moscow Championship, 1982 (6.5 points)], to whom the so-called follower tried unsuccessfully to attach himself.

bc7, ab8 (ba3)Vp1 [Vp1 ..(dc5), ba7 I (ba3),a7:h8, hg7 etc. x] b:h8, hg7! , gf4, h:d8 x
I ba3 ? (bc3) , ba7 (cb4) , a:c5 (ed6)! , c:g5 (cb2) , gh6 (ba1) =
Other interesting variations of the author's idea are published here (link):
viewtopic.php?p=125778#p125778
Please, see d. d. No. No. 7 , 10
№498 (1) ...........A. Fomin ......№498 (4).....
...
№498 (1) : 1.cd8 de3 2.db6(e:c1) 3.b:g7!! (c:h6) 4.ed2(h:c1) 4.hg3(f:h6) 5.gf4 (c:g5) 6.h:d8 x
№498 (4) :1 de5 (f:d4) 2.ef4 (g:e5) 3.dc3 (d:b2) 4.a:h8 (bc1) 5.fg3 (c:h6) 6.ed2(h:c1) 7.hg7 (f:h6) 8.gf4 (c:g5) 9.h:d8 x

[FOMIN]

P. Shkludov wrote :

Re: Petr Shkludov, 2021
 Admin Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:40 am
P.Shkludov, 2021

1.
g5, ab2, e5, b2, - A.Nagumanov, 1983 - b8(g5 A), a7(c3), d2, f2, f8, c5(h2), g1+ A(f6), e5(e3), h8(f2), g3, g3, e5+
The combination itself seems to suggest itself... It probably was before. If not with this endgame, then with another. Or maybe with this one.
Here, for example, this position was definitely composed "300 years ago":
ab2+

Dmitry Kamchitsky reports in the topic "Evening bell from D.K." on the forum "Myth" :
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16347409349.png
V. Svizinsky : 19th All-Soviet Union contest -1985 on drafts composition (score=7, 5 points)
c5 a3 (c5) b2, ac3, c1, b2, b8 - further Nagumanov 1983 - b2, b8 ... X.

image_handler - 2025-08-24T044859.025.png (3.88 KiB) Viewed 26775 times

*********************

Ps: Usually, when a person suspects that his work is not original, he does not put his name above the diagram. Master Alexander Kogotko wrote about this: «P. Shkludov constantly shows off: I am a mountain! I am higher than the mountains!:»
V. Svizinsky's composition took part in the 6th USSR Championship on drafts composition (1987), where it received a unanimous score of 8 points from three judges.
(comment by author of this message).

[FOMIN]

Evening bell from the D. K. (cultural center)
 author ANTEK Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:43 pm

P. Skludov wrote:
processing of one composition by V. Stepanov:

image_handler - 2025-08-24T090129.068.png (6.02 KiB) Viewed 26756 times

D. Kamchitsky answered :
"This position participated in contest "Republic ", 2004 (author is A. Kogotko)
In addition, this "problema" is a fragment of the composition by Yury Chernyaev , published in "Shashki"-mag. No. 1-1980 , and at the same time it is a deterioration ".
Yu. Chernyaev :5-th USSR championship on drafts composition, 1983 (score=7, 5 points)

1.h6 2.a7 g7 3.e5 a1 4.g1 f6 5.b2 6.g3 7.h8 x
See also above the miniature by V. Guzikov .

[FOMIN]

On July 3rd this year, P. Shkludov noticed a publication by A. Fomin, in this forum which combined a well-known combination with a rare final motive. In this situation, the so-called " arranger " moved the black checker in Fomin's composition from the b6 square to c7 and illegally declared this variation, which does not represent anything new, to himself. It is curious that in this situation P. Shkludov considers himself the author of the pictur on the checkers board , but his declaration looks like a performance by a circus artist, and not the inventor of a new work. A clear manifestation of plagiarism combined with trolling.

Solution : 1.ab4 c1 2.ed2 3.d:f4 4.h:a5 hg5 5.ad2 gh4 6.df4 ab6 7.ab2 bc5 8.bc3 ba7 9.fh2 ab6 10.hg1 hg3 12.cd4 c:e3 13.g:a7 gh2 14.cg1 x
*************************
*************************
Some times later P. Shkludov responds to the claim against him regarding plagiarism::

Shkludov never claimed rights to Fomin's picture.
But for some reason Fomin claims rights to Shkludov's picture.
We are not talking about the authorship of the work.
We are talking about copyright.
However, as it turned out, copyright does not apply with regards to the checkers composition.
Copyright applies to artistic images - paintings, photographs.
Based on this, we can only talk about the authorship of the picture on the board.
A preventive measure was chosen against the Plagiarist: an equivalent variation with a black checker on the c7 cell instead of b6 was published under the name of the real author.

This Shkludov's statement no longer looks like the performance of a circus artist, but rather like the statement of an hypocrite exclusively .
As evidence of the presented material, we provide a scan of P. Shkludov's response from the Planet forum (see below)

1.de5 2.dc7 etc.x

[FOMIN]

There was published before : :
A. Fomin: No. 202 , "Checkers Bulletin" KZShS FSHR, 2 - 2021
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/14977873473.png

1.ab6 2.f2 (ef6) 3.fe3 3.dc7 4.c:e7 (a3) 5.hg3 6.g1 7.d4 x
A year later, P. Shkludov, based on A. Fomin’s ptoblem publishes plagiarism on his forum.
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/14979490533.png
However, this plagiarism turns out to be not only a worse on form and content compared to its ideological predecessor by Fomin , but even a copy of the original of someone else's work (" ,Shashki" , No. 2-1989 ) , printed in this journal.

image_handler - 2025-08-25T161923.896.png (6.39 KiB) Viewed 26715 times

[FOMIN]

This composition was published on December 21, 2022 :
............A.Fomin ...........
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16722064728.png
Please see below:
viewtopic.php?p=133019#p133019

image_handler - 2025-09-06T190001.276.png (5.15 KiB) Viewed 26535 times

After some time, P. Shkludov publishes plagiarism on his forum, not embarrassed to mention that his craft was made on the basis of information from so called parallel worlds.
The plagiarist by re-dier of some else work appropriated also it for himself containing two original optionsIn order to ensure compliance with the copyright law, first published in the Code of the USSR of draughts game in 1986 , a preventive measure was applied to the Plagiarist by confiscating his variation of someone else's work and transferring it to the real author.
It is no coincidence that the champion of plagiarism in draughts composition P. Shkludov is called a bully of geese.

The plagiarist admitted that he appropriated someone else's pie 3 after hours it was made by the author of the two-variant compisition , having organized the theft of A. Fomin's work..The plagiarist also confirmed his worthlessness in fields of draughtsccompisition - his inability to work independently for several decades. For such things, in the USSR, the Plagiarist would have long been disqualified for a long time, up to life. It was precisely this type of sanctions that Plsgiarist proposed on the eve of the General Assembly of the FMJD-2015; to the President of the draughts Russia Federation Anatoly Nikitin (for exposing him the fraudulent activities of the subsequently dissolved false commission CPI FMJD).
Ps: The measure of restraint for the plagiarist was the confiscation of someone else's pie that he had stolen.

[FOMIN]

A primitive positional approach to a well-known final motive. Black's last move in the position of proving "legality" contradicts common sense. Combination play for whites is almost absent, since a primitive 2x2 exchange checkers cannot be considered a serious combination.. Such a "composition" in the genre of miniatures is a striking example of epigonism and positional problems. This idea is much better implemented by its ideological predecessor.
Despite the presence of a black checker that is unsuccessfully placed on the second horizontal, the rather complex combination of the predecessor allows him to appear as a strong one.
Ps: The epigonic remake followed on the Internet two days after predecessor .
Mr. P. Shkludov's imitative style deprived him of the opportunity to achieve the title of master in the Soviet times. And those diplomas and certificates that were issued by someone in the new 21st century are not considered legitimate by the Ministry of Sport of Russia and the Republic of Belarus Ministry . More precisely, the Ministry of Sports of the Republic of Belarus does not consider checkers composition to be a sport at all. The organized group of random people so called as CPI FMJD who did not have any referee certificates or official credentials to judge checker composition competitions was dissolved at the General Assembly of the FMJD in October 2017.
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16705905591.png
b6, c7, c3, e7, f4(g5), d4 (b4), b8(a3), f4(b2(, c1(a1), f4, f4 x

image_handler - 2025-09-08T095626.903.png (5.38 KiB) Viewed 26123 times

viewtopic.php?p=135060#p135060
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board

[FOMIN]

Exactly one year ago, the author of this post published an original miniature with a sacrifice of a white king in two versions on an this forum :
bb3/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=8464&start=105#p134517
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post by FOMIN » Fri Sep 20, 2024 15:4
Evidential position No. 1252(A)

image_handler - 2025-09-10T031506.552.png (5.09 KiB) Viewed 25751 times

The Plagiarist saw solution of this "problema" after the moves 1 gf6 a:c7 2.ab8 and brazenly appropriated this fragment of author composition. A striking example of the fraudulent actions that led to the fall of the so-called CPI FMJD committee, dissolved by the General Assembly of the FMJD in October 2017 , where the said gentleman was deprived of the post of the grey cardinal of this committee of international impostors. After almost 35 years since the collapse of the USSR , the Plagiarist once again stuck, to a foreign intellectual property, since he was not able to do anything significant on his own, to achieve the title of master of sports in draughts or draughrs composition.
No. 1252 (B) A. Fomin (fragment)
 
1.ab8 cd6 A , b 2.b:e5 ab2 3.ed6 c:g5 4.f:c1 gf4 5.cd2 c:g3 6.h:f2 x
A 1..ab2 2.b:d6 c:g5 3.e:c1 gf4 4.cd2 c:g3 5.h:f2 x
b 1...b6 2.hg5 !   and black in zugzwang 2...ba5 3.be5 x
There was known before :
d. №2 P. Shkludov 14th Moscow draughts composition Championship, 1987, 5.5 points

1.fe5 ab2 2.ed6 c:g5  3.e:c1 gf4 4.cd2 e:g3 5.h:f2 x
Chief Judge A. Fedoruk writes a review of A. Winderman's judging: "The score is too high."
M. Tsvetov points out in the topic "Classical compositions.." 12/7/2013 on the "Mif"-forum with the comment: "A. Vinderman was liberal: A. Vinderman's memory just failed him a little, there is a significant I.P. > Shashki-7-78 M. Tsvetov " .

e7 (c5), f4, c3 (f6),;cd4, h:f4 x
...................................
The judges of the 7th USSR Championship decided to reject P. Shkludov's "masterpiece" for a far-fetched reason (unsolvability), but the situation was very simple. This masterpiece is a positional "problema " : after a banal exchange of 2x3 on the board, the ending of M. Tsvetov appears with its displacement down the board. As for the miniature of mr. P. Shkludov , there is no combination in it, but there is a kind of one-move "maneuver" according to the classification of the same judge A. Winderman. In the rules of draights composition in hundred cells board it is written: "a combination game is sacrifices of white checkers". And where are the sacrifices of white checkers in P. Shkludov miniature ?
M. M. Botvinnik writes in his book "Analytical and critical works", 1987: the exchange of a knight for a bishop is not a combination. A combination is a forced variation with a sacrifice. In P. Shkludov's miniature there are no victims at all, but there is an exchange. Another exchange occurs already in the ending (final motive or simply in the ending). In A. Fomin's miniature there is a victim of the white king and in two versions.
The International Shemyakinsky Court recognized P. Shkludov's encroachment on someone else's intellectual property as a relapse of plagiarism.

The plagiarist has adopted demagogy: he has taken a fragment of an evidentiary position by A. Fomin that was published before all subsequent variations and appropriated this fragment for himself. In order to conceal plagiarism, the "amateur artist" deliberately kept silent about the time of creation of the evidentiary position by A. Fomin , obviously counting on a scandalous response from the real author, but he miscalculated.
Ps: Lacking diplomas, medallions and commercial successes at the Vanity Fair of draughts composition , the whiner turned to judge Valery Yacheykin with a request to drag him by the ears to first place in the 1991 Belarusian Championship. In case of refusal, intending to end the pomposity in fields of draughts composition with the way by suicide.

[FOMIN]

There was published before : :
A. Fomin: No. 202 , "Checkers Bulletin" KZShS FSHR, 2 - 2021
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/14977873473.png

1.ab6 2.f2 (ef6) 3.fe3 3.dc7 4.c:e7 (a3) 5.hg3 6.g1 7.d4 x
A year later, P. Shkludov, based on A. Fomin’s ptoblem publishes plagiarism on his forum.
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/14979490533.png
However, this plagiarism turns out to be not only a worse on form and content compared to its ideological predecessor by A.Fomin , but even a copy of the original of someone else's work (" ,Shashki" , No. 2-1989 ) , printed in this journal.
image_handler - 2025-08-25T161923.896.png

Improvement: position from the game S. Pupkin- P. Vodkulsh
gh6,fe7, de7 f:d4 Vp1,hg3 h:g1, g:f6 x Vp1...(f:d6),h:g1, hg3, g:f6 x
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17575802951.png
there should be a black checker g3 on the diagram
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17576706411.png

17575802951.png (5.25 KiB) Viewed 25731 times

************************************
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17575602663.png
There should be a black checker a5 on the diagram
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17576707936.png

17575602663.png (5.19 KiB) Viewed 25737 times

[FOMIN]

There was known before
viewtopic.php?p=134703#p134703
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post by FOMIN » Thu Dec 19, 2024 01:36
№1262-I :
.
1.f8 f2 2.b4 ! 3.b6 4.cd2 ! hg3 5.ba7 etc. x - futher S. Ustianov -15-th Moscow championship,1988
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
viewtopic.php?p=134716#p134716
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post by FOMIN » Thu Dec 26, 2024 10:51

1.d6 2.e7 3.b4! 4.b6 5.cd2! etc. x according to the endgame of Mr. S. Ustianov, 1988
Also there was published before :
A. Katiuha ("contest 64-pwcp-2 -2016 ")
This competition was organized by P. Shkludov in alliance with his sponsor V. Shulga

1 bc5 etc. x

There is a new composition
A. Lukianov and A. Fomin
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17581456011.png

17581456011.png (6.04 KiB) Viewed 13735 times

********************
This is plagiarism in the edition of P. Shkludov.

***********************************

[FOMIN]

A story about how P. Shkludov plagiarizes other people's works .

This is an original of the author's work. No. 17(1160) https://imageup.ru/img128/4702703/scree ... 0816_1.jpg
A. Fomin January 17, 2024
https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1662-topic#78206
Draughts party and Composition
Post by Fomin January 17, 2024 at 12:26 am
Position after the move 1.cb2
The position on the diagram comes from the analysis of the batch that the author of this post received in January 2024 in the memorial on checkers was organized to a remembrance of V. Safronov.

bb3/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=8358&start=45#p134227
Re: Compositions at a 64-cell board by Andrew Fomin
Post by FOMIN » Thu May 16, 2024 03:06
1.cb2 ! cd4 2.e:e7 cd6 3.e:c5 b:d4 4 . f:d6 h:h2 5.c:e5 hg1
6.de3 gh2 7.ef6! h:c7 8.ef4 e:e1 9.bc3 e:b4 10.a:c5 ab6
11.c:a7 ab4 12.ab8 bc3 13.bf4 cb2 14.fc1 ba1 15. ch6 a:g7 16.h:f8 x

Position from the "City party" beginning . c3-d4 f6-g5 2. b2-c3 g5-h4 3. c3-b4 d6-c5 4. b4xd6 e7xc5 5. g3-f4 f8-e7 6.
a1-b2 e7-d6 7. f2-g3 h4xf2 8. e1xg3 b6-a5 9. d4xb6 a7xc5 10. b2-c3 g7-f6 11.
g3-h4 f6-e5 ? - (11...d8-e7 would have led to a draw!)
12. h2-g3 b8-a7 13. g1-f2 c7-b6 14. h4-g5 d8-c7


Plagiarist wrote :
Author is P. Shkludov

In the plagiarist's position, Black's best plan is the line a 1.bc3 fe5 2.cb2 hg7! after which the game drags on for a long time.
Uncompisitional line " a" clutters the solution of the plagiarist "attempt ," which is a sign about deterioration of the original work of A. Fomin.

[FOMIN]

viewtopic.php?p=135678#p135678
P. Shkludov (Belarus) , 5-th USSR championship on draughts composition,1983
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17594358391.png

17594358391.png (5.03 KiB) Viewed 10377 times

There was known before :
S. Perepelkin , "64",1975
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17594360889.png

17594360889.png (5.92 KiB) Viewed 10362 times

gh4(ab2),fg7, fg5, ed2, a:g3,gf2,h:f2 x
Ps::In 2015, the main defendant in the draights corruption before General .Assebly FMJD proposed a lifetime disqualification towards the Russian Draughts Federation President Anatoly Nikitin, This proposal resulted in public awareness of the mental illness of the protagonist of Russian writer Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel. The novel and his main hero so calls as "an idiot."
Pps: It was a disgrace for such a major draughts composer as V. Matus that he nominated a
psychosomatic from collective farmers to the position of puppeteer of draughts composition.
The nomination of P. Shkludov by V. Matus for the position of judge in the 100-cell section etudies of the World Championship with the participation of Mr. Jaap Bus was also completely like absurd . ( Until the appointment of P. Shkludov to the position of judge, this self-proclaimed judge had not created a single, even mediocre, hundred-cell etude. Despite this fact self-satisfied person was put in a 100-cell garden as a judge) .