Compositions at 64-cell board by Andtew Fomin

Moderator: FOMIN

Post Reply
FOMIN
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 22:40
Real name: ANDREW

Compositions at 64-cell board by Andtew Fomin

Post by FOMIN »

The plagiarist writes: viewtopic.php?p=135275#p135275
Refutation of the plagiarist's arguments.
viewtopic.php?t=8751
FOMIN wrote: Thu Sep 18, 2025 23:22
The Belarusian composer Petukhan Kurikhanovich, (who never created a single century 100-cell study in his entire life )was not invited by Bus to judge. Impostor Kurikhanovich, both in 2005 and 2012, was foisted on the people by V. Matus and A. Kachyushka as a puppeteer, an impostor and amateur who held no judicial rank in checkers competition. The impostor once cast Matus in an unflattering light in his homemade magazine, when, using forged documents, V. Matus received the title of "International Grandmaster of Honorary Degree." V. Matus decided to share the portfolio with the annoyingly buzzing mosquito: he took the 100-square checkers for himself , and dared to hand over the Russian checkers to the impostor, Kurikhanovich. In effect, by this action, V. Matus placed himself on the same level as the impostor. As for Dalidovich's fraud, he dared to alter the final results of the USSR Championship, already published in the Vechernyaya Perm newspaper, and ultimately did so, even though the aforementioned swindler acted covertly. As for M. Stanovsky, he was a comrade and godfather of Leonid Vitoshkin. In such a situation, Aleksander Fedoruk was powerless to deal with a well-knit group of ill-wishers judges.
As for the so-called world draughts sports organization of composers , it never existed. However, at various times, some random draughts organization leaders with crony connections to the FMJD leadership organized feeding troughs for themselves, and distributed the scraps from the master's table to their cronies, in-laws, and brothers, using themself nepotistic connections with the FMJD leadership.. Such cronies included, for example, the coordinator Nagumanov, which was introducted to Mr. AJaap Bus by V. Matus, the international arbiter Nikolai Grushevsky, who never judged, and the same friends , Nagumanov, who emailed back the estimates of compositions , prepared for him by P. Shkludov, In the Belarus republic, after the collapse of the USSR, a law persecuting parasites was enacted, and this is precisely why ununemployed draughts composers began to seek justification for themselves in the context of their status as unemployed parasites. On this subject, Alexander Kogotko, a popular draughts composer , appeared on the forum: "A toad croaked in a swamp: I am a mountain, I am higher than the mountains. But a passing stork pecked the arrogant frog on the forehead and carried it off to feed its youngers ."

Regarding the reincarnation of Mr. P. Shkludov into judges A. Shabalin ,A.Lukianov and V. Bulat, as well as into participant Anton Pavlovich Mekhov - a famous Russian writer and author of the popular story Ward No. 6.
Judge V. Bulat unexpectedly placed the universally recognized master of checkers composition in fifth place in the first world championship of 1994, which was announced but never concluded to this day. And the real judge, Mikhail Levandovsky, suddenly placed the aforementioned master in first place. This master, according to estimates of Mr. Levandovsky, was Alexander Bakumets. Thus, it became clear to the people that under the name of judge V. Bulat, the well-known reincarnator P. Shkludov gave scores to the outstanding master of draughts composition. As for the participant Anton Pavlovich Mekhov, his works such as the stories "The Man in the Case", "The Fat and the Thin", "Ward No. 6" and other stories are favorite stories of the writer P. Shkludov. In these stories, P. Shkludov always reveals himself. For example, the frog from the swamp, who imagined himself higher than the mountains, in different times was treated in that very ward number 6, which was told about in his famous story by the famous writer Anton Pavlovich Chekhov.
A major mistake by FMJD Vice President Peter Hildering (Netherlands) was publishing a response to a random man in the fields of draughts -100,, which Mr. P. Hildering posted on the "Draughts in Russia" forum. This answer might have led some to believe that some outsider in the draughts composition field from a collective farm was an important figure in the field of draughts composition. In fact, he was responding to an outsider in draughts composition competitions, who had spent his entire life practicing in front of a Christmas tree of other people's worksworks ,who tryed to remake these decorations to their advantage
************
».The forger Shkludov was let down by his greed: in the false world championship -2012:: he lacked as complicity in fraud of friendfull judge G. Andreev (Latvia) and the dummy judge A. Nagumanov(Russia) , which was able to deal with two of his competitors in this false "contest".. The forger dealt with his fellow countryman Vasily Grebenki very simply: he sent for judge Nagumanov a series of garbage and disparaging assessments with purpose of destroying P. Shkludov's competitors, so that he could set these assessments, rigging them .Nagumanov sent the " psychiatric " raitings as their own scores .Vasily Grebenko was destroyed by this "bullet fired from an ambush." ​​All that remained was to destroy Fomin's compositions. Instead of evaluating them in the trash category, the fraudster, with the help of Kachyushka and the judges entrusted to him, banned three of Fomin's compositions that complied with the championship regulations from participating. The fraudster's greed was so great that he failed to even consider evaluating Fomin's three positions to protect himself from any potential claims by A. Fomin against the FMJD leadership. In that case, Fomin would have been unable to file a complaint, and the powerful criminal organization CPI FMJD would have continued its atrocities in the field of checkers composition. But the expected happened: the fraudsters were exposed, as the FMJD leadership, having read the regulations of contest in English, concluded that Fomin's three compositions should be evaluated. In response, the fraudster organized a new, fake world championship, in which he allowed all compositions published in A. Gorin's self-made collection, titled "The First World Championship 1994-1997," to participate.As a result, the false organization was dissolved at the FMJD General Assembly in 2017 . :P


№1297 A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17537314586.png
viewtopic.php?p=135011#p135011
Gry w warcaby na planszy 64-polowej autorstwa Andrieja Fomina
Post by FOMIN » Fri Jul 25, 2025 04:12
image_handler - 2025-09-19T180257.147.png
image_handler - 2025-09-19T180257.147.png (5.22 KiB) Viewed 17790 times
1.ef6 h:f2 2.fe7 d;f6 3.b:d2:b4 a:v3 4.g:e3 cd2 5.cb2 d:f4
6.bc3 fe3 7.hg3 x


№1300 A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17547351899.png[/b]
image_handler - 2025-09-19T151842.768.png
image_handler - 2025-09-19T151842.768.png (5.88 KiB) Viewed 17797 times

gf6 g5,,d6,ab4! a5,cb2,bc3,e7,h6 etc. x - N.Pankratov ["Rebus",1882
There was known before :
N. N.
image_handler - 2025-09-19T165139.117.png
image_handler - 2025-09-19T165139.117.png (5.79 KiB) Viewed 17797 times
gf6 g5, d6,b2,c3,e7, h6 -etc. x N.N.Pankratov ,1882
№1306 A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17563909284.png
image_handler - 2025-08-28T170947.502.png
image_handler - 2025-08-28T170947.502.png (6.01 KiB) Viewed 17793 times
cb6, b4, f2, c5, c5 etc. x- an etude by L. Vitoshkin from the newspaper "Gomel Pravda" , 1960 appeared on the board:5... (cd6 )Vp1 6.e7 b4 7.f8 c3 8.h6 b2 9.c1 a1 10.h6 11.f8 x Vp1 5...(cb6 ) ,6.a7 b4 7.b8 bc3 8.bf4 b2 9.c1 a1 10.h6 11.f8 x
№1302 A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17548150439.png
image_handler - 2025-09-15T091910.319.png
image_handler - 2025-09-15T091910.319.png (5.28 KiB) Viewed 17791 times
1.de3 a:c5 2.ab6 c:a7 3.e:c5 d:b4 4.gf4 e:e1 5.bc3 b:d2 6.gf2 e:g3 7.h:e1 ab6 8.ef2 ba5 9 fe1 x
A. Lukianov and A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17581456011.png
image_handler - 2025-09-19T210222.614.png
image_handler - 2025-09-19T210222.614.png (6.04 KiB) Viewed 17779 times
1.bc7 2.bc5 3.a:c7 - further A. Lukianov,2010 3...gh2 A ,B 4.cd8 ef4 5.ed2 fg3 6.de3 gf2 7.df6 f:d4 8.f:c3 -E. Leclerk 8....ab6 9.cb4 hg3 10.be1 bc5 12.e:h4 cd4 13.hg5 dc3 14.gc1 x
A 3...ab6 4.c:a5 ed4 5.ed2 gh2 6.ab6 hg3 7.ba7 dc3 C 8.d:b4 gf2 9.g:e3 hg1 10.bc5 g:b6 11.a:c5 x
B 3...ef4 4.gh2 fe3 5.h:d2 hg3 6.cb8 gh2 7.bg3 ! h:f4 8 de3 f:d2 9.e:c3 ab6 10.cb4/d4 ba5 11.bc5 x
C 7...de3 8.d:f4 g:e5 9.ab8 ef4 D 10.b:g3 h:f4 11.gf2 x D 9 .. ed4 10.bf4 dc3 11.fc1 x

D. Kamchitsky (Brazilian draughts)
Image
1 ab4 a1 2 cb2 a:c3 3.gf6 g5 4.h:d2 further S. Ustianov ,15-th Moscow championship, 1988 etc. x
Processing by A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17583229284.png
17583229284.png
17583229284.png (5.91 KiB) Viewed 17773 times
1.gh8 c:a1 2.cb2 a:c3 3.hf6 e:g5 4.h:d2 -further S. Ustianov ,15-th Moscow championship on draughts composition ,1988
This is a predecessor towards the endgame to the positions of D. Kamchitsky and A. Fomin
Screenshot_20250920-094502.jpg
....4.....dc3 A 5.d:b4 gf2 6.g:e3 hg1 7.bc5 g:b6 8.a:c5 x A 4....de3 5.d:f4 g:e5 6.ab8 ef4 7.b:g3 h:f4 8.gf2 x
Instead of 7...(de5)?? it is necessary to play like this in this position: 7...(hg3) ! 8.b:d2 fe3 9.d:f4 g:e5 with a draw. The "problem" received a zero score , but the authorship of the endgame remained with S. Ustyanov.
**********************
S. Gorin,arranged by A. Fomin

17584338148.png
17584338148.png (5.42 KiB) Viewed 17732 times
1.ab6 2.cb6 3.de3 4.de5 5.h:g1 - A. Gorin, 1988 gf6 A -G.Isaev 1987 6.ge3 bc7 7.ed2 ! ba3 8.bc3 cb6 9.cb4 a:c5 10.ea5 ! x
A 5...gh6 6.gh2 hg5 7.hd6 gh4 8.h:a3 hg3 9.ac5 gh2 10.cg1 cb6 12.g:a7 hg1 13.cd4 x
FOMIN
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 22:40
Real name: ANDREW

Re: Compositions at 64-cell boarn d by Andtew Fomin

Post by FOMIN »

Post Reply