LA LETTRE OUVERTE
Cher Monsieur Jaap Bus,
Nous, les responsables nationaux des organisations des compositeurs de jeu de dames, vous demandons de répondre d’urgence à 3 questions :
1. Pourquoi jusqu'ici ne sont pas encore annoncées les positions du PWCP II ? Le dernier délai de l'expédition des positions pour le Championnat du Monde était le 15-01-2008. Il est évident qu'elles devaient être connues au plus tard le 15–03–2008. Et dans un cas extrême, dans la première moitié d'avril 2008.
2. Sur le site de Kandaurov (http: // www.shashki.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-1006.html), le 04 mai 2008, Mr E.Zubov, juge du concours “Mémorial Dalidovitch” et PWCP II déclare :
«Je jugerai selon les règles qui étaient mises au point et acceptées en URSS.»
Si cela devait se faire cela signifierait que les bilans du concours “Mémorial Dalidovitch” et PWCP II seraient amenés non selon les Règles Internationales CPI FMJD, mais selon les règles de l'URSS ?
3. Pourquoi jusqu'à ce jour à la CPI il n'y a aucun représentant de la France (APF), des Pays-Bas (KvD), de la Lituanie (LSKMS) ou de l'Ukraine ?
Amicalement,
Algimantas Kaciuska, le président LSKMS (LDCAU)
Rimas Mackevičius, le vice président LSKMS (LDCAU)
Alain Tavernier, le président APF
Alain Vermeulen, APF
ОТКРЫТОЕ ПИСЬМО
Уважаемый господин Jaap Bus,
Мы, руководители национальных организации шашечных композиторов, просим Вас срочно ответить на 3 вопроса:
1.Почему до сих пор не объявлены позиции PWCP – 2? Последний (заключительный) срок отправки позиции на чемпионат мира был 15–01 –2008. Очевидно, что они должны были быть объявлены не позднее 15–03–2008. В крайнем случае – в первой половине апреля 2008 года.
2.На сайте Кандауров (http://www.shashki.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-1006.html) 04 – 05 – 2008 судья конкурса “Memorial Dalidovitch” и PWCP – 2 Mr.E.Zubov заявил:
«Я же буду судить согласно правилам, которые были доработаны и приняты в СССР.»
Обозначает ли это, что итоги конкурса “Memorial Dalidovitch” и PWCP – 2 будут подведены не по правилам RI CPI FMJD, а по правилам СССР?
3.Почему в CPI до севодняшнего дня нет ни одного представителя Франции (APF), Голландии (KvD), Литвы (LSKMS), Украины?
С уважением,
Algimantas Kaciuska, президент LSKMS (LDCAU)
Rimas Mackeviсius, вице президент LSKMS (LDCAU)
Alain Tavernier, президент APF
Alain Vermeulen, APF
PWCP-2, Memorial Dalidovitch, etc.
-
frank teer
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 13:43
Dear Mr Kaciuska,
Sorry my French is not so good so I answer in english.
Your first two questions are already answered in another thread on this forum; I will answer your third question: why are there no representatives of Holland, Lithuanie, France, Ukraine in the CPI?
That question is easily answered: there were no candidates from these countries on the General Assembly in Aix-les-Bains from these countries where candidates were elected for several commissions. If Lithuanie had proposed Mr. Kaciuska and France had proposed Mr. Tavernier and Holland had proposed Mr. van der Stoep then may be the situation would be different.
But it is nonsense to criticize the FMJD and the CPI if you do not pose any candidature for this commission on the General Assembly.
That is the right way to do it, not by complaining in this forum.
Expecting to see your candidature in the GA 2009.
Frank Teer, general secretary FMJD
Sorry my French is not so good so I answer in english.
Your first two questions are already answered in another thread on this forum; I will answer your third question: why are there no representatives of Holland, Lithuanie, France, Ukraine in the CPI?
That question is easily answered: there were no candidates from these countries on the General Assembly in Aix-les-Bains from these countries where candidates were elected for several commissions. If Lithuanie had proposed Mr. Kaciuska and France had proposed Mr. Tavernier and Holland had proposed Mr. van der Stoep then may be the situation would be different.
But it is nonsense to criticize the FMJD and the CPI if you do not pose any candidature for this commission on the General Assembly.
That is the right way to do it, not by complaining in this forum.
Expecting to see your candidature in the GA 2009.
Frank Teer, general secretary FMJD
-
Algimantas
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 21:30
Dear Mr. Frank Teer,
I.
Thanks for the answer, for very correct tone of your text.
Basically you are right and it is difficult with you will disagree.
At the same time I wish to specify:
1. Last years in CPI almost nobody has been selected on GA FMJD, candidates affirmed on EB (CD) FMJD.
2. In Aix – les – Bains on GA FMJD any question draughts compositions or activity CPI was not discussed, president CPI there was not present.
3. Our question has been caused also by the text of president CPI Mr. J.Bus on forward page web – site FMJD which there has appeared already after GA FMJD 20 – 12 – 2007 http: // fmjd.org/? p=comp and where in particular Mr. J.Bus writes:
(…)«The conclusion was reached that it does not make sense to continue unless the following conditions are met:
- the CPI should have members or at least official contacts out of The Netherlands, Russia, France, Belarus, Ukraine and Lithuania. Obviously representatives of other countries are welcome as well.»(…)
II.
To us especially not clear sharp reaction Mr. J.Bus to our simple questions. With it I today have sent our correspondence to you by e-mail.
In particular, in the answer from 05 – 05 – 2008 Mr. J.Bus writes (this answer from it have received nearby 60 person):
(…)«The Lithuanian member of the CPI, Algimanatas Kaciuska was dismissed from the CPI after repeatedly violating the agreements made with you in a meeting of the CPI with the Executive Vice President of the FMJD. After efforts of the FMJD to clear the situation you continued with violating the agreements, with supporting jury members who did not follow the RI, with hostile publications on Internet, with not respecting the opinion of the KvD and so on. And finallly suggesting on Internet that the FMJD Board should be killed or something similar.»(…)
Any the agreement neither in Warsaw, nor in other places I did not do neither with Mr. P.Hilderig, nor with Mr. J.Bus. I have been excluded from CPI for criticism of actions Mr. P.Hildering and Mr. J.Bus. Last offer is quoted the text – very serious CHARGE which has stated official FMJD. I from Mr. J.Bus DEMAND in current 14 (fourteen) сalendar days to prove these words. Otherwise (if it will not be proved) about the further steps I shall inform and Mr. J.Bus, and another.
Except for that, 06 – 05 – 2008 Mr. J.Bus has declared:
«I do not want to spend more time on discussing with Kaciuska and Tavernier. Even when new lies come up, I will not reply.»
III.
Also allow to take advantage of a case and to tell to you the opinion on modernization of work CPI FMJD. About it I wrote in DE PROBLEMIST, N1 (2007) (fr.):
(...) »Un section approchant la “Section – 64” FMJD) au lieu de CPI dans le cadre de FMJD. Elle-même élit les responsables selon le principe de la rotation à son Assemblée Générale, les membres rendent compte devants leurs collègues etc. L’administration doit comprendre en nombre égal des représentants de toutes les sociétés nationales ou les organisations des compositeurs. Les organisations d’échecs éffectuent depuis longtemps une telle éxpérience, à FIDE (PCCC – Permanent Commission of the FIDE for Chess Compositions). » (...)
Dear Mr. F.Teer, forgive to me for my bad English language in this my answer.
Best regards,
Algimantas Kaciuska
I.
Thanks for the answer, for very correct tone of your text.
Basically you are right and it is difficult with you will disagree.
At the same time I wish to specify:
1. Last years in CPI almost nobody has been selected on GA FMJD, candidates affirmed on EB (CD) FMJD.
2. In Aix – les – Bains on GA FMJD any question draughts compositions or activity CPI was not discussed, president CPI there was not present.
3. Our question has been caused also by the text of president CPI Mr. J.Bus on forward page web – site FMJD which there has appeared already after GA FMJD 20 – 12 – 2007 http: // fmjd.org/? p=comp and where in particular Mr. J.Bus writes:
(…)«The conclusion was reached that it does not make sense to continue unless the following conditions are met:
- the CPI should have members or at least official contacts out of The Netherlands, Russia, France, Belarus, Ukraine and Lithuania. Obviously representatives of other countries are welcome as well.»(…)
II.
To us especially not clear sharp reaction Mr. J.Bus to our simple questions. With it I today have sent our correspondence to you by e-mail.
In particular, in the answer from 05 – 05 – 2008 Mr. J.Bus writes (this answer from it have received nearby 60 person):
(…)«The Lithuanian member of the CPI, Algimanatas Kaciuska was dismissed from the CPI after repeatedly violating the agreements made with you in a meeting of the CPI with the Executive Vice President of the FMJD. After efforts of the FMJD to clear the situation you continued with violating the agreements, with supporting jury members who did not follow the RI, with hostile publications on Internet, with not respecting the opinion of the KvD and so on. And finallly suggesting on Internet that the FMJD Board should be killed or something similar.»(…)
Any the agreement neither in Warsaw, nor in other places I did not do neither with Mr. P.Hilderig, nor with Mr. J.Bus. I have been excluded from CPI for criticism of actions Mr. P.Hildering and Mr. J.Bus. Last offer is quoted the text – very serious CHARGE which has stated official FMJD. I from Mr. J.Bus DEMAND in current 14 (fourteen) сalendar days to prove these words. Otherwise (if it will not be proved) about the further steps I shall inform and Mr. J.Bus, and another.
Except for that, 06 – 05 – 2008 Mr. J.Bus has declared:
«I do not want to spend more time on discussing with Kaciuska and Tavernier. Even when new lies come up, I will not reply.»
III.
Also allow to take advantage of a case and to tell to you the opinion on modernization of work CPI FMJD. About it I wrote in DE PROBLEMIST, N1 (2007) (fr.):
(...) »Un section approchant la “Section – 64” FMJD) au lieu de CPI dans le cadre de FMJD. Elle-même élit les responsables selon le principe de la rotation à son Assemblée Générale, les membres rendent compte devants leurs collègues etc. L’administration doit comprendre en nombre égal des représentants de toutes les sociétés nationales ou les organisations des compositeurs. Les organisations d’échecs éffectuent depuis longtemps une telle éxpérience, à FIDE (PCCC – Permanent Commission of the FIDE for Chess Compositions). » (...)
Dear Mr. F.Teer, forgive to me for my bad English language in this my answer.
Best regards,
Algimantas Kaciuska
