Петр Шклудов, 2026г. - Страница 5
...
..
g5, b6, a5(e3), f4(g5), h6(g3), f4 – И.Навроцкий - (b6), c7, b8(b2 A), g7, g5, g3, a3+ A(e1), f2(e5), f4(b2 B), e5(a1), f6, f8+ B(g7), f8, g7+
g5(f4), h4…+
f8(e7), d6, a5…+
At the same time, P. shok_vdul deliberately omits the ideological (apotheosis) predecessor he relied on when creating the three new "models". The predecessor was published on March 24, 2026, in another forum thread:
....A. Fomin....(correction)
1.hg5 fe3 2.df4 ef6 3.g:c5 cb6 4.a:c7 b:d2 5.ab8 ab2 A
6.hg7 h:f6 7.fg5 f:h4 8.bg3 h:f2 9.g:a3 x
A 5...de1 6.gf2 e:e5 7.b:f4 ab2 8.fe5 bc1 9.ef4 c:g5 10.h:f4 x [The following shortcomings have been corrected: : the inequality of forces and the unnatural location of the black checker a3 and the superstructure in the form of an exchange of checkers for the first move of the solution (please, see below the position of an ideological predecessor ) ]
I.Navrotsky , contest "Odessa -1989/1990 "(6 points) .
1.bc3 d:b2 2.a:c3 (ef6) 3.g:c5 (cb6), 4.a:c7 (b:d2)
5.ab8 (ab2) A 6. hg7 (h:f6) 7.hg5(f:h4) 8.bg3 (h:f2) 9.g:a3 x
A 5...(de1) 6. gf2(e:e5) 7.b:f4 (ab2) 8.fe5(ba1)B 9.ef6(a:g7) 10.h:f8 xB 8...(bc1) 9.ef4 (c:g5) 10.h:f4 x
The difference between the original work by I. Navrotsky from contest "Odessa-1989/1990 " and its adaptation by A. Fomin is that A. Fomin was the first to avoid the unfortunate addition of an exchange that barked the first move to Black, although such an exchange required proof of legality.
In this way, P. Vdul_shok regularly attaches himself to other people's intellectual works, engaging in both hidden and overt plagiarism in different situations.
********************************
Ps:
Author is P. Vdul_Shok, "Shashki №7, 1981
1.ef2 -solution by P. Vdul_Shok or 1.fb4 2.de3 - simple alternative solution
Поэт писал : "Что ж, веселитесь!
Он мучений позорных вынести не смог :
Угас вершитель привидений , пал обосравшийся "Сапог" !:lol:
...
(Могилой, а Вы , уважаемые читатели , что подумали ?) 
2 
3 
