Anthology of mistakes

[FOMIN]

Anthology of mistakes
"Odessa School of Draughts Composition,", 2012 , position No. 397
A. Balaniuk
Yu. Gres : "Evening Odessa", 04/24/1976
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17649982947.png
1.gh4 2.c5 3.c7 4.g7 5.d8 x

17649982947.png (5.16 KiB) Viewed 144 times

A garbage quality endgame appeared on the board to put it mildly although, it is quite acceptable according to the rules of checkers composition of the former USSR..

Correction by S. Pupkin

1.cd2 2.gf4 3.e:c5 4.bc7 d:b6 5.a:g7 6.h:d8 ab6 7.d:a5 hg5 8.ad2 gh4 9.df4 ba7 10.fc7 ab6 11.c:a5 hg3 12.ab6 gh2 23.g1 x
*********************"*****************
"Odessa School of Draughts Composition,", 2012 , position No. 1135
A. Balaniuk (Odessa region) : " Glory to Labor", Moldova, August 25, 1990 г.

1.gh8 ef4 2.gf2 3.c:g5 4.h:a7 x
In terms of the balance of power between the parties, this is not a composition, but rather a task for beginner solvers.
Moreover, the white checker h2 does not participate in the combination and can be removed by improving the content of the indicated unsuccessful miniature.
Correction by S. Pupkin
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17650012489.png
1.gh82.ab6 3.gf2 4.c:g5 5.h:a7 x
But and this miniature is hardly new.

17650012489.png (5.92 KiB) Viewed 136 times

******************

At the end of the review it should be mentioned a predecessor on this topic.
On October 13, 1986, the newspaper "Dneprovskaya Pravda" published the following miniature by A. Fomin

[FOMIN]

A. Maluta :The book "Odessa school of draughts composition", No. 53 , p. 31

1.ab6 x Second solution : 1.hg7 ! 2.ab8 dc5 3.bd6 and the whites win. (A.Fomin;"Mith"-forum,2014
Correction : a5>b6 ;f4>g3 1) gf4 and then follows an accurate play in each of the two possible options 1...cb2 or 1...cd2 , where Whites win.
*************
A. Maluta :""Shashki"-10-1974 , The book "Odessa school of draughts composition", No. 70, p. 32

b9, fe5, gf4 (e5), b:g3, a3 x
Simple second solution : 2.fe3 3.fg5 4.bg3 5.a3 x


A. Maluta :the book Odessa school of draughts composition, 2012 , No. 95

vd2, g5, cd4, bd2, c7, a:g7 x
The white d2 checker is not needed in the finale, which means that this composition is a defect product.
Moreover, this unfinished work has a close predecessor.
I. and Yu. Begaevs.

ef4, de5 (df4), cd2, g6, a5, c7, g7 x

[FOMIN]

The book by A. Maliuts :"Odessa school of draughts composition", 2012 , No. 53 , p. 31
Author is Balanyuk A. G. (Moldova, Koikovo village), 2nd USSR Championship by Ttrade unions on composition of checkers , 1989

There is a draw after the move 5...ab4 ! instead of 5...cg5 ??
6.c:a3 cf4! 7.ad4 fh2! 8.ab6 ( 8.ab4 hd6=) hg1 9.dc5 gh2 =
The move 7.d8-f6 also wins, due to a hopeless endgame for Blacks.

[FOMIN]

The book by A. Maliuts :"Odessa school of draughts composition", 2012 , No. 336 , p. 57
Author is A. Sosunov : contest "Odessa-1988",(7 points) , 2nd USSR Champion of Trade Unions -1989 , 7-th USSR championship 1989-1990 on composition of draughts.

17664717712.png (6.1 KiB) Viewed 7 times

1.bc3 (ab2)? [ 1...bc5 2.cb4 ef6! = ]2.cd4 bc2 3.ed6 !! c:e1 4.a:c7 b:d6 5.gf2 7.h:f4 c:g5 8.h: d8 x -
with an inaccurate game in this finale motive .