Congratulations to Wieger!
Rein, let me point that UTF-8 is the encoding for the Unicode character set. Character set answers to question what characters are allowed, the encoding answers to the question how they are stored in bytes.

Search found 6 matches
- Wed Feb 08, 2012 01:17
- Forum: Draughts, Computer, Internet
- Topic: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
- Replies: 79
- Views: 41594
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 13:37
- Forum: Draughts, Computer, Internet
- Topic: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
- Replies: 79
- Views: 41594
Re: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
in PGN there is a section about character codes: http://www.saremba.de/chessgml/standards/pgn/pgn-complete.htm#c4.1 . It recommends to use only ASCII characters. This seems questionable to me, so I did not copy it into the PDN standard.
Read the section about character encodings.
The decision to ...
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 13:14
- Forum: Draughts, Computer, Internet
- Topic: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
- Replies: 79
- Views: 41594
Re: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
It seems to me that STRING values and COMMENT values should be allowed to contain Unicode characters.
That's good.
On the one hand I can understand that it is useful to restrict PDN to a single format like UTF-8. On the other hand I find it questionable to disallow ASCII files. I can't ...
- Sat Jan 07, 2012 21:48
- Forum: Draughts, Computer, Internet
- Topic: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
- Replies: 79
- Views: 41594
Re: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
What is your opinion on allowing different separators? E.g. in Russian draughts, I often see '-' for moves and ':' for captures, and in Thai draughts they use '-' for moves and captures. The proposal only allows ':' in the reading grammar, not in the writing grammar. Is this OK as far as the ...
- Sat Jan 07, 2012 21:26
- Forum: Draughts, Computer, Internet
- Topic: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
- Replies: 79
- Views: 41594
Re: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
As to character encodings.
We have several options to choose: ASCII, UTF-8, any other 1-byte per character codepages (cp1252, for Europe I guess), UTF-16, other N-byte per character codepages (UCS-2 but it seems to be deprecated almost everywhere).
If ASCII would go to the standard - the checkers ...
We have several options to choose: ASCII, UTF-8, any other 1-byte per character codepages (cp1252, for Europe I guess), UTF-16, other N-byte per character codepages (UCS-2 but it seems to be deprecated almost everywhere).
If ASCII would go to the standard - the checkers ...
- Wed Oct 05, 2011 05:26
- Forum: Draughts, Computer, Internet
- Topic: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
- Replies: 79
- Views: 41594
Re: PDN 3.0 Standard Review Request
A word about FEN notation.
In russian checkers fields are named as follows:
a1, c1, e1, g1, b2, d2, ...
I have tried to specify the field by such a name, but PDN checker rejects this.
I think, there is a problem here. Moves are specified as c3-d4 f6-g5, and this is ok.
Another problem is that PDN ...
In russian checkers fields are named as follows:
a1, c1, e1, g1, b2, d2, ...
I have tried to specify the field by such a name, but PDN checker rejects this.
I think, there is a problem here. Moves are specified as c3-d4 f6-g5, and this is ok.
Another problem is that PDN ...