Skip to content
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:43
FOMIN wrote: Mon Sep 15, 2025 09:33 Ecumenical Ruler P. Shkludov has authorized the WDF administrator to delete the "Delete" topic. Apparently, next time, the Sovereign of all Rus will ask the administrator to bring him porridge . Let's hope the gracious ruler will authorize the administrator to delete l and this topic
Вселенский Правитель П. Шклюдов уполномочил администратора ВДФ удалить тему «Удалить». Видимо, в следующий раз Государь всея Руси попросит администратора принести ему каши. Будем надеяться милостивый правитель разрешит админу удалить л и эту тему
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:42
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:41
FOMIN wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 11:49 P. Shkludov writes about himself: do not pay attention to a person who is sick with hatred. ************************ LeoMinor writes about writer A. P. Mekhov : : It would be interesting to list active users on "ShvR" who are not in a "sharp and scandalous" conflict (or were not at one time) with P.Shkludov (either on checkers issues or on other issues far from checkers) and it is here that we need to look for both the reason and the answers. By the way, I remember such a "sharp and scandalous" conflict between Mr. A.Kačiuška and P.Shkludov, where he wrote to him that any honest Lithuanian would have punched him in the face. I am sure that Mr. Algimantas is also an honest Lithuanian and thus it is clear to me that he cannot discuss this, which is connected with Mr.P.Shkludov, entirely objectively. Is this incomprehensible for human?! Or are there other criteria here?! ***************** Ps: The provocateur, who opened this topic for his provocations, is counting on a sharp conflict with the hope of a mutual ban from the side of the administrator of the checkers forum, although the provocateur was stopped by irrefutable evidence of his mediocrity, confirmed by judges of major international competitions. The neutralized disinformer, who did not expect such a brilliant exposure, is in agony, unable to agree with himself about where the lie is and where the truth is, and sells the readers fog. Pps: The author of these lines with this message closes his temporary and forced participation in this topic. New revelations of the provocateur will be published on the forum "myth", closed to provocations from the disinformer.
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:40
FOMIN wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 08:29 FOMIN wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 01:33 IMG_20250820_020549_835.jpg 9-th Moscow championship , 1982 , section "etudies-64 ", No. 24 Chief judge A. Fedoruk reports:" No. 24 is marriage ! As V. Demidov pointed out, the "etude" is not solved in variant A after 4...hc7 instead of (ab4? ) .Instead of 23...bc7 (see variation B) a draw is given by 13...hg7 14...bd2 15.fe5 ab2 =" The petitioner failed to mislead the judges of the IX Moscow Championship again. The one who constantly stands onь" the porch" (please, guess hisvname? ) scored a huge number of zero points in the sections of the championship where he participated. *********************** Ps: For "outstanding" achievements in the fields of physical education and sports, the chairman of the non-existent Communist Party of Intellectuals (CPI - recognizer ) awarded this laureate in 2018 the title of *Weakling of All Rus * ". 9-th Moscow championship , 1982 , section "etudies-64 ", No. 25 , score=0 points A.Fedoruk wrote : Second solution :1.dc3 ! ef4 2.fh4 fe3A 3.cs1 bs5 4.hd8 x A (bs5), 3.cd4 ab4 4.hd8 cd4 5.s:g3/h2 - analysis by V. Demidov The petitioner standing on "the porch " once again got what he deserved. https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17557086056.png image_handler - 2025-08-20T195100.193.png
FOMIN wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 01:33 IMG_20250820_020549_835.jpg 9-th Moscow championship , 1982 , section "etudies-64 ", No. 24 Chief judge A. Fedoruk reports:" No. 24 is marriage ! As V. Demidov pointed out, the "etude" is not solved in variant A after 4...hc7 instead of (ab4? ) .Instead of 23...bc7 (see variation B) a draw is given by 13...hg7 14...bd2 15.fe5 ab2 =" The petitioner failed to mislead the judges of the IX Moscow Championship again. The one who constantly stands onь" the porch" (please, guess hisvname? ) scored a huge number of zero points in the sections of the championship where he participated. *********************** Ps: For "outstanding" achievements in the fields of physical education and sports, the chairman of the non-existent Communist Party of Intellectuals (CPI - recognizer ) awarded this laureate in 2018 the title of *Weakling of All Rus * ".
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:39
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:38
FOMIN wrote: Wed Aug 20, 2025 01:33 9-th Moscow championship , 1982 , section "etudies-64 ", No. 24 Chief judge A. Fedoruk reports:" No. 24 is marriage ! As V. Demidov pointed out, the "etude" is not solved in variant A after 4...hc7 instead of (ab4? ) .Instead of 23...bc7 (see variation B) a draw is given by 13...hg7 14...bd2 15.fe5 ab2 =" The petitioner failed to mislead the judges of the IX Moscow Championship again. The one who constantly stands onь" the porch" (please, guess hisvname? ) scored a huge number of zero points in the sections of the championship where he participated. *********************** Ps: For "outstanding" achievements in the fields of physical education and sports, the chairman of the non-existent Communist Party of Intellectuals (CPI - recognizer ) awarded this laureate in 2018 the title of *Weakling of All Rus * ".
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:35
FOMIN wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 20:37 9th Moscow Championship, 1982 (another defeat of the dwarven troops near Moscow) . The author writes: Sent in May 1982 to the magazine "64 Chess Review" 1.40 х A. Fedoruk wrote :"Marriage! The side simple solution was indicated by B. Shkitkin: 1.44-40 2.20-25 3.11-7 4.17:8 5.6-1 x" Ps: It is not for nothing that they say: don’t dig a hole for someone else, you will fall into it yourself
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:34
FOMIN wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 19:59 Another failure of the draughts Gnom: 1.17-11 06:37 2. 10-04 3.04 :02 etc. x Simple side solution :1.32-28 2.10-4 or 10-5
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:33
by Shkludov » Mon Sep 15, 2025 10:32
FOMIN wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 09:07 9-th Moscow Championship, 1982 Chief judge A. Fedoruk wrote :" Marriage! the position allows for the side solution 1.38 2.48 3.8 with a winning endgame. Also winning is 1.30 2.38 3.48 4.8 x In the false trail indicated by the author, one can also win after 3.33! (36) 4.30 5.16 etc. with a winning endgame The board shows a diagram of a composition by a brilliant author. image_handler - 2025-08-19T083746.876.png The author of the topic, under the guise of compositions, depicts "tasks" sucked out of a finger, that is, he is engaged in trolling. But the defendant of the lawyer hired by him, as it turned out, repeatedly participated in competitions of the highest rank, where he received for his inventions worthy marks (mostly zero). Ps: It is not for nothing that they say: don’t dig a hole for someone else, you will fall into it yourself!
Top
