Match Golubeva - Tkachenko

[Juri]

Last 4-th game of 2 set finished for draw. So Tkachenko won 2 set and now its draw after 2 sets.
But in this game Tkachenko played terrible move 1420, and got a bad position:


Golubeva - Tkachenko
white move.

Could Golubeva win here?

[Kosmos]

Last 4-th game of 2 set finished for draw. So Tkachenko won 2 set and now its draw after 2 sets.
But in this game Tkachenko played terrible move 1420, and got a bad position:


Golubeva - Tkachenko
white move.

Could Golubeva win here?

It's a draw... The reason is that 3 kings can't beat one....

[Eric van Dusseldorp]

Hoe kan iemand (14-20?) spelen?
Vrouwen blijven mysterieus.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Harm Wiersma in De Telegraaf van vandaag:

[J.Pawlicki]

almost ... ?
3rd set, one game left...
Tkachenko - Golubeva 4-2.


bth...
in my results summary i calculated only games from official events (WC/EC). Zoja won against Darya on 2006 during Minsk tournament!

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Ton Sijbrands en Zoja Goloebjewa,
WK Dames 1996 in Vught.
foto: Piet Lauwen

[J.Pawlicki]

Darya Tkachenko with 4th title!

It is interesting - it was 13th World Title match (women).
7-6 for challengers!
Also point score is negative for defending champions +20 =104 -28.

All world championship results and more ...

http://www.daminator.eu/2011_women_matc ... istory.pdf

[Eric van Dusseldorp]

Last 4-th game of 2 set finished for draw. So Tkachenko won 2 set and now its draw after 2 sets.
But in this game Tkachenko played terrible move 1420, and got a bad position:


Golubeva - Tkachenko
white move.

Could Golubeva win here?

No, 47-41 (21-26) 41-36 (3-8) 34-29 (26-31) 37x26 (27-32) 26-21(!) (22-27) 21-17 (32-37) 43-38 and (27-31), (27-32) or even (8-13) is a draw.

[Wieger Wesselink]

Some comments about the games can be found on http://10x10.org.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

[Hanco Elenbaas]

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Een bijdrage van Wladimir Wawilow uit Sebastopol:

A small addition to Wesselink's analysis of the deciding set. I was immediately surprised that he has not commented on 27...17-22 (!) (indicated Anikeyev). The Scholma's analysis have this move, Scholma writes:

27...18-23(?) Stronger than 27...17-22! 28.37-31 11-17. And after 29.46-41 9-13 30.41-37 4-9! unlikely white will be saved.

However, after 27...17-22! white has a strong paradoxical answer: 28.27-21! 22-27 29.21-17 11:22 30.32:21 9-13 31.21-16 18-23 32.43-39.

1) 32...12-17 33.46-41 23-29 (13-18? 34.38-32!+) 34.37-32 3-8 35.49-44 8-12 36.39-34!, 37.47-42!, 38.32- 27, 39.16x29, 40.33x42 19-23x23=.
2) 32...13-18, and again it becomes clear that black can not decisively strengthen the position.
2.1) 33.26-21 3-8 34.37-31 36:27 35.21:32 12-17

36.46-41 17-21x31 38.49-43 (38.41-36? 4-9!, 18-22! x 43+) ...31-36 with almost equal position, for example: 39.33-28 40.41-37 11-16 07.11 41.37-31! 36x27 42.32x21 23x32 (42...16x27 43.28-22 8-13 and 18-22=) 43.38x27 8-12 44.27-22 18x27 45.21x32 16-21 and so on.
2.2) 33.46-41

3-8 34.38-32!? 23-28 35.32:23 18:38 36.26-21 8-13 (36...38-42 37.37:48 12-18 38.41-37 18-23) 37.37-31 36:27 38.21:43 13-18 39.41- 37 18-23, and again black "is better, but no more."

The same maneuver (34.38-32) can be done in the case of 33...4-9; but if 33...4-10, than a first 34.26-21, and only then 37-31, 38-32 or as above, but not immediately 34.38-32? 23-29! 35.32-28 (16-11 is not), 36.28x8, 37.26-21 7-11! ... 39.21-17 1-6, and must give away a white checkers.

Briefly summarized, after 27...17-22 28.37-31? white is likely to lose, and if 28.27-21! gradually equalize the game.

28.33-28! 3-8.
The second «point noted» Scholma, - 29.30-25?
Scholma indicates that after 29.43-39!

whites would have been better, and gives two options:
29...11-16 (17-22? 30.27:20 14:43 31.38-33 43-48 32.33-29 48:31 33.26:37 9-14 34.35-30) 30.27-22! 17-21 31.26:17 12:21 32.22-18 23:12 33.28-23 19:28 34.30:10 4:15 35.32:23 +/-.

However, after 29...11-16 30.27-22 blacks played not 17-21?, but 30...7-11! 31.22-18 36-41* 32.18:20 14:43 33.47:36.

And after 33...43-48 - quick adjustment: 34.28-23 19x28 ... 36.36x27 8-13(!) 37.38-33 13-18 38.33-29 17-22 39.35-30 ... 16-21 41.30-24 12-17x8=;
but can be 33...19-24!, underlining the weakness of a short white flank:
2.1) 34.49-44 43-49 35.46-41 49:40 36.35:44 8-13 37.36-31 9-14 38.31-27 14-20 39.41-36 20-25=;
2.2) 34.38-33 9-13 35.49:38 13-19!, and to prevent the white can not break: 36.36-31 8-13 37.31-27 24-30 38.35:24 19:30

39.27-22! 13-19 (39...30-35 40.22-18! + -) 30-35 40.33-29 41.29-23, and easier to just 41...19-24 42.23-18 43.28:30 12:23 17:28 44.32:23 35:24=, although after 41...35-40 42.23:14 40-44 43.22-18 12:23 44.28:19 4-9 45.14:3 44-49 46.3:21 16:27 47.32:21 49:16 — remise.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Op het Shashki forum zijn inmiddels 50 pagina's gevuld over deze match, met veel links naar interviews, verslagen en dergelijke: http://www.shashki.com/PNphpBB2-viewtop ... r-dec.html

BabelFish vertaling in het Engels: http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_ur ... =Translate