Linkdump

[Koops]

Iedereen maakt fouten.

Dat is waar. En iedereen verdient een tweede kans. Maar de vraag die mij dan onmiddelijk bij mij opkomt is: heeft Mullins zich ooit gedistancieerd van dat stuk?

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Iedereen maakt fouten.

Dat is waar. En iedereen verdient een tweede kans. Maar de vraag die mij dan onmiddelijk bij mij opkomt is: heeft Mullins zich ooit gedistancieerd van dat stuk?

Dat weet ik niet. Ik hoop het wel, maar het is voor mij niet van ultiem belang of hij zich daarvan gedistantieerd heeft. Het lijkt me wel als je die lezing in Canada ziet. Siep Korteling kan dat misschien uitzoeken in de tijd dat ik me met waardevolle bijdragen van Mullins bezighou.

95% van de medische wetenschappers zegt de vreselijkste dingen over de homeopathie van Samuel Hahnemann, maar dat maakt de andere zaken waar ze over spreken nog niet betekenisloos.

Ook al heeft Eustace Mullins antisemitische uitspraken gedaan en ook al zou Mullins misschien nog steeds een rabiate antisemiet zijn, dan nog is zijn ongekend zorgvuldige onderzoek naar de ware toedracht van allerlei verborgen aangelegenheden voor mij van groot belang. Ik wil graag weten wie mijn ouders, grootouders, ooms en tantes in Jappenkampen bracht, wie de regie voerde toen familieleden van mijn joodse vriendinnen omgebracht werden in '40-'45. Ook wil ik weten wie de lastercampagne tegen de homeopathie en andere heilzame vormen van geneeskunde financiert. En het onderzoek van Ezra Pound en Eustace Mullins over The Fed en de farmaceutische industrie, gepubliceerd in The Secrets of The Federal Reserve (1952) en Murder by Injection (1988) is wat al dit soort zaken betreft dermate interessant, dat de strategie om de onthullingen in deze werken te besmeuren door Pound en Mullins voor antisemiet uit te maken bij mij niet meer helpt. Vooral dankzij de recente financiële kredietcrisis en de naar boven komende feiten rond 9/11 gaan in de Verenigde Staten veel oogjes open.

Ik hoop van harte dat Mullins op andere gedachten is gekomen dan de bizarre die in dat werkje van Siep Korteling naar boven zijn gekomen.

Maar James Dyer schreef het al:

"Eustace Mullins has been painted as many things by his detractors, many of whom have no idea what the word "patriot" actually means beyond the title of the Act that's almost made patriotism illegal. Agree or disagree with Eustace's conclusions, his detractors have never been able to paint him as a liar."

[Hanco Elenbaas]

De laatste pagina's van The Secrets of The Federal Reserve door Eustace Mullins, editie 1993:

Questions and Answers



While lecturing in many countries, and appearing on radio and television programs as a guest, the author is frequently asked questions about the Federal Reserve System. The most frequently asked questions and the answers are as follows:



Q: What is the Federal Reserve System?

A: The Federal Reserve System is not Federal; it has no reserves; and it is not a system, but rather, a criminal syndicate. It is the product of criminal syndicalist activity of an international consortium of dynastic families comprising what the author terms "The World Order" (see "THE WORLD ORDER" and "THE CURSE OF CANAAN", both by Eustace Mullins). The Federal Reserve system is a central bank operating in the United States. Although the student will find no such definition of a central bank in the textbooks of any university, the author has defined a central bank as follows: It is the dominant financial power of the country which harbors it. It is entirely private-owned, although it seeks to give the appearance of a governmental institution. It has the right to print and issue money, the traditional prerogative of monarchs. It is set up to provide financing for wars. It functions as a money monopoly having total power over all the money and credit of the people.



Q: When Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913, did the Congressmen know that they were creating a central bank?

A: The members of the 63rd Congress had no knowledge of a central bank or of its monopolistic operations. Many of those who voted for the bill were duped; others were bribed; others were intimidated. The preface to the Federal Reserve Act reads "An Act to provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial papers, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." The unspecified "other purposes" were to give international conspirators a monopoly of all the money and credit of the people of the United States; to finance World War I through this new central bank, to place American workers at the mercy of the Federal Reserve system’s collection agency, the Internal Revenue Service, and to allow the monopolists to seize the assets of their competitors and put them out of business.



Q: Is the Federal Reserve system a government agency?

A: Even the present chairman of the House Banking Committee claims that the Federal Reserve is a government agency, and that it is not privately owned. The fact is that the government has never owned a single share of Federal Reserve Bank stock. This charade stems from the fact that the President of the United States appoints the Governors of the Federal Reserve Board, who are then confirmed by the Senate. The secret author of the Act, banker Paul Warburg, a representative of the Rothschild bank, coined the name "Federal" from thin air for the Act, which he wrote to achieve two of his pet aspirations, an "elastic currency", read (rubber check), and to facilitate trading in acceptances, international trade credits. Warburg was founder and president of the International Acceptance Corporation, and made billions in profits by trading in this commercial paper. Sec. 7 of the Federal Reserve Act provides "Federal reserve banks, including the capital and surplus therein, and income derived therefrom, shall be exempt from Federal, state and local taxation, except taxes on real estate." Government buildings do not pay real estate tax.



Q: Are our dollar bills, which carry the label "Federal Reserve notes" government money?

A: Federal Reserve notes are actually promissory notes, promises to pay, rather than what we traditionally consider money. They are interest bearing notes issued against interest bearing government bonds, paper issued with nothing but paper backing, which is known as fiat money, because it has only the fiat of the issuer to guarantee these notes. The Federal Reserve Act authorizes the issuance of these notes "for the purposes of making advances to Federal reserve banks... The said notes shall be obligations of the United States. They shall be redeemed in gold on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States in the District of Columbia." Tourists visiting the Bureau of Printing and Engraving on the Mall in Washington, D.C. view the printing of Federal Reserve notes at this governmental agency on contract from the Federal Reserve System for the nominal sum of .00260 each in units of 1,000, at the same price regardless of the denomination. These notes, printed for a private bank, then become liabilities and obligations of the United States government and are added to our present $4 trillion debt. The government had no debt when the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913.



Q: Who owns the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks?

A: The dynastic families of the ruling World Order, internationalists who are loyal to no race, religion, or nation. They are families such as the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Rockefellers, the Harrimans, the Morgans and others known as the elite, or "the big rich".



Q: Can I buy this stock?

A: No. The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks cannot be bought or sold on any stock exchange. It is passed on by inheritance as the fortune of the "big rich". Almost half of the owners of Federal Reserve Bank stock are not Americans.



Q: Is the Internal Revenue Service a governmental agency?

A: Although listed as part of the Treasury Department, the IRS is actually a private collection agency for the Federal Reserve System. It originated as the Black Hand in mediaeval Italy, collectors of debt by force and extortion for the ruling Italian mob families. All personal income taxes collected by the IRS are required by law to be deposited in the nearest Federal Reserve Bank, under Sec. 15 of the Federal Reserve Act, "The moneys held in the general fund of the Treasury may be ....deposited in Federal reserve banks, which banks, when required by the Secretary of the Treasury, shall act as fiscal agents of the United States."



Q: Does the Federal Reserve Board control the daily price and quantity of money?

A: The Federal Reserve Board of Governors, meeting in private as the Federal Open Market Committee with presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks, controls all economic activity throughout the United States by issuing orders to buy government bonds on the open market, creating money out of nothing and causing inflationary pressure, or, conversely, by selling government bonds on the open market and extinguishing debt, creating deflationary pressure and causing the stock market to drop.



Q: Can Congress abolish the Federal Reserve System?

A: The last provision of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, Sec. 30, states, "The right to amend, alter or repeal this Act is expressly reserved." This language means that Congress can at any time move to abolish the Federal Reserve System, or buy back the stock and make it part of the Treasury Department, or to altar the System as it sees fit. It has never done so.



Q: Are there many critics of the Federal Reserve beside yourself?

A: When I began my researches in 1948, the Fed was only thirty-four years old. It was never mentioned in the press. Today the Fed is discussed openly in the news section and the financial pages. There are bills in congress to have the Fed audited by the Government Accounting Office. Because of my expose, it is no longer a sacred cow, although the Big Three candidates for President in 1992, Bush, Clinton and Perot, joined in a unanimous chorus during the debates that they were pledged not to touch the Fed.



Q: Have you suffered any personal consequences because of your expose of the Fed?

A: I was fired from the staff of the Library of Congress after I published this expose in 1952, the only person ever discharged from the staff for political reasons. When I sued, the court refused to hear the case. The entire German edition of this book was burned in 1955, the only book burned in Europe since the Second World War. I have endured continuous harassment by government agencies, as detailed in my books "A WRIT FOR MARTYRS" and "MY LIFE IN CHRIST". My family also suffered harassment. When I spoke recently in Wembley Arena in London, the press denounced me as "a sinister lunatic".

Q: Does the press always support the Fed?

A: There have been some encouraging defections in recent months. A front page story in the Wall Street Journal, Feb. 8, 1993, stated, "The current Fed structure is difficult to justify in a democracy. It’s an oddly undemocratic institution. Its organization is so dated that there is only one Reserve bank west of the Rockies, and two in Missouri...Having a central bank with a monopoly over the issuance of the currency in a democratic society is a very difficult balancing act."

Read: Congressman McFadden
on the Federal Reserve Corporation
Remarks in Congress, 1934
AN ASTOUNDING EXPOSURE
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html

[Hanco Elenbaas]

An Afternoon With Eustace Mullins

When did you first become aware of the ADL?

When Secrets of the Federal Reserve was printed finally, I had a little discussion group at the Library of Congress (I was working there at the time), it was very polyglot, blacks, students, a Jew...the Jewish boy said to me "This book is anti-semitic." I said "What're you talking about? There's no mention of Jews." He said "Oh no, the Anti-Defamation League..." (this was one of the first times I'd heard of the ADL) "...has publicly stated that it's an anti-semitic book." They've stuck to that since 1953 without ever citing one sentence that's anti-semitic in it.

Iedereen maakt fouten.

Dat is waar. En iedereen verdient een tweede kans. Maar de vraag die mij dan onmiddelijk bij mij opkomt is: heeft Mullins zich ooit gedistancieerd van dat stuk?

Nee, ik geloof niet dat Eustace Mullins spijt heeft van zijn antisemitisme. Zie bijvoorbeeld deel 9 en deel 10 van dit (boeiende) interview uit 2005.


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 1 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uU4nzIq4YKs&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uU4nzIq4YKs&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 2 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Drx2dBlJepw&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Drx2dBlJepw&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 3 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y7HQA_h6QDQ&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y7HQA_h6QDQ&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 4 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VIZbo_IAyaY&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VIZbo_IAyaY&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 5 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PUnwiDA2tVA&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PUnwiDA2tVA&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 6 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PyfKX1GN_jw&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PyfKX1GN_jw&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 7 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mPdXHquAoCA&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mPdXHquAoCA&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 8 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FHXV5x7Lk1E&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FHXV5x7Lk1E&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 9 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4AQjnUMUDfQ&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4AQjnUMUDfQ&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Eustace Mullins - The Neo-Zionist Order pt 10 of 10
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l9-K3_JjJV8&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l9-K3_JjJV8&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[Hanco Elenbaas]

crashrecovery.org



The Curse of Canaan, A Demonology of History

Recently a video interview was conducted, titled "The Neo-Zionist Order", where Mullins, with incredable insight and knowlegde, connects essential dots, with updates into the present day situation.

The Curse of Canaan, by Eustace Mullins is an astounding book which presents long forgotten history in a concise and efficient way and connects it to todays movements of Cabala en Freemasonry. Sadly enough the book doesn't have a Index, but while reading, references are mentioned. Here's how Mullins describes the creation of the Talmud, the Zorah and the Cabala:


page 40-43:
"Oriental despotism has become especially predominant in all of our
legal proceedings, the "court"[5] where the despot rules, the symbolic
bow, or standing, when the despot comes into the room, and the
refusal of the despot to brook any questioning of his decision by a
citizen, who can approach the judge only through an anointed
priesthood, the legal profession[6][7]. Some Americans optimistically
decide to come into court representing themselves, which the People
of Shem provided for specifically in their Constitution of the
United States, but judges usually give such "attorneys pro se"
short shrift.

In states such as Virginia, where Masonic power rules the courts,
judges have been known to boast that no attorney pro se will ever
get a favorable decision in their court. A non-Mason who enters an
American court today is placing himself at the mercy of an Oriental
despot, hence the tyrannical actions of judges in sentencing to
indeterminate prison sentences anyone who happens to displease
them, or whose property is coveted by a Mason.

This Oriental type of despotism can be traced back to Zoroaster in
Persia, to Ishtar and Tammuz in Babylon, to the graeco-Thracian
Mysteries at Eleusis, the Mysteries of Demeter, Persephone, and
Dionysus; to Cybele and Altis in Phrygia; to Aphrodite and Adonis
in Syria; to Isis ans Osiris in Egypt; and to Mithra in Persia [8].

These Mystery cults were formally combined into much of the text of
the Babylonian Talmud, a book of religious precepts which had been
formulated after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C. Nebuchadnezzar
took his people to Babylon as captives from 586 to 537 B.C., after
which Cyrus of Persia captured Babylon and authorized the return to
Jerusalem. During the Babylonian captivity, there was a free
admixture of the various Canaanite tribes; the Edomites
intermarried with the Canaanite branch of Judahites and others.
Edom means red; ever since the Captivity, red has meant revolution
and Canaanite massacre of the innocents. The Rothschild's, when they
backed the formation of the Illuminati, changed their name from
Bauer to Roth (red) schild (shield). This inter-mixture of various
strains caused a great deal of confusion among the offspring as to
what their customs should be. To resolve this difficulty, the
captives began to compile a great book of religious teachings.

Talmud means "teaching" in Hebrew. By the second century A.D., the
Talmud had been completed as oral law, the Mishnah, or older part,
and the Gemara, or commentary on the law. It first appeared in
print in 1520, when Daniel Bomberg published it in Venice [4].

Because of its origins in the demon-worshiping capital of the
world, Babylon, demonology plays an important part throughout the
text of the Talmud. It refers to the Demiurge, or Chief Demon, as
the Creator of the Universe, and it defines the various appearances
of demons as (1) mazzikem; (2) shedim; (3) ruhot (Avot. 5-6).
Asmodeus is listed as the King of the Demons (Pes. 110a-112b).

The Mishnah taught in the second century B.C. that two things
should never be revealed to the public, or the uninitiated: (1) the
work of creation, and (2) the work of the chariot (meaning esoteric
operations, the "Divine Throne"). These precepts later became
further formalized in the secret rites of Freemasonry.


In 1280 A.D., a further development of Talmudic thought, the Zohar,
or Book of Splendour, appeared. This was known as the Cabal, or
tradition. It was based on two things: (1) generation, or the
fertility rites, as the most sacred word in the new instructions
(which, of course, also became the "G" featured in Masonic
symbols), and (2) the precept that Israel alone is to possess the
future world (Vayschleh folio 177b).

The Zohar derived from the Sefer Yetsirah, or Book of Creation,
which had appeared in the Babylon of the third century; the ten
Sephiroth or numbers, based on the belief that the universe derives
from the ten numbers and two letters of the Hebrew alphabet; this
later was developed into the twenty-two trumps of Tarot, or the
twenty-two Paths which lead to Sephotorth.

In Cabala(*)[9], evil takes on a mysterious existence of its own,
which its precepts trace back to the physical appearance of life on
earth, or Adam. Cabala claims that Adam throws the entire stream
of life out of balance, and that the Church, or Christianity, by
formalizing the physical existence of the Adamite people on earth,
have become a problem which must be resolved. This is the essence
of the basic anti-life principle underlying all Cabala and its
heir, Freemasonry. These precepts declare that Satanism will
achieve its final triumph over the Church and Christianity, thus
ending the "dualism" of this world, the struggle between good and
evil. In short, the problem of good and evil will be ended when
evil triumphs and good is eliminated from the earth. This program
may sound somewhat simplistic, but it is the basic premise of the
Cabala and Freemasonry.

These anti-life precepts are now to be encountered, and dealt with,
in many of the developments of our civilization. The descendants of
the Canaanites instinctively hate and actively oppose such progress
as technology, urban life, industrialism, and the cultural
achievements of humanity. Their basic goal is to return earth to
the primitivism of its pre-Adamic state, when a Neanderthal type of
human roamed at will over an earth which had no "civilized" aspects
to remind him of his primitivism. The end purpose is to "restore"
pre-Adamic man, so that Adamite man, as a creation of God, no
longer presents an obstacle to Satan and his rule over this world.
Thus cabbalistic Freemasonry aims for the extermination of life [12][13]
as we know it, culminating in the final triumph of the Canaanite Curse
on this earth. In retrospect this amazing observation offers an
irrefutable reason for the otherwise inexplicable massacres, wars,
and human devastation which have been regularly visited upon a
long-suffering humanity by the Canaanite conspirators.

(*) Cabala appears in various spellings through history, principally
"Cabala." Also Kabbalah, Kabala, etc."

page 64:
"Continuous damage is done to the entire economy by the existence
of a small, supersecret group which controls all advancement in
business and the professions, which control the issuance of bank
loans, entering into a publishing business such as books,
magazines, or newspapers, operating a radio and television station,
chartering a bank, and many avenues of trade.

Parents always want the best possible future for their children,
making great sacrifices to put them through school and to send them
to college. They never realize that without the "Open Sesame" of
the Masonic Order, their children are condemned to be hewers of
wood and drawers of water, that they can never hope to earn any
large sums or to make advancements in their field. Everything is
already pre-empted by the Canaanites for their own kind. Only the
children of the conspiratorial elite will be admitted to the best
schools, be offered the best jobs, and live the good life. For the
rest of America, the party is over."


[1] "The Curse of Canaan, A Demonology of History"
by Eustace Mullins, Copyright (c)1987 Eustace Mullins
Product Details:
ISBN: none
Format: Hardcover, 242pp
Pub. Date: February 1987
Publisher: REVELATION BOOKS, P.O. Box 11105 Staunton, VA 24401


The Curse of Canaan (Paperback)
by Eustace Mullins,
Product Details:
Paperback: 242 pages
Publisher: Fix America Books (March 5, 2007)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0978651715
ISBN-13: 978-0978651718
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0978651715


[2] "THE TREASON DEBATE: EZRA POUND AND HIS ROME RADIO BROADCASTS"
by Jonas Doberman
http://www.tcr.org/tcr/essays/EPrize_Pound.pdf


[3] Books by Eustace Mullins
http://www.whale.to/b/mullins_h.html


[4] The Babylonian Talmud
translated by MICHAEL L. RODKINSON
Book 10 (Vols. I and II) [1918] The History of the Talmud
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/t10/index.htm


[5] "Supreme Injustice : How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000"
by Alan M. Dershowitz
Paperback: 288 pages
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (November 14, 2002)
Language: English
ISBN: 0195158075
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/019515 ... 73-0067935


[6] "Defrauding America, 4th ed. Volume One : A Trojan Horse Legacy"
by Rodney Stich, former federal agent
Paperback: 557 pages
Publisher: Diablo Western Press (December 28, 2005)
Language: English
ISBN: 0932438180
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/093243 ... 86-6589749
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/


[7] "Defrauding America, 4th Ed. Volume Two : A Trojan Horse Legacy"
by Rodney Stich, former federal agent
Paperback: 430 pages
Publisher: Diablo Western Press (December 28, 2005)
Language: English
ISBN: 0932438199
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/093243 ... 86-6589749
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/


[8] "Atlantis, Alien Visitation & Genetic Manipulation"
by Michael Tsarion, ancient occult researcher
Paperback: 440 pages
Publisher: Angels at Work Publishing, Santa Clara (2004)
Language: English
ISBN: none
http://www.taroscopes.com/products/atlantisbook.html
The Destruction Of Atlantis [Michael Tsarion]
The Origins of Evil [Michael Tsarion]

[9] "The Illuminati(R) Vol.II, THE ANTICHRIST CONSPIRACY",
a film by Chris Everard, (c)www.EnigmaTV.com 2006
http://www.antichristdvd.com/, http://www.enigmatv.com/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... RACY&hl=en


[10] "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve - The London Connection"
by Eustace Mullins
Paperback : 227 pages
Publisher: Bankers Research Institute (1985)
Language: English
ASIN: B000EACCBG
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000EA ... 32-7200126
http://www.whale.to/b/mullins5.html
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm


[11] "The Neo-Zionist Order, Who Rules your Rulers"
video interview with Eustace Mullins, 1 hr 38 min 40 sec - 14-Oct-2006
Produced by AOH Productions, http://www.arsenalofhypocrisy.com/
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid= ... ce+mullins


[12] "The Population Control Agenda"
by Dr. Stanley K. Monteith, M.D. (c)1996
P.O. Box 1835
Soquel, CA 95073
http://www.radioliberty.com/pca.htm
http://crashrecovery.org/canaan/pca.pdf


[13] "None Dare Call It Genocide"
by Dr. Stanley K. Monteith, M.D.
Radio Liberty Conference (c)2004
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... t+Genocide

[Hanco Elenbaas]

De Pers, 16 oktober 2008

Naomi Wolf: Het einde van de VS

‘Amerika is vervallen tot schurkenstaat’

Door: Lars Anderson



Naomi Wolf


Schrijfster Naomi Wolf (45) doet verwoede pogingen om het Amerikaanse volk te waarschuwen voor de machthebbers in het Witte Huis. Zij beramen een ordinaire staatsgreep. ‘Als McCain en Palin gekozen worden, is dat het einde van de vrije verkiezingen.’

Naomi Wolf, schrijfster van bestseller De mythe van de schoonheid, boegbeeld van de derde feministische golf, activiste en grondlegger van de American Freedom Campaign, twijfelt niet: er is een staatsgreep gaande in het land dat zich voordoet als de ideale democratie.

Twee verontrustende boeken heeft ze geschreven: Het einde van Amerika: brief aan een jonge patriot, dat onlangs in Nederland verscheen en het nog onvertaalde vervolgboek Give me Liberty; a Handbook for American Revolutionaries. Daarin beschrijft ze de ontwikkelingen die de open Amerikaanse samenleving langzaam veranderen in een gesloten autoritair systeem. En die nu, in de aanloop naar de presidentsverkiezingen, een climax bereiken.

'McCain doet er niet toe'
Bevlogen vertelt ze telefonisch vanuit New York hoe donkere wolken zich boven haar land samenpakken: ‘Als John McCain en Sarah Palin in november gekozen worden, is dat het einde van de vrije, democratische verkiezingen in Amerika. McCain doet er niet toe. Hij heeft volgens dermatologen een hardnekkige vorm van huidkanker en nog maar twee tot vier jaar te leven. Als hij sterft, is Palin de nieuwe, maar o zo plooibare president. Met haar aan het hoofd zal de Amerikaanse politiestaat sterker worden.’

Palin is volgens Wolf de ‘FrankenBarbie’ van de Republikeinse strateeg Karl Rove en vicepresident Dick Cheney. Zij zijn de leiders van een bende die de macht in Amerika wil overnemen. Ze leken even uit beeld door hun innige band met de impopulaire president George W. Bush. Tot Time Magazine meldde dat Rove zich bij het McCain-team had gevoegd en Politico erachter kwam dat hij een grote rol speelde in de keuze voor Palin. Wolf: ‘Er zwermen tientallen Rove- adepten om Palin heen die elke beweging regisseren. Ze verdedigt constant het Rove/Cheney-beleid, ze rakelt de oude leugens over 9/11 en Irak op, en ze drijft de spot met Barack Obama omdat hij het martelprogramma wil stoppen. Dit is niet McCains beleid, dit zijn de ideeën van Rove en Cheney.’

Wolf is bang: ‘Alles wat ik heb voorspeld, komt uit. Al acht maanden roep ik: ‘Let op, dichter bij de verkiezingen gaan we meer instabiliteit en grotere crisissen zien.’ Oh boy, zie de economische crisis. Soms hoop je dat je geen gelijk krijgt.’

Economische crisis, instabiliteit; maar wat heeft dat met een staatsgreep te maken? Wolf: ‘Een grote crisis is cruciaal om een open democratie te veranderen in een angstige, gesloten samenleving. Het is stap één van in totaal tien stappen die een would-be dictator moet ondernemen om meer macht te krijgen: creëer een interne of externe dreiging.’

Fascistische elite
De tien stappen (zie links) die Wolf in haar boek Het einde van Amerika aankaart, zijn een blauwdruk voor elke fascistische elite die een autoritair systeem wil ontwikkelen. ‘Alle despoten van de twintigste eeuw creëerden of gebruikten economische instabiliteit om over te gaan tot nationalisering van grote delen van de economie’, aldus Wolf.

En plots was daar, zes weken voor de verkiezingen, het bail out plan van de Amerikaanse minister van Financiën Henry Paulson. Wolf: ‘Sorry, maar hij vroeg een blanco cheque van 700 miljard dollar? Zijn ze gek geworden! Met dat geld, onder die voorwaarden, kun je de markt gijzelen. Sterker, zo veel geld in combinatie met een militair apparaat is een vrijbrief voor een legitieme coup.’


Karl Rove | EPA/AUDE GUERRUCC

De manier waarop de Bush-administratie het bail out (later rescue) plan erdoor probeerde te drukken, lijkt volgens Wolf sterk op de reactie na de terroristische aanslagen in september 2001. Hype de crisis, zaai angst en druk er een wet door die onder normale omstandigheden nooit zou worden goedgekeurd. Wolf: ‘Toen werd de controversiële US Patriot Actaangenomen. De meeste Congresleden hadden amper tijd er over te debatteren, velen hadden het niet eens gelezen.’ Dat hadden ze achteraf liever wel gedaan: de Patriot Act geeft de overheid het recht om telefoons af te luisteren, e-mailberichten door te spitten en vertrouwelijke dossiers van advocaten, psychiaters of doktoren op te eisen. Wolf: ‘De Congresleden werden in 2001 met de rug tegen de muur gezet. Tegenstemmen was onpatriottisch en gold als landverraad.’

Bailout
Dezelfde tactiek werd bij de bail out gebruikt. Wolf: ‘Congreslid Brad Sherman bekende op 2 oktober dat hem en andere Congresleden in privégesprekken is verteld dat als zij tegen de bail out zouden stemmen, de regering de noodtoestand (martial law) zou uitroepen. Vind je het gek dat de congresleden zo passief zijn? Ze zijn bang! En dat zouden ze moeten zijn, want volgens Mark Crispin Miller, een hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van New York, worden ze systematisch afgeluisterd.’

Economische crisis, instabiliteit, Congresleden onder druk en een cheque van 700 miljard. Maar nogmaals, waar is de staatsgreep? Wolf: ‘Sarah Palin roept voortdurend: ‘We zijn in crisismodus, we zijn in crisismodus.’ Bush roept: ‘We zijn in crisismodus.’ En let op, de Defense Authorization Act van 2007 geeft de president de macht om op eigen houtje de noodtoestand uit te roepen. Is het dan toeval dat de 1e brigade van de derde infanterie is teruggehaald uit Irak en sinds 1 oktober wordt ingezet op Amerikaans grondgebied? Het staat gewoon op de site van The Army Times! Voor het eerst sinds 1807 bewaken drie- tot vierduizend soldaten onze straten, onder het mom van crowd control. In theorie kunnen we morgen wakker worden en militairen op wacht zien staan voor overheidsgebouwen, waar ze stemregistratiegroepen of Congresleden intimideren.’

Vijandelijke strijder
Maar er zijn toch wetten die dat voorkomen? Wolf: ‘Dat is nog wat me het meest beangstigt. Door de War on Terror is Bush er in geslaagd om juridisch vast te leggen dat de hele wereld een slagveld is, inclusief Amerika. En als er militaire troepen op Amerikaans grondgebied rondlopen en Amerika is een slagveld, waarom zouden de militaire wetten dan niet de burgerwetten vervangen? En wat weerhoudt het leger ervan onschuldige Amerikanen op te pakken?’ Sinds de Military Commissions Act uit 2006 kan de president zoiets zelf bepalen. Als Bush zegt dat jij een ‘vijandelijke strijder’ bent, kan hij je zonder proces laten oppakken en het land uitvliegen naar een geheime gevangenis, waar hij je volgens de wet drie jaar lang mag martelen. Amerika is vervallen tot schurkenstaat.’


Cheney en Bush | EPA/TIM SLOAN

Meldingen over onderdrukking of mishandeling door autoriteiten komen steeds vaker binnen. Wolf: ‘Ik hoef niet meer te zoeken. De berichten komen naar mij toe. Journalisten worden gearresteerd en er vinden massa-arrestaties plaats tijdens vreedzame demonstraties. Zoals bij de Republikeinse conventie: mensen werden mishandeld, opnameapparatuur ontvreemd. Later dook alsnog een filmpje op van de mishandelingen. De filmer kon de tape nog net begraven voor hij werd opgepakt.’

Wolf heeft geen idee waarom dit soort verhalen nooit de belangrijke media bereiken. ‘Kijk, dat media als Fox News dat niet melden, begrijp ik wel. Die zijn op de hand van het Witte Huis. Maar kranten als The New York Times of The Washington Post? Het verbijstert me telkens weer. Ik kan het niet anders verklaren dan dat de signalen zó overduidelijk zijn, dat het eenvoudiger is dit soort gebeurtenissen te negeren of te rationaliseren. Er zit een kinderlijke redenering achter: dit gebeurt toch niet echt?’

Verkiezingssabotage
Wolf doet alles wat ze kan om straks verkiezingssabotage tegen te gaan. ‘Het grote probleem is om de stemmen geteld te krijgen. Er komt steeds meer bewijs dat de verkiezingen van 2000 gestolen zijn, evenals de cruciale staat Ohio in 2004. Zelfs John Kerry gelooft nu dat de Republikeinen hem zijn presidentschap hebben ontnomen. Ik heb een oproep gedaan voor burgercontroles: één miljoen mensen probeer ik bij elkaar te krijgen die gaan kijken of alles bij de stemkantoren eerlijk verloopt.’

‘Hey, ik heb nog een idee! Waarom nodigen we geen troepen van de Verenigde Naties uit om de vrede te bewaren in deze instabiele tijd. Kunnen ze meteen als waarnemers worden ingezet voor de verkiezingen. Zodra we uitgepraat zijn, ga ik meteen een opiniestuk schrijven!’

Maar of zélfs dat genoeg is om de roversbende van Rove en Cheney van de macht af te krijgen, weet Wolf niet. Wel weet ze dat dit Amerika’s laatste kans is om een open democratie te blijven. Daarna zal het volgens haar nooit meer hetzelfde zijn.

[steenslag]

Heb je een heel debat lang je best gedaan om je waardig te gedragen, loop je per ongeluk na afloop de verkeerde kant op. Je herstelt je nog net en dan kom je zo op de foto :

http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow ... 10910.jpg/

[composite]

Heb je een heel debat lang je best gedaan om je waardig te gedragen, loop je per ongeluk na afloop de verkeerde kant op. Je herstelt je nog net en dan kom je zo op de foto :

http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow ... 10910.jpg/

Tsja, je kunt heel lang verbergen dat je geen hersens bent, maar op een gegeven moment loopt het toch verkeerd...

[Eric van Dusseldorp]

Op meer foto's heeft hij de tong uit de mond.
Nou ja, je kan er wereldkampioen dammen mee worden.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Waarom berichten onze landelijke sufferdjes NRC Handelsblad en de Volkskrant nooit over de kwaadaardige parasiet The Federal Reserve?
Een kennis schrijft daar dit over:

De Volkskrant bericht: 'Banken moeten wel aankloppen bij minister Bos. Op de beurs wordt druk gespeculeerd over de banken en verzekeraars die steun bij minister Bos van Financiën moeten aanvragen.... '

Bijna goed, behalve dan dat er had moeten staan 'Op de beurs wordt druk gespeculeerd met banken en verzekeraars.' Maar zover is de Volkskrant nog niet. Deze informatie past niet in de consensus.

In De staat in de kapitalistische maatschappij schreef de Britse geleerde Ralph Miliband: 'De hele structuur van economische en politieke overheersing die wij tot hiertoe hebben geanalyseerd, is in de westerse politieke systemen afhankelijk van de steun, of in ieder geval de stilzwijgende instemming van degenen die eraan onderworpen zijn. De lagere en "intermediaire" klassen moeten ertoe gebracht worden de bestaande sociale orde te aanvaarden, en hun eisen en aspiraties binnen de daardoor gestelde grenzen te stellen. Niets is zo belangrijk voor de heersende klassen als dit punt, dat voortdurend de aandacht vraagt, omdat het in het wezen van het systeem van overheersing ligt, dat men nooit zeker kan zijn van een eenmaal behaald succes.' Vandaar dat u mijn collega's de laatste tijd zo hard ziet zwoegen. Het legitimeringsprocces moet telkens weer als de natuurlijke gang van zaken worden afgeschilderd. En dat is een hele klus.

<center>
Eustace Mullins met The World Order </center>

De boeken van Mullins zijn collectors items geworden en de prijzen rijzen de pan uit sinds men er in de Verenigde Staten dankzij de kredietcrisis achterkomt hoe ons bankwezen en monetair stelsel geordend zijn. Op Antiqbook betaal je snel $200 voor een 'Secrets of The Federal Reserve' en momenteel moet je liefst 8500 Canadese dollars neertellen om een speciaal exemplaar uit 1952 te bemachtigen.

MULLINS, EUSTACE CLARENCE A Study of the Federal Reserve FIRST PRINTING, SIGNED AND INSCRIBED BY AUTHOR TO DEDICATEE OF LATER PRINTINGS, GEORGE STIMPSON (later reprinted as 'The Secrets of the Federal Reserve')
New York, Kasper and Horton. 1952, First Edition. Soft Cover, 8vo - over 7¾" - 9¾" tall. Neatly signed and inscribed by author to George Stimpson upon title page. Signed by Mr. Stimpson inside front cover. Subsequent printings of this work were dedicated to "Two of the finest scholars of the twentieth century, George Stimpson and Ezra Pound, who generously gave of their vast knowledge to a young writer to guide him in a field which he could not have managed alone.. The research (for this work) at the Library of Congress was directed and reviewed daily by George Stimpson, founder of the National Press Club in Washington, whom the New York Times on September 28, 1952 called 'A highly regarded reference source in the capital.. Government officials, Congressman, and reporters went to him for information on any subject'.. This work was the first nationally circulated revelation of the secret meetings of the international bankers at Jekyll Island, Georgia, 1907-1910, at which place the draft of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was written." - from Foreward to 1991 reprint. Average wear and soiling. Binding intact. Contents unmarked. An important piece of Americana. Good. SIGNED.
CAD 8500.00 [Appr.: EURO 5287.25]

Maar geïnteresseerden kunnen sinds enkele maanden ook terecht op eBay waar een achterneef van Eustace Mullins de boeken van zijn oudoom voor schappelijke prijzen verhandelt.

Van The World Order van de inmiddels 85-jarige Eustace Mullins zijn twee edities verschenen. De eerste in 1985, de tweede, uitgebreide in 1992.

Het hoofdstuk Business in America is in de tweede druk vrijwel ongewijzigd gebleven. Op Internet is het alleen te vinden als hoofdstuk 4 uit de eerste editie van 1985. Mullins vertelt aan wie we al die economische crisissen en vele oorlogen te danken hebben.

Eustace Mullins - The World Order, A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism

chapter 4: Business of America

John Moody, author of many standard reference works on American finance, stated in McClure’s Magazine, Aug., 1911, “The Seven Men,”

“Seven men in Wall Street now control a great share of the fundamental industry and resources of the United States. Three of the seven men, J.P. Morgan, James Stillman, and George F. Baker, head of the First National Bank of New York, belong to the so-called Morgan group; four of them, John D. and William Rockefeller, James Stillman, head of the National City Bank, and Jacob H. Schiff of the private banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb Co., to the so-called Standard Oil National City Bank group ... the central machine of capital extends its control over the U.S..... The process is not only economically logical; it is now practically automatic.”

What was true in 1911 is even more true in 1984; the seven men are now, as then, merely American agents for London interests. In 1919, Moody wrote in “Masters of Capital”, “All of the great bankers began as dry goods traders, including Junius S. Morgan.” Beebe Morgan was a dry goods house. J.M. Beebe Co. of Boston made Junius S. Morgan a partner. Junius Morgan was later invited to join George Peabody & Co. of London, which handled most of the House of Rothschild’s trading in American stocks. Junius Morgan’s son, J.P. Morgan, later changed the name of the firm to J.P. Morgan & Co., but it continued to one of three representatives of the House of Rothschild in the U.S., the others being Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and August Belmont.

The Morgan group and the National City Bank group held a secret meeting at Jekyl Island, Ga. the week of Nov. 22, 1910 to consolidate their financial power. Present were Sen. Nelson Aldrich (his daughter married John D. Rockefeller Jr.), his private secretary, Shelton, A. Piatt Andrews, Asst. Sec. of the Treasury, Frank Vanderlip, president National City Bank, Henry P. Davison, J.P. Morgan’s righthand man, Charles D. Norton, pres. First National Bank of New York, Benjamin Strong of Liberty Natl. Bank (he later married the daughter of the president of Bankers Trust, became president of Bankers Trust, and chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) and Paul Warburg, a German immigrant who had joined Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

Although these men were the most influential financiers in the U.S., they were present at Jekyl Island merely as the emissaries of Baron Alfred Rothschild, who had commissioned them to prepare legislation establishing a central bank in the U.S., modelled on the European fractional reserve central banking organizations of the Reichsbank, the Bank of England, and the Bank of France, all of which were controlled by the House of Rothschild.

To enact the Federal Reserve Act into the law of the land, the bankers elected Woodrow Wilson president of the U.S. in 1912 by splitting the Republican Party, defeating the popular William Howard Taft by financing Theodore Roosevelt’s malicious Bull Moose third party candidacy. Wilson’s academic career at Princeton had been financed by gifts from Cleveland H. Dodge, director of National City Bank, and Moses Taylor Pyne, grandson and heir of the founder of National City Bank. Wilson then signed an agreement not to go to any other college. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated through Congress as the Glass-Owen bill, backed by two Democrats, Congressman Carter Glass of Virginia, and Sen. Robert Owen of Oklahoma. Owen was persuaded to back the bill by Samuel Untermyer, who had cultivated him while acting as counsel for the Pujo Money Trust investigation. Untermyer flattered Owen by entertaining him at Greystone, his palatial Hudson River estate. Untermyer claimed to be a “progressive Democrat”, although he lived in feudal splendor, employing 167 men to tend his expanse of orchids and greenhouses. At Greystone, Owen dined with Paul Warburg, Bernard Baruch, and other financiers who had been instructed to get the Federal Reserve Act passed. Owen, a former Indian agent who knew little about finance, was easily persuaded by Paul Warburg’s doctrinaire pronunciamentos about “our antiquated banking system”, which must be brought up to par with the more modern banking system of Europe.

After the Federal Reserve Act had been passed by Congress and signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson, six New York banks controlled by the Morgan-Standard Oil group bought controlling interest of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which they have held ever since. The May 19, 1914 organization chart of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows that of the 203,053 shares issued, National City Bank took 30,000 shares; the Morgan-Baker First National Bank took 15,000 shares. These two banks merged into the present Citibank in 1955, giving them one-fourth of the shares in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The $134 billion Citicorp is now the largest bank in the U.S. The National Bank of Commerce of which Paul Warburg was a large shareholder, took 21,000 shares; Hanover Bank (now Manufacturers Hanover, of which Lord Rothschild is a director,) took 10,200 shares; Chase National Bank took 6000 shares; Chemical Bank took 6000 shares. These six banks in 1914 owned 40% of the stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Federal Reserve System printout of shareholders July 26, 1983 showed that they now own 53%, as follows: Citibank 15%; Chase Manhattan 14%; Morgan Guaranty Trust 9%; Manufacturers Hanover 7%; Chemical Bank 8%. Citicorp Citibank is No. 1 in size in the U.S. No. 3 is Chase Manhattan with $82 billion assets; No. 4 is Manufacturers Hanover, $64 billion; No. 5 is J.P. Morgan, $58 billion; No. 6 Chemical Bank. No. 11 is First Chicago, formerly First National Bank of Chicago, controlled by the Baker-Morgan interests. House Rept.159362, p.183, notes, “Next to Baker and Son, Morgan & Co. is the largest stockholder of First National (of New York), owning 14,500 shares; Baker and Morgan together own 40,000 of the 100,000 shares of First National Bank.”

The New York Times, Sept. 3, 1914, at the time of the Federal Reserve stock was being sold, showed the principal stockholders of these banks as follows: National City Bank – 250,000 shares of which James Stillman owned 47,498; J.P. Morgan & Co., 14,500; W. Rockefeller 10,000; M.T. Pyne 8267; Percy Pyne 8267; J.D. Rockefeller 1750; J.S. Rockefeller 100; W.A. Rockefeller 10; J.P. Morgan Jr. 1000. National Bank of Commerce, 250,000 shares – George F. Baker 10,000; J.P. Morgan Co. 7800; Mary W. Harriman, (widow E.H.) 5650; Paul Warburg 3000; Jacob Schiff 1000; J.P. Morgan Jr. 1100. Chase Natl. Bank – George F. Baker 13,408. Hanover Natl. Bank – James Stillman 4000; William Rockefeller 1540.

During a period when thousands of U.S. banks have gone bankrupt since 1914, these banks, protected by their interest in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, have grown steadily. A Senate Report, “Interlocking Directorates among the Major U.S. Corporations, a staff study of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs,” June 15, 1978, shows that five of these aforementioned banks held a total of 470 interlocking directorates in the 130 major corporations of the U.S., an average of 3.6 directors per major U.S. Corporation. This massive report is worthy of anyone’s detailed study; we can only give the totals here:

CITICORP 97 directorates
J.P. MORGAN CO. 99 directorates
CHEMICAL BANK 96 directorates
CHASE MANHATTAN 89 directorates
MANUFACTURERS HANOVER 89 directorates
Total 470

This centralized control over American industry by five New York banks controlled from London suggests that instead of 130 major U.S. corporations, we may have only one, which in itself is an outpost of the London Connection.

In the early 19th century, the House of Rothschild established a number of affiliates in the U.S. which carried the code identification of City banks, or City companies, identifying them as originating in the financial centre, the City of London. The City Bank was established in New York in 1812, in the same room in which the Bank of the United States had operated until its charter expired. Later called the National City Bank, its principal for fifty years was Moses Taylor, whose father had been a confidential agent for John Jacob Astor and British intelligence. Like the Morgan-Peabody operation, Moses Taylor doubled his fortune in the Panic of 1837 by purchasing stock in the depressed market with capital advanced by N.M. Rothschild of London. During the Panic of 1857, while many of its competitors failed, City Bank prospered. Moses Taylor purchased the outstanding stock of Delaware Lackawanna Railroad for $5 a share during the panic. Seven years later, it was worth $240 a share. He was now worth $50 million. His son-in-law, Percy Pyne, had come from London to work at City Bank, and married Taylor’s daughter. When Taylor died in 1882, he left $70 million. His son-in-law, now paralyzed, became president of the now National City Bank. John D. Rockefeller’s brother William invested in the bank, and persuaded Pyne to step aside in 1891 in favor of James Stillman, Rockefeller’s associate, to become president. William’s son William married Stillman’s daughter Elsie; his other son Percy married Stillman’s daughter Isabelle. James Stillman also had a London connection – his father, Don Carlos, had been a Rothschild agent in Brownsville, Texas and a successful blockade runner during the Civil War.

The National City Bank acquired several subsidiaries in New York, the National City Co., later renamed the City Co., and City Bank Farmers Trust Co.

The dominance of the Morgan-Kuhn Loeb financial power in New York is shown by a Dow Jones report in the New York Times Feb. 11, 1928 that of total offerings of bonds in 1927, J.P. Morgan was first with $502,590,000; National City Co. was second with $435,616,000; Kuhn Loeb was third with $423,988,000. On July 3,1929, the New York Times noted that Charles A. Peabody had joined the boards of National City Co. and City Bank Farmers Trust. On Aug. 4, 1932, the New York Times stated that National City Bank would issue its own currency against U.S. bonds carrying the circulatory power under the new Federal Home Loan Bank Act which empowered National City Bank to issue up to $124 million in currency. The National City Bank had now become a “bank of issue”, a function formerly reserved to central banks. On June 8, 1933, James H. Perkins, chmn National City Bank, announced the National City Co., would change its name to City Co. of New York. On Nov. 21, 1933, the National City Bank listed 31 affiliates including City Bank Farmers Trust, City Co. of New York, City Co. of Massachusetts, 44 Wall St. Co. and Cuban Sugar Plantations Inc.

On March 3, 1934, the New York Times announced that National City Bank would sell the National Bank of Haiti, a wholly owned subsidiary, on April 29, 1934. The Times also noted that National City Bank had organized United Aircraft Feb. 2, 1934, and that its subsidiary, City Bank Farmers Trust had celebrated its 112th anniversary on Feb. 28, 1929.

On June 27, 1934, the City Co. of New York was designated German bond scrip agent in the U.S. On May 22, 1933, City Co. of N.Y. announced its merger with Brown Bros. Harriman, with Joseph Ripley as chairman of the board. The company went through several name changes as Brown Harriman Co., Harriman Ripley, and is now Brown Bros. Harriman once more.

On March 4, 1934, Gen. Billy Mitchell, addressing the Foreign Policy Association, stated that National City Bank and its affiliates control aviation in this country. Allen W. Dulles, introduced as a “specialist in international affairs” announced the profits of international munitions makers were unconscionable.

On March 2, 1955, National City Bank announced it would purchase the stock of First National Bank for $165 million, $550 a share (in the 1929 boom, First National sold for $8600 share). Some market analysts believed the stock should have brought $750 a share in the 1955 sale, suggesting that the Baker family was no longer able to protect its interests. The resulting Citibank became the largest bank in the U.S., with a controlling interest in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. National City Bank had been in Hong Kong for eighty years; it has a $90 million Citibank Centre there. In 1983, 4% of its annual profits came from the Hong Kong operation, which is the center of the world’s drug trade.

Besides its controlling interest in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Rothschilds had developed important financial interests in other parts of the United States. The House Banking and Currency Committee Report May, 1976, “International Banking”, p. 60, identified the Rothschild Five Arrows Group and its present five branches: N.M. Rothschild & Sons Ltd. London; Banque Rothschild, France; Banque Lambert, Belgium; New Court Securities, N.Y.; Pierson, Holdring & Co., Amsterdam. These five were combined in a single bank, Rothschild Intercontinental Bank Ltd. The House Staff Report discloses that Rothschild Intercontinental Bank Ltd. has three principal American subsidiaries: National City Bank of Cleveland; First City National Bank of Houston (First City Bancorp); and Seattle First National Bank. These Rothschild subsidiaries were ranked in 1983 as follows: First City Bancorp Houston, 23rd in size in U.S., $17 billion assets; National City Corp. of Cleveland, 48th largest in U.S., $6.5 billion assets. National City Corporation of Cleveland has exercised a dominant role in Midwestern industry and politics for many years; First City Bancorp dominates Texas oil and heavy industry as well as Texas politics.

Lees verder in Mullins 'The World Order' op: Osdir Mail Archive of op Modern History Project.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

SIX Natural Cures for Cancer!
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pEGKT6UqzFs&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pEGKT6UqzFs&hl=nl&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[Hanco Elenbaas]

Telegraaf, 23 oktober 2008

Dollar grote winnaar van de kredietcrisis

Van een onzer verslaggevers


FRANKFURT – De dollar blijkt naast de Japanse yen de grote winnaar van de kredietcrisis. Gisteren zakte de euro terug tot $1,2740, het laagste niveau sinds november 2006. Het gaat hard; in de zomer noteerde de euro nog rond de $1,60, nu is de Europese eenheidsmunt dus tot onder de $1,30 teruggezakt. Economen gaan ervan uit dat de VS zich sneller herstellen van de recessie, terwijl die in Europa harder aankomt dan gedacht. Ook heeft de Amerikaanse centrale bank de rente al op 1,5% staan, de ECB heeft met 3,75% nog veel speelruimte naar beneden.

Volgens analisten kan de Europese Centrale Bank de komende maanden weinig anders doen dan de rente verlagen om de vastgelopen economie weer vlot te trekken. De meesten gaan ervan uit dat de Europese rente in het voorjaar op 3% staat.

Ook het Britse pond zat in een vrije val en zakte gisteren naar een stand van $1,6203, het laagste niveau sinds september 2003. De Engelse valuta staat onder druk door de verwachting dat de Britse centrale bank de rente zal verlagen om de economie voor een recessie te behoeden. De Britse centralebankpresident Mervyn King zei gisteren dat „Engeland nu in een recessie zit”.

Eerder deze maand verlaagde de ECB in een wereldwijd gecoördineerde renteverlaging het belangrijkste rentetarief in de eurozone al met een half procentpunt om de onrust op de financiële markten tegen te gaan. De Bank of Engeland deed toen ook mee. Analisten denken dat de rente in GrootBrittannië volgende maand weer met 0,5% omlaaggaat. De ECB kan dan de komende maanden volgen met kleinere stapjes van opgeteld 0,75%.





„Juist die potentiële rentedaling is de voornaamste reden dat de euro nu onder druk staat”, aldus de Duitse Commerzbank. „Het is ook weer het oude liedje, de Amerikaanse economie is flexibeler en herstelt sneller, Europa doet daar veel langer over.”

Ondertussen ontpoppen de dollar en de yen zich tot de grote winnaars van de kredietcrisis. Sinds de Amerikaanse zakenbank Lehman Brothers medio september omviel, won de dollar 9,3% op de euro. De vraag naar dollars is groot omdat Europese en Japanse banken zich jarenlang goedkoop herfinancierden in dollars. Nu bouwen ze hun schuldposities af, waardoor bij banken buiten de VS de vraag naar dollars drastisch is gestegen. Daarnaast vluchten investeerders momenteel uit riskante buitenlandse leningen (bijvoorbeeld India of Hongarije) en ín dollars. De centrale bank van Hongarije moest gisteren de rente met 3% verhogen tot 11,5% om de forint te ondersteunen.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

<center>John F. Kennedy: "A Warning From The Grave"
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4_4DnilEnF8&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4_4DnilEnF8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel New York City, April 27, 1961

The President and the Press

[Hanco Elenbaas]

<center>

Uit David Icke's 'Tales From The Time Loop' (2003), Appendix I, p 467-470:

Who really owns the United States, Canada, Britain, Ireland and much more besides?

The government and 'legal' system of the United States is controlled by the 'Crown'. As explained in chapter two, the Crown is not the British monarch as widely believed, but the 'City', an independent state in London. In turn, the 'City' or the 'Crown' is really the Knights Templar Church, also known as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, and this is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment. The Temple grounds are also home to the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row.

The Crown Temple controls the global 'legal' system, including those in the United States and Canada, because all Bar Associations are franchises of the International Bar Association at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple based at Chancery Lane in London. All Bar Associations' are franchises of the Crown and all Bar Attorneys throughout the world pledge a solemn oath to the Temple, even though some may not be aware that this is what they are doing.

Bar Association 'licensed' Attorneys must keep to their oath, pledge and terms of allegiance to the Crown Temple if they are to be "called to Bar" and work in the 'legal' profession. The 'ruling' monarch is also subordinate to the Crown Temple and has been so since the reign of King John in the 13th century when royal sovereignty was transferred to the Crown Temple and, through that, to the Roman Church.

King John (1167-1216) is a key to this story. It was at the Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court in January 1215 that King John was faced with the demands of the English barons to confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. When he signed the Magna Carta in 1215 history records this as an event that extended human freedom, but the real affect was very different as we shall see.

The 'governments' of the United States and Canada are other subsidiaries of the Crown Temple and so is the US 'central bank', the Federal Reserve. Indeed the global banking system is controlled by the Crown Temple as well as the 'legal' system.

Bar Associations are awarded their franchises by the four Inns of Court at Temple Bar. These are the Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn and they are nothing less than exclusive secret societies without charters or statutes. They are a law unto themselves.


<center>
Combined arms of the four Inns of Court.
Clockwise from top left: Lincoln's Inn, Middle Temple, Gray's Inn, Inner Temple.</center>


The Inner Temple controls the legal system franchise for Canada and Britain while the Middle Temple does the same for the United States. Queen Elizabeth II is a member of both temples. I have explained earlier in the book that the Illuminati always seek to control both 'sides' in any situation.

Thus at least five signatories to the American Declaration of Independence were Temple Bar Attorneys who had pledged allegiance to the Crown!

Another Middle Temple agent during the formation of the United States was Alexander Hamilton who structured the American banking system in line with the Crown Temple agenda for control of the new United States (a 'State' is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony!).

As Michael Edward points out in an excellent Internet study:

"Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.

"Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have worn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attorneys rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and ,contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but 'legal', Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts Our so-called 'judiciary' in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America."

Seven Middle Inn Templars who had pledged an oath of allegiance to the Crown Temple (including Alexander Hamilton) were among the members of the Constitutional Convention who signed the completed 'American Constitution'. How symbolic it is that copies of the American Constitution and the Declaration of Independence hang on the wall of the library of the Middle Temple in London. After all, they were the force behind both of them.

While Middle Bar Templars were orchestrating the illusion of freedom from the perceived rule by King George III, the king, too, was a sworn member of the same Middle Temple.

Michael Edward continues:

"1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name caIIed 'States' as direct possessive estates of the Crown.

"The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word 'State' to signify a 'legal estate of possession.'

Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word 'states'. By the use of 'State' the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America."

Britain and Ireland are owned by the Roman Church

So the United States, together with Canada, the United Kingdom and Ireland, are controlled by the Knights Templar 'Crown', but who owns the Knights Templar 'Crown'? Well, er..., the Pope, or rather the Illuminati that controls him. On May 15th 1213, our own friend King John, who was a puppet of the Templars, effectively signed away the Kingdom of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent III and the Roman Church, witnessed by the Crown Templars. As King John said at the time: "I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars." The King John charter stated:

"We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal .... not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our-lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances .. : we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his Catholic successors and the Roman church ... binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign ... we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession ... from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms ... the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling ... saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or anyone of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation-and concession shall always remain firm."

Historical accounts concentrate on the fact that this charter obligated the Crown to pay money to the Roman Church, but it also states that if the terms of this charter are broken, the 'right to the Kingdom' shall be lost. When King John signed the Magna Carta on June 15th 1215 he broke the terms of the charter with the Pope and therefore lost the right to his kingdom. Pope Innocent III then declared the Magna Carta null and void. From this time the 'Crown' passed from the monarch to the Knights Templar who, to this day, govern Britain on behalf of the Roman (Illuminati) Church. This means, if we take it a stage further, that ultimately, through the Crown Temple, the Roman Church also owns the United States, Canada and all countries and Bar Associations controlled (overtly or covertly) by the Crown! This is why the Peace Treaty between the American Colonies and the British Crown in 1783, stated:

"It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America ... "

How ironic that a Roman Catholic is barred from being the British monarch while all along the monarch and the 'kingdom' have been owned by the Roman Church.

And the Roman Church is the Church of Babylon.

[Hanco Elenbaas]

<center> <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T4R8lAjVzj0&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T4R8lAjVzj0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Tsar Bomba (Öàðü-áîìáà), literally "Emperor Bomb", is the Western name for the RDS-220 hydrogen bomb (codenamed "Èâàí" (Ivan) by its developers) — the largest, most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated. Developed by the Soviet Union, the bomb was originally designed to have a yield of about 100 megatons of TNT; however that was reduced by half in order to limit the amount of nuclear fallout that would result. Two bombs were built, a mock bomb and the real bomb, with the real bomb being tested on October 30, 1961, in the Novaya Zemlya archipelago. Despite testing, the weapon never entered service; it was simply a demonstration of the capabilities of the Soviet Union's military technology at that time. The mock bomb was stored in the Russian Nuclear Weapons Museum in Sarov.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1blRT2hi10&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1blRT2hi10&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

http://BrainMind.com Nuclear War: Atomic Explosions. Hydrogen Bombs Hiroshima: World War III. A documentary film by Rhawn Joseph. Ph.D. "Many of the nuclear scenes from this film, including nuclear blasts that did not appear in this film, can also be seen in the spectacular film "Trinity and Beyond" directed by Peter Kuran. We highly recommend this film." By Rhawn Joseph, Ph.D.