World Draughts Forum

The initial construction of N. Zaitsev's problem looks like this:

P.Shkludov (2-d USSR trade union championship -1989 )
Yunis Idris-Ogly Abdullaev, No.1-3 , 1989.
Akulich Alexey Borisovitch,No.No.4-6 Andreev Gennady Mihailovitch , No.No.7-9
Balaniuk Anatoly Grigorievitch , No. No. 10-22

Belousov V. V , No. No. 13-16

Ben Mihail Yuri evitch : No. No. 16-18
Vergeitchik Nikolai Grigorievitch, No. No. 19-21 No.20
Vladimir Volkov(Novokuznetsk) , No. No. 22-24
***********************
Nickolay Daki, No. No. 25-27 Vladimir Derevetsky, No. No. 28-30
*********************
Anatoly Erastov, No. No. 31,32
No. No. 33-35





***********************
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433011257.png
1.ed4 ( c:c1? 2.ab6 x)
1...c:a3 ! 2.dc5 d:b4 3 a:a1 cb6 4.dc3 ba5 5.cd4 ed6 6.e:c7 d:b6 7.de5 ab2! ( author wrote 8...fe7 ? )8.a:c3 fe7 9.f:d8 h:b2 =

Sapegin Alexander Ivanovitch ( Belarus ,Mogilev region ) ( 3+3,5=6, 5 points)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433057597.png
1.hg3 cb2 2.a:c3 cb6 3.a:e5 f:f2 4.de3 5.cb2 6.h:d8 7.de7 8.h:a3 hg3 9.ac5 gh2 10.cg1 x
Navrotsky Ivan Stanislavovitch, Minsk No. 54 (3+3=6 points)

bc5:, de5, h:e3 ba3, gh4, e:a7, hg5, cd4, a:f8 x
Andrey Maltchenko (Azov) , born in 1908 (4+4=8 points)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433222544.png Loiko Sergey Ivanovitch (Volyn region, Ivanichi village)
coincides : A. Saraev: 11th All-Russian contest , 1968-1969 (0 points)

Kamchitsky Dmitry Antonivitch (Mogilev ) (2+2=4 points)
Nikolay Vergeichik (Gomel) [3+3=6 points]
Perepelkin Sergey Anatolyevitch (Moscow) [ No. 98 -6, 5 points, No. 99 -6 points ]

Yacheykin Valery Dmitrievitch (Kyiv) [ 3+2, 5 = 5,5 points ]

hg7, cb2, gf4, h:b4, gf8 cb2,gf6, h:c1:h6 dc3, hc1 x
Nikolay Daki (Odessa region, Utkonosovka village)[3,5 + 3 = 6,5 points]
Sosunov Alexander Vasilievitch (Odessa) [3+3=6 points ]
Ny'ch Anatoly Grigorievitch [3, 5 +2, 5 = 6 points]
Ben Mikhail Yuryevitch (Kyiv) [3+3.5=6.5 points]
Pokhvalitov Sergey Aleksandrovitch (Simferopol) [No. 64: 2, 5 +3 = 5.5 points; No. 65 3+3 = 6 points]
Tsvetov Mikhail Ioganovitch[2, 5+ 3, 5 =6 points]
Ustyanov Stanislav Yuryevitch, Kharkov [2, 5+ 2,5 = 5 points] Chernyaev Yury Ivanovitch (Moscow)[3, 5 + 4 ]=7, 5 points
Yu. Chernyaev [4 + 4 , 5 ]=8, 5 points
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433133085.png
fe3, c5, :h6, e7, e7, hc1, c:g5 cb6, a:c7 d:a5, hd2, gf2,hf2 x The total score for two works is 16, first place .

12_th Moscow Championship -1985 in drafts composition, section « Problemi» at 64-cell board. Chief Judge A. Fedoruk changed the judge's score for "problema" No. 49, increasing it to 5 points. The chief judge did not inform the judge of the " problemi" section and the author of No. 49 about the change in score.The judge learned about this change in the score only 40 years after the Moscow Championship was held - in 2025.

**********************
Gorin Aleksander Petrovitch total drama with me on the(Moscow), No.No.1-5
..https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17449764735.png V.Belousov (Sverdlovsk region),No.No.6-11
V.Belousov + A. Fedoruk (12-th Moscow championship., 1985) , No. 11-A
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17449993954.png
"An unusually stupid presentation of the finale . It would have been better to present the theme in miniature",-A.Fedoruk :
1.fe5 dc3 2.cd2 3.gh4 4.fe7 5.g:a7 etc. x
Cherniaev Yury Ivanovitch (Moscow),No.No.12-16

"The game is interesting, but the initial arrangement of the checkers is bad. A result of the 18th All Soviet Union contest (score 6,5 points) has been saved.
, - A. Fedoruk.

Zhuchkov Sergey Sergeevich, Polushkino village, Ruzsky district, Moscow region (pensioner, profession janitor), No. No. 17-22
Pereverzev Andrey Viacheslavovitch (Taganrog)
Konstantinov Vitaly Sergeevitch (Belorechensk)

Afonin Anatoly Afanasyevitch, No. No. 35-40 Gusev Evgeny Pavlovich (born in 1938, Mytishchi, Moscow region), No. No. 41-46


[Shkludov Petr Aleksandrovitch ( Novopolotsk ) , No. No. 47-52
Ruchkin Boris Vasilievitch (Kirovsk, Murmansk region), No. No. 53-58
Zubov Evgraf Vladimirovitch (Moscow) , No. No. 59-60

Improvement
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17450505319.png

A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17451044866.png
д.№1 (1281) : 1.fg5 gh6 2.h:f4 de7 3. f:d8 h:d4 4.c:e5 a:a1 5.df6 ab2
6.fg5 h:d6 7.f:a1 de5 *)  8.a:f6 x
There was known before : forum "Planet" , Dec., of 27 , 2014 (reported by Alexander Hasminsky)
д. №2 : https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17452400097.png
P. Shkludov

д. №2 :1.hg5 f:h4 2.ed6 c:e7 3.f:f8 h:f6 4.d:g5 cb2
5.dc3 b:d2 6.e:e5 ba1 7.df6 ab2 8.fg5 h:d6 9.f:a1 x
A. Fomin , diagram created on July, of 19.2025 ( published for the purpose of protection against plagiarism)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17477696044.png

fg5, de5, dc3, bc7, g1 etc. x
A. Fomin , diagram created on July, of 19.2025 ( published for the purpose of protection against plagiarism)

1.ed2 2.f:d4 3.fe3 4.dc3 5.c:g1 etc. x
************
S. V. Vasiliev ,Moscow ( mag. by P.N..Bodiansky "Shaski" ,No.43 ,January,1901),correction : e3 >d2
Solution : fe7 ,fg5,hg7,hg3,g:a7 x
The following compositions were created later :
№537 :S.V. Vasiliev (1901), processing by A. Fomin, 2014

1.ef6 d:b2 2.fe7 f:d6 3.hg7 h:h4 4.fe5 d:f4 5.de3 f:d2 6.hg3 h:f2 7.g:a7 +
6.hg3 h:f2 7.g:a7 ab4 8.ab8 ba3 9.b:e5 +
The initial arrangement of the checkers is completely free of sloppy In this variation.
*****************************
The Arranged by P.Kovalev: Banner of Yunost(Youth) , Minsk, Dec., of 08.1970

1.fe 7 - The diagram has appeared an image of N. Irzhavsky's work from the IV All-Soviet Union Contest , 1968.
2.hg7 h:h4 3.ed2 c:g3 4.f:h2 d:d2:5.hg3 h:f2 6.g:a7 ab4 7.ab8 ba3 8.b:e5 x

A. Fomin ,Jul., of 26 , 14-37 (according to Moscow time)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17535298486.png
1.bc3 (fe1) 2.ed6 (e:g5) 3.h:d2 -Ya. Gordin :"The kurs of endings in drafts parties on a 64-cell board. ",с84 [209],1932 (ab2) A 4.dc3 (b:d4) 5.hg3(h:f2)6.g:c5 x A(hg3), 4.h:f4 (ab2) 5.dc3 (b:d4) 6.fe5 (d:f6) 7.gf2 x
№452 A Fomin, Jul., of 26 , 23-55(according to Moscow time)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17535633657.png 1.fg3 h:d4 2.fe5 d:f4 3.b:e3 d:f2 4.e:g3 h:f4 5.de3 f:d2 6.bc3 d:b4 7.a:a7 fe5 8.ab8 ed4 9.bf4 dc3 10.fc1 x

In 2014, a somewhat untidy-looking work from the “ problemy ” genre with an exact solution was published on the “Myth” forum.
A. Fomin, No. 405
http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/15074271103.png

1.ab8 f4 2.ba7 3.de7 4.h:d2 5.a:h6 ce3 6.h6:c1 x

P.Shkludov, 12-th Moscow championship on drafts composition, 1985

The chief judge of the Moscow championship A. Fedoruk gave the following description: "The solution to the main variant is smooth, but lacking in ideas. Variants A and B are positional garbage. A weak miniature."

................A. Fomin....................
...
D. No. 1 Brazilian checkers 1.f6 (g7) A 2.h:f6 3.h:f6 x A (g5), 2.h:c3 ! I 3.h:a1 x I 1.h6:g1? bc5! =
D. No. 2: Russian checkers :1.1.f6 (g7) A 2.h:f6 3.h:f6 x A (g5), 2.h:c3 3.h:a1 x
*********************************
Mif : July, of 18 , 2025
Theme :"Evening bell from D. K. "
..A. Fomin..

cd4 (c3), g7(a1), h8(f6), h2 (cd6), c7 (b6), c7(d6), f2 etc. x