World Draughts Forum

The initial construction of N. Zaitsev's problem looks like this:

P.Shkludov (2-d USSR trade union championship -1989 )
Yunis Idris-Ogly Abdullaev, No.1-3 , 1989.
Akulich Alexey Borisovitch,No.No.4-6 Andreev Gennady Mihailovitch , No.No.7-9
Balaniuk Anatoly Grigorievitch , No. No. 10-22

Belousov V. V , No. No. 13-16

Ben Mihail Yuri evitch : No. No. 16-18
Vergeitchik Nikolai Grigorievitch, No. No. 19-21 No.20
Vladimir Volkov(Novokuznetsk) , No. No. 22-24
***********************
Nickolay Daki, No. No. 25-27 Vladimir Derevetsky, No. No. 28-30
*********************
Anatoly Erastov, No. No. 31,32
No. No. 33-35





***********************
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433011257.png
1.ed4 ( c:c1? 2.ab6 x)
1...c:a3 ! 2.dc5 d:b4 3 a:a1 cb6 4.dc3 ba5 5.cd4 ed6 6.e:c7 d:b6 7.de5 ab2! ( author wrote 8...fe7 ? )8.a:c3 fe7 9.f:d8 h:b2 =

Sapegin Alexander Ivanovitch ( Belarus ,Mogilev region ) ( 3+3,5=6, 5 points)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433057597.png
1.hg3 cb2 2.a:c3 cb6 3.a:e5 f:f2 4.de3 5.cb2 6.h:d8 7.de7 8.h:a3 hg3 9.ac5 gh2 10.cg1 x
Navrotsky Ivan Stanislavovitch, Minsk No. 54 (3+3=6 points)

bc5:, de5, h:e3 ba3, gh4, e:a7, hg5, cd4, a:f8 x
Andrey Maltchenko (Azov) , born in 1908 (4+4=8 points)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433222544.png Loiko Sergey Ivanovitch (Volyn region, Ivanichi village)
coincides : A. Saraev: 11th All-Russian contest , 1968-1969 (0 points)

Kamchitsky Dmitry Antonivitch (Mogilev ) (2+2=4 points)
Nikolay Vergeichik (Gomel) [3+3=6 points]
Perepelkin Sergey Anatolyevitch (Moscow) [ No. 98 -6, 5 points, No. 99 -6 points ]

Yacheykin Valery Dmitrievitch (Kyiv) [ 3+2, 5 = 5,5 points ]

hg7, cb2, gf4, h:b4, gf8 cb2,gf6, h:c1:h6 dc3, hc1 x
Nikolay Daki (Odessa region, Utkonosovka village)[3,5 + 3 = 6,5 points]
Sosunov Alexander Vasilievitch (Odessa) [3+3=6 points ]
Ny'ch Anatoly Grigorievitch [3, 5 +2, 5 = 6 points]
Ben Mikhail Yuryevitch (Kyiv) [3+3.5=6.5 points]
Pokhvalitov Sergey Aleksandrovitch (Simferopol) [No. 64: 2, 5 +3 = 5.5 points; No. 65 3+3 = 6 points]
Tsvetov Mikhail Ioganovitch[2, 5+ 3, 5 =6 points]
Ustyanov Stanislav Yuryevitch, Kharkov [2, 5+ 2,5 = 5 points] Chernyaev Yury Ivanovitch (Moscow)[3, 5 + 4 ]=7, 5 points
Yu. Chernyaev [4 + 4 , 5 ]=8, 5 points
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17433133085.png
fe3, c5, :h6, e7, e7, hc1, c:g5 cb6, a:c7 d:a5, hd2, gf2,hf2 x The total score for two works is 16, first place .

12_th Moscow Championship -1985 in drafts composition, section « Problemi» at 64-cell board.:
Chief Judge A. Fedoruk, judge A. Fomin Chief Judge A. Fedoruk changed the judge's score for "problema" No. 49, increasing it to 5 points. The chief judge did not inform the judge of the " problemi" section and the author of No. 49 about the change in score.The judge learned about this change in the score only 40 years after the Moscow Championship was held - in 2025.

**********************
Gorin Aleksander Petrovitch total drama with me on the(Moscow), No.No.1-5
..https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17449764735.png V.Belousov (Sverdlovsk region),No.No.6-11
V.Belousov + A. Fedoruk (12-th Moscow championship., 1985) , No. 11-A
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17449993954.png
"An unusually stupid presentation of the finale . It would have been better to present the theme in miniature",-A.Fedoruk :
1.fe5 dc3 2.cd2 3.gh4 4.fe7 5.g:a7 etc. x
Cherniaev Yury Ivanovitch (Moscow),No.No.12-16

"The game is interesting, but the initial arrangement of the checkers is bad. A result of the 18th All Soviet Union contest (score 6,5 points) has been saved.
, - A. Fedoruk.

Zhuchkov Sergey Sergeevich, Polushkino village, Ruzsky district, Moscow region (pensioner, profession janitor), No. No. 17-22
Pereverzev Andrey Viacheslavovitch (Taganrog)
Konstantinov Vitaly Sergeevitch (Belorechensk)

Afonin Anatoly Afanasyevitch, No. No. 35-40 Gusev Evgeny Pavlovich (born in 1938, Mytishchi, Moscow region), No. No. 41-46


[Shkludov Petr Aleksandrovitch ( Novopolotsk ) , No. No. 47-52
Ruchkin Boris Vasilievitch (Kirovsk, Murmansk region), No. No. 53-58
Zubov Evgraf Vladimirovitch (Moscow) , No. No. 59-60

Improvement
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17450505319.png

A. Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17451044866.png
д.№1 (1281) : 1.fg5 gh6 2.h:f4 de7 3. f:d8 h:d4 4.c:e5 a:a1 5.df6 ab2
6.fg5 h:d6 7.f:a1 de5 *)  8.a:f6 x
There was known before : forum "Planet" , Dec., of 27 , 2014 (reported by Alexander Hasminsky)
д. №2 : https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17452400097.png
P. Shkludov

д. №2 :1.hg5 f:h4 2.ed6 c:e7 3.f:f8 h:f6 4.d:g5 cb2
5.dc3 b:d2 6.e:e5 ba1 7.df6 ab2 8.fg5 h:d6 9.f:a1 x
A. Fomin , diagram created on July, of 19.2025 ( published for the purpose of protection against plagiarism)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17477696044.png

fg5, de5, dc3, bc7, g1 etc. x
A. Fomin , diagram created on July, of 19.2025 ( published for the purpose of protection against plagiarism)

1.ed2 2.f:d4 3.fe3 4.dc3 5.c:g1 etc. x
************
S. V. Vasiliev ,Moscow ( mag. by P.N..Bodiansky "Shaski" ,No.43 ,January,1901),correction : e3 >d2
Solution : fe7 ,fg5,hg7,hg3,g:a7 x
The following compositions were created later :
№537 :S.V. Vasiliev (1901), processing by A. Fomin, 2014

1.ef6 d:b2 2.fe7 f:d6 3.hg7 h:h4 4.fe5 d:f4 5.de3 f:d2 6.hg3 h:f2 7.g:a7 +
6.hg3 h:f2 7.g:a7 ab4 8.ab8 ba3 9.b:e5 +
The initial arrangement of the checkers is completely free of sloppy In this variation.
*****************************
The Arranged by P.Kovalev: Banner of Yunost(Youth) , Minsk, Dec., of 08.1970

1.fe 7 - The diagram has appeared an image of N. Irzhavsky's work from the IV All-Soviet Union Contest , 1968.
2.hg7 h:h4 3.ed2 c:g3 4.f:h2 d:d2:5.hg3 h:f2 6.g:a7 ab4 7.ab8 ba3 8.b:e5 x

A. Fomin ,Jul., of 26 , 14-37 (according to Moscow time)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17535298486.png
1.bc3 (fe1) 2.ed6 (e:g5) 3.h:d2 -Ya. Gordin :"The kurs of endings in drafts parties on a 64-cell board. ",с84 [209],1932 (ab2) A 4.dc3 (b:d4) 5.hg3(h:f2)6.g:c5 x A(hg3), 4.h:f4 (ab2) 5.dc3 (b:d4) 6.fe5 (d:f6) 7.gf2 x
№452 A Fomin, Jul., of 26 , 23-55(according to Moscow time)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17535633657.png 1.fg3 h:d4 2.fe5 d:f4 3.b:e3 d:f2 4.e:g3 h:f4 5.de3 f:d2 6.bc3 d:b4 7.a:a7 fe5 8.ab8 ed4 9.bf4 dc3 10.fc1 x

In 2014, a somewhat untidy-looking work from the “ problemy ” genre with an exact solution was published on the “Myth” forum.
A. Fomin, No. 405
http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/15074271103.png

1.ab8 f4 2.ba7 3.de7 4.h:d2 5.a:h6 ce3 6.h6:c1 x

P.Shkludov, 12-th Moscow championship on drafts composition, 1985

The chief judge of the Moscow championship A. Fedoruk gave the following description: "The solution to the main variant is smooth, but lacking in ideas. Variants A and B are positional garbage. A weak miniature."

................A. Fomin....................
...
D. No. 1 Brazilian checkers 1.f6 (g7) A 2.h:f6 3.h:f6 x A (g5), 2.h:c3 ! I 3.h:a1 x I 1.h6:g1? bc5! =
D. No. 2: Russian checkers :1.1.f6 (g7) A 2.h:f6 3.h:f6 x A (g5), 2.h:c3 3.h:a1 x
*********************************
Mif : July, of 18 , 2025
Theme :"Evening bell from D. K. "
..A. Fomin..

cd4 (c3), g7(a1), h8(f6), h2 (cd6), c7 (b6), c7(d6), f2 etc. x

Chief Judge A. Fedoruk, judge V. Gorodetsky, consultant L. Vitoshkin.
Results of the 9th Moscow Championship, 1982 in the section "Etudes-64"

First place - V. N. Demidov -11,5 points
Second place - A. V. Fomin -11 points
Third place - E. M. Elizarov - 7 points

Yu. Gavriuchenkov, No. 1 (score=0 points )
Yu. Gavriuchenkov, No. 2(score=5 points )
E.Zubov , No. 2-a(score=0 points)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568458087.png
Oleg Rogozhin (Moscow), No. No. (3-5), score=0 points)
No. 3: https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568432211.png
No. 4: https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568433066.png
copy of the etude by A. Katyukha: "Draughts"--12-1976
No. 5: https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568434002.png
Repeats famous etude by V. Novikov, created in the 1930s(comment by A. Fedoruk)
A.Nagumanov , No.6 , score=3,5 points
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568439511.png
1.ba5 x A Fomin, No. No. 7,8( No. 7 score=4,5 points ;No.8 score=4 points)
Elizarov Evgeny Mikhailovich, No.9, "Shashki" - magazine -8-1982 (score 5 points)

V.Demidov , No. 13 , 0 points
Marriage: Less successful option #15 due to the rough
ntroduction move( superstructure).

V.Demidov , No. 14 , 4 points
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568415932.png
V.Demidov , No. 15 , 7,5 points
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568416801.png
V.Demidov , No. 16 , (0 points) :
This etude is marriage : In this position you can be won in another way 6. fg7 g:d4 7.ad6 x Serebrov Evdokim Ivanovich, Moscow, Krasnogvardeisky proezd.
No. 17 (score=3, 5 points)
No. 18 (score=0 points) A. Fedoruk wrote:"particular second solution : 2.g3 3.a1 x".
A.Fomin , No. No. 19-20

S. Kovalev (No.21) , 6,5 points
S. Kovalev (No.22) , 5,5 points
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17568408098.png
P Shkludov :No.No.23-26
Kupka Gennady Victorovitch , N.o. No. 27,28 (score =0 points)
A. Fedoruk wrote : No. 27 is .Marriage .. The endgame demonstrated by the author is the standard ending of the game
No. 28 is defective etude.
"The combination of techniques in variants "B" and "C" are well known, the other variants are not etude".
No. 29 is a copy of Maller's etude from the hundred- cell board from Dambrete's magazine 4-1982
No. 30 is marriage. Side solution in etude 1.ed6 was indicated by V. Demidov.
No.31 A. Terekhov, score=4 points

Comments of the chief judge of the championship A. Fedoruk.
Results of the 9th Moscow Championship on draughts composition in the section "Etudes-100" (by A. Fedoruk). Results by Judge L. Vitoshkin Yu.Cherniaev wrote a protest towards the scores of the judge Leonid Vitoshkin Yu. Cherniaev, No. No. 1-5

Yu.Cherniaev , No. 1,score=0 points No.2 Yu. Cherniaev , score=3 points Yu.Cherniaev , No. 3 Yu.Cherniaev , No. 4,score=4 points ]Yu.Cherniaev , No. 5 score=0 points A.Fedoruk wrote:

*****************************************************************
A.Fedoruk wrote:

A.Fomin ,No.6 , score=4 points
A. Fedoruk wrote : J. Viergevier's etude is a weak ideological predecessor, since it has only three standard variants 25(13) A, 9(10) B, 20(37) B, 9,14,24 B (26), 24(10), 8x B (14), 29/38, 29-34x
J. Viergevier (Netherlands) :"Dam eldorado ", No. 1 -1972 .
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17572202731.png

https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17571860447.png *****************************************************************

E.M.Elizarov , No.7 , score=0 points
E.M.Elizarov , No.8 , score=5 points E.M.Elizarov , No.9, score=1,5 points
V. N. Demidov, No. No. 11-14 , total points 13, 2nd place
E. V. Zubov, No. No. 15-18 E. V. Zubov, No. 16 E. V. Zubov, No. 17 E. V. Zubov, No. 18 E. V. Zubov, No. 19 S.Kovalev ,No.No.20-22 V. A. Frantsuzov, No. No. 23-24 V. A. Frantsuzov, No. No. 24
This is a copy of the Yu. Cherniaev etude from "Dambrete"-mag. , No. 8 , 1977
Supplement to etude No. 17 by E. Zubov : improvement by V. Demidov :

B.Shkitkin ,10-th Moscow championship on draughts composition,1983 (0 points) S. Pupkin - B. Shkitkin

The correspondence draughts game S. Pupkin - B. Shkitkin (10th Moscow Championship, 1983:) was continued as follows:
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17626450291.png
1.11-7 2.47:38 3.38-32:4.44-39 5.40:49;6.35:44 7.7-1'8.44-39 9.49:29;9.1:12 and Whites won.

B. Shkitkin came up with a more interesting variation of the game: 1.43-39 22:42 2.47: 38 28:46 3.39:28 23:43 4.34:3 25-45 5.35-30 14:34:6.3:49 6-17 7.44-39 34-43:8.49:5 x B. Shkitkin writes: five-fold "majority", a combination of two endings – kings opposition plus blocking of simple checker.

7-th USSR championship in draughts composition., 1989-1990, section "etudies-64"
Shulga V. I. No.No. No. 1-6
No.1 V. Shulga V Shulga, No. 2 V.Shulga , No.3 V.Shulga , No.4 V.Shulga , No.5 V.Shulga , No.6 Elizarov E. M. (Moscow region).No.No.7-12

No.7 E. Eluzarov No.8 E. Eluzarov No.9 E. Eluzarov No.10 E. Eluzarov No.11 E. Eluzarov No.12 E. Eluzarov Ustyanov S. Yu. (Kharkov), No.No.13-18
Ustyanov S. Yu. (Kharkov), No..13 Ustyanov S. Yu. (Kharkov), No.14 Ustyanov S.Yu. (Kharkov), No.15 Ustyanov S.Yu. (Kharkov), No.16
******************************************************************
Maziatis Algimantas Alfonsovičius, No.25-30
Maziatis Algimantas, No. 25 Maziatis Algimantas , No 26 Maziatis Algimantas , No 27 Maziatis Algimantas , No 28 Maziatis Algimantas , No 29 Maziatis Algimantas , No 30 *******************************
Vitoshkin L. S. , No. No. 31-46
No.31 L. Vitoshkin
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17638755462.png
A. Chernyshevitch writes: simple side solution : 1.be5 2.b6-g1 x No.32 L. Vitoshkin
https://www.fmjd.org/dias2/save/17638773525.png
A. Cherntshevitch writes :
" No. 32 has no solution after 1.h4 (dc1) = , for example 2.e5 (cd2) or 2.hf6 (de7) = No.33 L. Vitoshkin No.34 L. Vitoshkin No.35 L. Vitoshkin No.36 L. Vitoshkin Demidov V. N., No. No. 37-42
No.37 V. Demidov No.38 V. Demidov No.39 V. Demidov No.40 V. Demidov No.41 V. Demidov No.42 V. Demidov

As was discovered, theater and film actor S. Khottabychev every minute monitors the internet from 9 a.m. Minsk time until 2 a.m. the next day. Fearing criticism in his address for plagiarism, he immediately blocks critical posts addressed to him with his Russian-language nonsense.

The psychic vampire continues to steal other people's works, while taking on the role of a magistrate and dictator, which he openly admits on the forum , having no any embarrassment.
In an effort to capture the minds of readers, the self-proclaimed dictator writes on the forum in huge letters, preferring the color red to make his point more convincing.

The self-proclaimed tsar False Dmitry II also continues to broadcast Russian to European users of the draughts forum, violating information security principles. Specifically, he writes in Russian in a forum thread intended for reading in English and French. Furthermore, the impostor constantly floods the forum with his delusional texts in Russian, barely noticing the post of another forum user who doesn't speak Russian. Doesn't it time to announce a lifetime ban for the dictator and impostor?
***************
Here is the original of one of the author's positions stolen by the impostor.
No. 17 A. Fomin January 17, 2024 https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1662-topic#78206
Checkers and Composition
Post by Fomin January 17, 2024 at 12:26 am
bb3/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=8358&start=45#p134227
Re: Compositions at a 64-cell board by Andrew Fomin
Post by FOMIN » Thu May 16, 2024 03:06
1.cb2 ! cd4 2.e:e7 cd6 3.e:c5 b:d4 4 . f:d6 h:h2 5.c:e5 hg1
6.de3 gh2 7.ef6! h:c7 8.ef4 e:e1 9.bc3 e:b4 10.a:c5 ab6
11.c:a7 ab4 12.ab8 bD8-C7.bf4 cb2 14.fc1 ba1 15. ch6 a:g7 16.h:f8 x
Position from the debut " City game '
1. c3-d4 f6-g5 2. b2-c3 g5-h4 3. c3-b4 d6-c5 4. b4xd6 e7xc5 5. g3-f4 f8-e7 6.
a1-b2 e7-d6 7. f2-g3 h4xf2 8. e1xg3 b6-a5 9. d4xb6 a7xc5 10. b2-c3 g7-f6 11.
g3-h4 f6-e5 ? - (11...d8-e7 would have led to a draw!)
12. h2-g3 b8-a7 13. g1-f2 c7-b6 14. h4-g5 d8-c7

FOMIN wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 23:33

Down with the psycho vampire , plagiarist, an informer of the village district police department and hacker P Shkludov from the international draughts forum!
P. Shkludov privatized many archives of dedecease draughrs composers almost for free. He hides these archives in his barn in his village , in the strictest secrecy. His main interest is alteration other people's compositions (for example, moving a checker to another cell on the board. .) and publishing them under his own name.

A persistent village collective farmer and provocateur continues to besiege the international, draughts forum with his Russian-language messages, which are of no interest to anyone. Isn't it time for the administrator to permanently ban this restless psychic vampire?

viewtopic.php?p=137234#p1334
13-th Moscow championship on draughts composition,1986 .
The comments of Chief Judge A. Fedoruk follow in red letters.