World Draughts Forum

P.A. Bredov wrote:

Currently, there are two points of view on judging.
The first is to judge carefully, without being malicious, focusing only on the facts, that is, objectively, and without inventing anything of your own, either from the author's name or from the Rules and Regulations!

The second is to judge maliciously, pickily, sharply lowering scores, focusing on some own views on the composition, and without really paying attention to the Rules.

I suggest that the following respected comrades can be included in the first group of judges:

P. Shkludov (when, under a false name, he judges competitions of various scales – from Novopolotsk, the Belarusian Championship to the World Championship, with or without his own participation, and when, for example, he sees something that doesn't exist, such as "numerous false traces ");

R. Mackevičius (when he gives scores of 25 and 85 points for works of approximately the same characteristics, quality, and content);

A. Lyakhovsky (when he can't count to 50 and therefore settles on a score of 35 , or when, with the help and support of the organizer/coordinator/CPI member, he can't read and interpret in Russian the meaning of the basic rule regarding the compusitional variant in ganre of etudes);

I. Ivatsko (when for Nikitchuk has a completely different rule applies regarding ideoligical predecessor than for the other competitors);

A. Katyukha (when he's too lazy to judge the World Championships because the next Belarus championship is already being prepared and suddenly doesn't have time to look at the significant comments; when he's too lazy to look at all the variations of the etudes he agreed to judge, ...);
...

etc. and so on.

By the way, I could easily have added A. Moiseyev, R. Shayakhmetov, G. Andreyev, N. Grushevsky, A. Nagumanov to this list of "careful comrades" who sometimes overdo it, but I didn't want to write characterizations.

So, I've only mentioned a few careful, kind, honest, objective, capable judges, but I expect Mr. P.A. Bredov to list and specifically identify those who are evil, picky, unregulatory, and similarly unruly. We are particularly interested in violations of current laws, dishonest practices such as collusion or judging under false names, etc.


LeoMinor , Admin

Number of posts: 9091
Location: Croatia
Registration date: 2008-03-28
************************************
I've already pointed out that we can only get to the truth through Mr. Matus's "intimus," with whom he corresponded, and who knows even better than Matus that, in addition to $10,000, Matus gave his "coach" a computer containing undeleted files of Matus compositions..

Matus's "intimus" is the only one knows who coordinated the actions of judges A. Nagumanov and "N. Grushevsky," the only one who knows who corresponded with J. Bus on behalf of N. Grushevsky and why, and the only one who knows who stole N. Grushevsky's email password, who used that email, and for what purposes.

So, we have a person who can answer practically all our important questions.

And he is so truthful that he will answer if anyone asks.

Incidentally, he, like Matus, had high ideals and was willing to sacrifice himself for the sake of composition: to become a champion (becoming a champion wasn't an end in itself, but rather a desire to attract money to the composition industry).

What wonderful people live in our kingdom! I'm proud of them! They even donate money to the development of artistic alcoholism.

Re: Inter...

Author: LeoMinor, Mon, Dec 23, 2013, 2:10 PM

P.A. Bredov wrote:

But there were dishonest people who created the illusion of the existence of the MAFIA...

But how can we not agree on that?! — "Yes, in this case, Peter is right." — I completely agree!
A
There were and are such "dishonest people" who judged under fictitious names ("A.A. Shabalin"), invented things for authors that never happened ("numerous false traces " and the like), "assisted" where it was inadmissible (PWCP/PWCE for "Draughts-100," and it's better not to mention "Draughts-64")...

There's no point in listing all the achievements of such "dishonest people," since most of them are already known or will be known.

Incidentally, it's because of people like these that I left the Kingdom of Draughts.

Finally, I want to respond to my comrades' latest taunt: I've always been struck by qualities like "polalism," "diplomatism," and "chameleonism/opportunism," but I've never respected them, and for me such qualities of people were always disgusting.

V.Pishta :the book "Odessa school of composition in checkers , 2012 , No. 560 , p. 107

ab8 (an2), gh2, ef2, bd6, hg3, de7, h:g5, a;g7 x
There was known before:
V.Mulyar :'Komsomol banner :, Kiev, May, of 19, 1970

gh2 ef2, cd9, hg3, de7, g5, g7 x
V.Mulyar :'Komsomol banner :, Kiev, July, of 22 ,1969

***************************

FOMIN wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2025 09:06

The combination mechanism of this position completely coincides with the <problema> of N. Irzhavsky from the 4-th All-Russian Contest , 1968; two plagiarisms heads fell down on one head of real author. Moreover, the author of this idea of ​​a strike from the g1- cell is S. V. Vasiliev : "Shashki " by P. N. Bodyansky, 1901

********************
********************
V.Pishta :the book "Odessa school of composition in checkers " , 2012 , No. 588, p. 109

ef4, hg5:, b2, e5, g5 (f6), f4 etc. x
The ef4, hg5:, b2, e5, g5 (f6), f4, etc. x
The combination mechanism of this position completely coincides with the <problema> of A. Lentochkin: magazine "Checkers", Riga, No. 1 - 1971
In the original, the white checker standing on square "c1" (in the plagiarized position) is located on square "a1"

FOMIN wrote: Sat Dec 13, 2025 21:07

A clear deterioration in the external form and finale in comparison with the ideological predecessor, which published in the newspaper "Youth of Ukraine"(Молодь Украины) on September 22, 1970, uder author A. Saraev (Leningrad)

hg3! (h2), ed4, ef2, fg3, dc3, c:e7, h:a7 (hg7), ad4(gh6), dc3 (hg5), cd2 (gh4), de1 (ab4), e;a5 (hg3), ab6 (gh2), bg1 x
Another variant of plagiarism : N.Daki , The book "Odessa school of draughts composition ", 2012 , No. 840

bc5, de5, ef4 etc. x

FOMIN wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 07:10

Almost 5 years ago, on February 26, 2021, the author of this post posted an original approach to an old etude motif (see position in diagram No. 2) on the WDF forum. Without thinking twice, the plagiarist Shkludov changed the first move in the introduction to the author's " problema " and brazenly attributed the resulting variation to himself. The deceased now, unfortunately, Russian champion on composituons in " etudies -64 " Alligrant Aleksandrovich Lukyarov, assisted the author in choosing a preventive measure against the thief, P. Shkludov. He posted on the Myth forum, on behalf of A. Fomin, the position in diagram No. 1, illegally attributed by the plagiarist in favour for himself . Despite this, even 5 years later, the thief continues to try to convince viewers of his alleged copyright in someone else's work. Isn't it time to impeach the swindler , who sent a letter by the "Tsar of composition S. Khottabychev " letter to the FMJD lidership. to recommend in 2015 make a lifetime disqualification towards President of Russian draughts federation Anatoly Nikitin?
№664 A.Fomin
..
bb3/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=3840&start=375#p130784
Re: Praktische taktik Сообщение автор AFM в Вс Ноя 20, 2016 7:13 am
Post by FOMIN » Fri Feb 26, 2021 17:41
D. №1 : 1.ef4 eg3 2.gf6 etc.
D.№2 1.de5 fd4 2.gf6 eg5 3.hf6 gh2 4.fg3 hf4 5.de3 fd2
6.e:e5 cd4 A, B 7.e:c3 bc5 8.fg7 cb4 9.gh8 b:d2 10.hc3 db4 12.ac3x
A 6...cb4 7.a:c3 bc5 8.fg7 cd4 9.gh8 db2 10.fe7 df6 11.h:a1 x
B 6...cd6 7.ec7 bd8 8.ab6 ca7 9.fg7x
https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1573-topic
"Mif " , theme :Лукьянов, 13.01.2021
**********************
Re: Checkers Vampires

FOMIN wrote: Thu Dec 04, 2025 02:52

FOMIN wrote: Fri Dec 19, 2025 07:10

FOMIN wrote: Sun Oct 19, 2025 08:13

Shkludov wrote: Sun Dec 28, 2025 19:38

02.25.2021 wrote:P. Shkludov, 2021


http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16142366465.png

ab8, e7, a1 - 1983 - (c5 A), d6(f4), c7(e3 B), I b8(f2 C), g3, e5(g7), h8, d4(h2), g1+
A(a5), c3(h4 D), a1, e5(g7), h8, d4(h2), g1+ D(f4), a1+
B(g3), b8(h2), a7(g1), a1-d4+ C(d2), c3, e5+
I d8(g7 IA), h8(f2)= IA(f2), g7, e1+

I. Navrotsky:

In my opinion, A. Guralnik had it like this: Whites plain : A7, B6, C3, C5, D2, D4, E1, E3, F2, G1, H4; Black: plain A3, B8, D8, E5, E7, F4, F6, G3, G5, G7, H6.

http://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16142370712.png

h2(b2), a1, b4, c3, a5, c7, e5, d8(e3), c7, b8(c5), a7(d4), b2(f6), g3(e5), b6(g5), f4, c3, a1+

Regarding the combination in Guralnik's problem, there was this:

Aug 08, 2008 wrote:...
C
...
C
Yu. Pavlov Arranged by P. Shkludov, 1978

cd4, d4, de3, c3, d4, d2, c7, g7, d8 – Guerra +
And then Yu. Pavlov sent me a postcard (!!!). He wrote that it was his ending. That he also had the checkers g1 (white) and h2 (black). I agreed with his authorship. But there was a splinter inside, because this was my first coincidence.
[The toad (plagiarist , psychic vampire and forger -comment by A. F.))has croaked in the swamp: I am a mountain, I am higher than the mountains! But a stork flying by pecked the boastful toad and carried it off to feed its youngs(comment by Alexander Kogot'ko(Pinsk) ].
History shows that Yu. Pavlov (with the checkers g1 and h2) is just an ending, while Yu. Pavlov arranged by P. Shkludov (without these checkers) [ P. Shkludov sticks like a tick, in various ways, and it is already impossible to get rid of him, - Milenko Lepšić ]is a PROBLEM. It seems that the worship of "nature" and Vinderman's fears (regarding the open g1-square) played a cruel joke on the author here, too. He certainly saw the possibility of doing without the g1 and h2 checkers, but was afraid to do so…

February 27, 2021:

Addition:
With the g1/h2 checkers, the author is Leonid Efimov, "Komsomolskoye Znamya" (Kyiv), February 24, 1970.
An edit with the removal of these checkers was published in "Selskaya Gazeta" on March 10, 1978, but even earlier - V. Bulat, "Vecherniy Minsk" on January 31, 1975.