Oops are you really satisfied by a long serie of draws? Why not try and increase the number of wins instead of limiting the number of losses?BertTuyt wrote:Gerard,
any news regarding (thematic) Damy matches against KingsRow.
I play nowadays mini -matches (first 30 ballots) and i aim to play ( at least) 30 draws.
Last match 1 lost game, but it gave a cluefor improvement, and thats the good news !!
Bert
My appoach is the following:
1) each time I see a Damy win I analyse if Damy anticipate correctly this win and I try to improve this early advantage detection
2) each time I see a Kingsrow win I try to add the corresponding winning strategy to Damy's program. As a consequence Damy will not only be able to avoid similar loss but it will be able to apply a new winning strategy.
I do not consider a draw as a good news. Let's imagine a 30 games match between Damage and Kingsrow and taking the point of view of Damage wich result do you prefer:
1) 10 wins, 20 losses
2) 30 draws
As far as I am concerned I prefer the first scenario because in this scenario I know Damage would have the potential to win a lot of games. The second scenario seems very poor for potential improvment isn't it?