Discussion about development of draughts in the time of computer and Internet.
-
BertTuyt
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 19:42
Post
by BertTuyt » Sat Dec 15, 2012 23:13
Herewith some Kingsrow - Flits Match results.
Code: Select all
Match W L D ELO
Kingsrow 1 Min - Flits 1 Min 29 7 122 49
Kingsrow 10 Min - Flits 1 Min 48 2 108 104
Kingsrow 1 Min - Flits 10 Min 7 19 132 -26
So Flits ELO increases with 49 + 26 = 75 , whereas the increase for Kingsrow is 104 - 49 = 55
For those interested the match games.
Bert
-
Attachments
-
- dxpgames-Dec-2012v9.pdn
- (141.25 KiB) Downloaded 268 times
-
- dxpgames-Dec-2012v8.pdn
- (147.71 KiB) Downloaded 295 times
-
- dxpgames-Dec-2012v7.pdn
- (146.84 KiB) Downloaded 257 times
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Post
by Krzysztof Grzelak » Fri Jan 17, 2014 17:44
Match KINGSROW - DRAGON
Kingsrow 1.54 vs. Dragon 4.3.1 (64 bit standaard) 12 wins, 12 losses, 133 draws, 1 unknowns
Kingsrow
Opening Book = Best Moves
HashTable Size = 512 MB
DB cache Size = 12000 MB, 6P
CPU 4 = 8 cores
Pondering = Off
Time = 1 Min / 100 Moves
Dragon
Opening Book = Tournament Book
HashTable Size = 512 MB
DB cache Size = 2000 MB, 6P
CPU 4 = 8 cores
Ponder= Off
Time = 1 Min / 100 Move
-
Attachments
-
- dxpgames.pdn
- (170.11 KiB) Downloaded 266 times
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Post
by Krzysztof Grzelak » Sat Jan 18, 2014 14:25
Match KINGSROW - DRAGON
Kingsrow 1.54 vs. Dragon 4.3.1 (64 bit standaard) 9 wins, 7 losses, 141 draws, 1 unknowns
Kingsrow
Opening Book = Best Moves
HashTable Size = 512 MB
DB cache Size = 12000 MB, 6P
CPU 4 = 8 cores
Pondering = Off
Time = 5 Min / 100 Moves
Dragon
Opening Book = Tournament Book
HashTable Size = 512 MB
DB cache Size = 2000 MB, 6P
CPU 4 = 8 cores
Ponder= Off
Time = 5 Min / 100 Move
-
Attachments
-
- dxpgames.pdn
- (164.66 KiB) Downloaded 289 times
-
BertTuyt
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 19:42
Post
by BertTuyt » Sat Jan 18, 2014 18:20
Thanks for this interesting match initiative , and thanks for sharing the results.
What was the hardware used for this match,did the 2 programs run on 1 machine?
Last but not least it would help me if you would include the match result in your post, so I don't need to browse through all games.
Bert
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Post
by Krzysztof Grzelak » Sat Jan 18, 2014 18:50
BertTuyt wrote:Thanks for this interesting match initiative , and thanks for sharing the results.
What was the hardware used for this match,did the 2 programs run on 1 machine?
Last but not least it would help me if you would include the match result in your post, so I don't need to browse through all games.
Bert
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium (Service Pack 1). Procesor i7 2670QM with memory of frames DDR3 1333 MHz 16 GB.
-
BertTuyt
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 19:42
Post
by BertTuyt » Sat Jan 18, 2014 19:28
Thanks for the information, "sounds"" like an expensive Notebook...
Bert
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Post
by Krzysztof Grzelak » Sat Jan 18, 2014 20:22
BertTuyt wrote:Thanks for the information, "sounds"" like an expensive Notebook...
Bert
Yes. Bought to games in tournaments in draughts. I would like yet to buy me disk hard Samsung 840 EVO SSD 1TB .But still he is expensive in Poland.
-
BertTuyt
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 19:42
Post
by BertTuyt » Tue Jan 21, 2014 00:23
Yes. Bought to games in tournaments in draughts. I would like yet to buy me disk hard Samsung 840 EVO SSD 1TB .But still he is expensive in Poland.
Good choice. This one is also on my "shopping list".
In Holland the price is around 549 euro.
It would be perfect for storing a 8p Database, with superfast access as a result.
I now use a smaller SSD for my 7p Database, and it is really helpful..
Bert
-
Walter
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 19:23
- Real name: Walter Thoen
Post
by Walter » Tue Jan 21, 2014 13:24
BertTuyt wrote:
Yes. Bought to games in tournaments in draughts. I would like yet to buy me disk hard Samsung 840 EVO SSD 1TB .But still he is expensive in Poland.
Good choice. This one is also on my "shopping list".
In Holland the price is around 549 euro.
It would be perfect for storing a 8p Database, with superfast access as a result.
I now use a smaller SSD for my 7p Database, and it is really helpful..
Bert
There is always a faster option just around the corner
My wish list for a 2015 draughts machine:
72-Cores Intel Knights Landing CPU
512GB RAM
1TB PCIe SSD memory card (like OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2)
Walter
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Post
by Krzysztof Grzelak » Sat Apr 05, 2014 23:09
Match KINGSROW - DRAGON (3-move ballots)
Kingsrow 1.54 vs. Dragon 4.4.0 (64 bit standaard) 7 losses ,6 wins, 144 draws, 1 unknowns
Kingsrow
Opening Book = Best Moves
HashTable Size = 512 MB
DB cache Size = 12000 MB, 6P
CPU 4 = 8 cores
Pondering = Off
Time = 5 Min / 100 Moves
Dragon
Opening Book = Tournament Book
HashTable Size = 512 MB
DB cache Size = 2000 MB, 6P
CPU 4 = 8 cores
Ponder= Off
Time = 5 Min / 100 Move
-
Attachments
-
- dxpgames.pdn
- (167.29 KiB) Downloaded 291 times
-
Catherine
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 22:24
- Real name: Catherine Bourneuf
Post
by Catherine » Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:57
Hi dear programmer, thiese results that there mean that Dragon is stronger than Kingsrow? IT SEEN THAt the calculation strenght and speed of Dragon is better than ever.
-
MichelG
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 20:24
-
Contact:
Post
by MichelG » Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:43
Catherine wrote:Hi dear programmer, thiese results that there mean that Dragon is stronger than Kingsrow? IT SEEN THAt the calculation strenght and speed of Dragon is better than ever.
Dragon and Kingsrow are much closer in strength than these results appear to show. I think dragon is winning the 1 minute match 25 to 3, because kingsrow is not configured optimally. It is probably the hash table; 512 MB hash is too much at this level on Krzysztof's hardware. I don't know what the best value is for kingsrow, but with 128 MB hash for each minute of gametime it should do better.
In dragon 4.4, it is no longer possible to assign too much space for hashtables since the hashtable size is automatically set to the optimal amount for the hardware it is running on.
Michel
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Post
by Krzysztof Grzelak » Wed Apr 09, 2014 13:28
MichelG wrote:Catherine wrote:Hi dear programmer, thiese results that there mean that Dragon is stronger than Kingsrow? IT SEEN THAt the calculation strenght and speed of Dragon is better than ever.
Dragon and Kingsrow are much closer in strength than these results appear to show. I think dragon is winning the 1 minute match 25 to 3, because kingsrow is not configured optimally. It is probably the hash table; 512 MB hash is too much at this level on Krzysztof's hardware. I don't know what the best value is for kingsrow, but with 128 MB hash for each minute of gametime it should do better.
In dragon 4.4, it is no longer possible to assign too much space for hashtables since the hashtable size is automatically set to the optimal amount for the hardware it is running on.
Michel
Obviously that oneself made a mistake, for what warmly apologize Ed. What to short times this adjust for both programmes
256 mb. It thanks also Michel that turned on then attention.
-
Catherine
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 22:24
- Real name: Catherine Bourneuf
Post
by Catherine » Wed Apr 09, 2014 14:21
Thank Michel for the precision, Kingsrow is the best program to test another. And it is clear that beat it mean that Dragon has been improved since 2.4 version. Thank for all the job that you, ED, Bert and the others doing for us, fans of software. Thank again and God bless you all!!!