Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin

[FOMIN]

...... ............ .. A.Fomin.............. ... . .

1.2 2 44 3.43 4.16 5.7 6.45 6 7. 7 11 8. 16 9.11 45 10. 50 x

[FOMIN]

https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1408p675-topic#62754
Re: ИнТер...
Posted by Fomin Mon. ,Sept. of 10, 2018 6:58 am
.........,..... ... A.Fomin............................

15397912305.png (8.03 KiB) Viewed 11284 times

A.Fomin , "De problemist " ,No.6,dec.,2020[76]
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16507777123.png

16507777123.png (6.54 KiB) Viewed 11272 times

[FOMIN]

............. .A.Fomin...............
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16513386541.png

16513386541.png (6.01 KiB) Viewed 11260 times

[FOMIN]

Dedicated to the centenary of the birth of the International Arbiter on drafts ,Honored Coach of the USSR
A.I. Vinderman (8.06.1922-2001)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16551281277.png

16551281277.png (6.65 KiB) Viewed 11119 times

30 34 , 22 29:18 , 2 7 ,11, 1 32, 26 , 39 , 27x

https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16555156514.png

16555156514.png (5.69 KiB) Viewed 11119 times

I.p. is I.Mozer,1941, No.88, p.22
1.27 32 2.21 3.40 4.6 37 - I .Mozer , "Het eindspel ",1941 5.6-1 etc. x

[FOMIN]

...................................Yuri Golikov (Tver region)....................................

16568800816.png (72.43 KiB) Viewed 11035 times

[Symix]

Непонятно - в форуме предназначенным для русского языка господин Фомин пишет на английском!

[FOMIN]

............A.Fomin...............

1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

[FOMIN]

Снимок (9).JPG (61.93 KiB) Viewed 10908 times

..
The other variation looks like this. The proof of the legitimacy of the initial arrangement of checkers is simple:
0)09 4:13 1) 25-20 30:39 etc. x
3rd variant of the etude endgame:
1.4 2.:28 5 3.37 4 .46:47 x

.

16590625379.png (8.44 KiB) Viewed 10908 times

**************************************************
***************************************************

............A.Fomin...............

1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

Is this position correct? After 32-28 23x41 34x5 41-46 white wins easily using 17-12.

Dear Mr. Wesselink !
Thank you for your remark.
In solution of this miniature on the second move, Blacks should play (47), which follows from the further solution of it , indicated correctly.
Thus, the correct solution finally looks like this.
1.28 2.05 47 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

[Wieger Wesselink]

............A.Fomin...............

1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

Is this position correct? After 32-28 23x41 34x5 41-46 white wins easily using 17-12.

[FOMIN]

.......... A.Fomin ................

16688549546.png (6.85 KiB) Viewed 10485 times

..

16641134919.png (6.35 KiB) Viewed 10485 times

[FOMIN]

Ju. Golikov (Tver , Russia)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16728386233.png
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16728834634.png

16728834634.png (4.73 KiB) Viewed 10330 times

16728386233.png (4.43 KiB) Viewed 10330 times

[FOMIN]

https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16743067409.png
12 , 1 (45), 40 , 38 , 30 - R.K.Keller's position appears on the board (I.Mozer's book , 1941 , D.No.1080 , p.156 )

16743067409.png (7.32 KiB) Viewed 10199 times

**************************

1.27 2.7 - the fragment of I..Mozer position appears on the board(I.Mozer's book , 1941 , D.No.1081 , p.156 )
2... 38 3..02 (18) 4.07 (22) 5.16 (42) 6.27 (22:31) 7.48 x

16743611708.png (5.33 KiB) Viewed 10199 times

A.Fomin , 9-th Moscow championship on drafts composition , 1982 (No.No.5-8)

IMG_20230123_114813.jpg (1.41 MiB) Viewed 10199 times

******************************

IMG_20230123_155422.jpg (2.07 MiB) Viewed 10199 times

[FOMIN]

----------------------------------------------------------
A.Dropash(Moscow), No.1 (3,5 points)....No.2(5,5 points)
.............
A.Dropash No.3 ( 6,5 points ).................. D.No.4 (4,5 points)
............
D.No.1 :45,22(38), 15.30,33 x
D.No.2: 17,7, 41,1,34, 18,44, 20,43, (45), 6 x
D.No.3: 23,41(34), 39,8,3,3:45(40), 9,43 x (6,5 points)
D.No.4::22,7,41,34(49), 27(21), 7,2 etc . x with inaccurate endgame play .

L.Telkanov , No.33

IMG_20230309_081524.jpg (1.08 MiB) Viewed 9999 times

L.Telkanov , No.34

IMG_20230309_082736.jpg (2.38 MiB) Viewed 9998 times

L.Telkanov , No.35

IMG_20230309_083204.jpg (2.2 MiB) Viewed 9995 times

*********************************

A.Fomin , No.9

IMG_20230309_152340.jpg (2.05 MiB) Viewed 9991 times

A.Fomin , No.10

IMG_20230309_154213.jpg (1.8 MiB) Viewed 9988 times

_____________________________________
A.Fomin , No.12 (5,0 points)


"64"-No.20,1983

************************************
B.Shkitkin (Moscow)



************************************
E.Zubov (Moscow)




**************************

Yu.. Fainshtein ........................Yu.. Fainshtein
No.43 (4,5 points)....................No.45 (5,0 points)......
..
I 38,23,43,19,10,33 x
A. Fedoruk wrote: “It was better to arrange (make) this problem like this ”( w.p.41 >47 , w.p.42>38 : 1.47-41x)
II 27,31,3,20,35,44x
Yu.. Fainshtein No.42'(3,0 points)

1(38), 1:31:33,24,34(40), 34,34x
************************
A.Nagumanov :No.29 (4,5 points)..........A.Nagumanov No.30 (4,5 points)
.................
No.29: 43,44,41,21 etc.x
No.30:14,3,3:1116:30), 35:33x
A.Nagumanov :No.31(4,0 points)...........A.Nagumanov :No.32(5,0 points)
..................
21(48), 5,44,28,39,49:20,35:24x ...................... 19,3,49x...............,...
***********************
Yu.Markvarde , No.56 (4,5 points)...........Yu.Markvarde , No.57 (3,5 points)
....................
Yu.Markvarde , No.58 (3,0 points)............Yu.Markvarde , No.58 (3,0 points)....
....................
38(32), 39,42,37(18)A, 10,31 41,24,3x A (23(, 28x ......................... 23,1, (27), 39+45), 31,33 , 13 etc.x

[FOMIN]

Ju.Golikov (Tver, Russia)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16821473144.png
30-24, 18, 2, 47 (14-19),20(23),15(29),24, 19(47),24,24 x
.

16821473144.png (6.67 KiB) Viewed 9774 times

[FOMIN]

A. Fomin

13,12 etc. x