Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
...... ............ .. A.Fomin.............. ... . .
1.2 2 44 3.43 4.16 5.7 6.45 6 7. 7 11 8. 16 9.11 45 10. 50 x
1.2 2 44 3.43 4.16 5.7 6.45 6 7. 7 11 8. 16 9.11 45 10. 50 x
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1408p675-topic#62754
Re: ИнТер...
Posted by Fomin Mon. ,Sept. of 10, 2018 6:58 am
.........,..... ... A.Fomin............................
A.Fomin , "De problemist " ,No.6,dec.,2020[76]
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16507777123.png
Re: ИнТер...
Posted by Fomin Mon. ,Sept. of 10, 2018 6:58 am
.........,..... ... A.Fomin............................
A.Fomin , "De problemist " ,No.6,dec.,2020[76]
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16507777123.png
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
............. .A.Fomin...............
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16513386541.png
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16513386541.png
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
Dedicated to the centenary of the birth of the International Arbiter on drafts ,Honored Coach of the USSR
A.I. Vinderman (8.06.1922-2001)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16551281277.png 30 34 , 22 29:18 , 2 7 ,11, 1 32, 26 , 39 , 27x
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16555156514.png I.p. is I.Mozer,1941, No.88, p.22
1.27 32 2.21 3.40 4.6 37 - I .Mozer , "Het eindspel ",1941 5.6-1 etc. x
A.I. Vinderman (8.06.1922-2001)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16551281277.png 30 34 , 22 29:18 , 2 7 ,11, 1 32, 26 , 39 , 27x
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16555156514.png I.p. is I.Mozer,1941, No.88, p.22
1.27 32 2.21 3.40 4.6 37 - I .Mozer , "Het eindspel ",1941 5.6-1 etc. x
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
...................................Yuri Golikov (Tver region)....................................
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
Непонятно - в форуме предназначенным для русского языка господин Фомин пишет на английском!
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
............A.Fomin...............
1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x
1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x
Non-classical etudies
The other variation looks like this. The proof of the legitimacy of the initial arrangement of checkers is simple:
0)09 4:13 1) 25-20 30:39 etc. x
3rd variant of the etude endgame:
1.4 2.:28 5 3.37 4 .46:47 x
. **************************************************
***************************************************
Wieger Wesselink wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 11:10Is this position correct? After 32-28 23x41 34x5 41-46 white wins easily using 17-12.
Dear Mr. Wesselink !
Thank you for your remark.
In solution of this miniature on the second move, Blacks should play (47), which follows from the further solution of it , indicated correctly.
Thus, the correct solution finally looks like this.
1.28 2.05 47 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x
Last edited by FOMIN on Sat Jul 30, 2022 15:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 13:22
- Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
.......... A.Fomin ................
..
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16743067409.png
12 , 1 (45), 40 , 38 , 30 - R.K.Keller's position appears on the board (I.Mozer's book , 1941 , D.No.1080 , p.156 )
**************************
1.27 2.7 - the fragment of I..Mozer position appears on the board(I.Mozer's book , 1941 , D.No.1081 , p.156 )
2... 38 3..02 (18) 4.07 (22) 5.16 (42) 6.27 (22:31) 7.48 x A.Fomin , 9-th Moscow championship on drafts composition , 1982 (No.No.5-8) ******************************
Re: 10_th Moscow championship by drafts composition , 1983 ("problems-100")
----------------------------------------------------------
A.Dropash(Moscow), No.1 (3,5 points)....No.2(5,5 points)
.............
A.Dropash No.3 ( 6,5 points ).................. D.No.4 (4,5 points)
............
D.No.1 :45,22(38), 15.30,33 x
D.No.2: 17,7, 41,1,34, 18,44, 20,43, (45), 6 x
D.No.3: 23,41(34), 39,8,3,3:45(40), 9,43 x (6,5 points)
D.No.4::22,7,41,34(49), 27(21), 7,2 etc . x with inaccurate endgame play .
*********************************
_____________________________________
A.Fomin , No.12 (5,0 points)
"64"-No.20,1983
************************************
B.Shkitkin (Moscow)
************************************
E.Zubov (Moscow)
**************************
Yu.. Fainshtein ........................Yu.. Fainshtein
No.43 (4,5 points)....................No.45 (5,0 points)......
..
I 38,23,43,19,10,33 x
A. Fedoruk wrote: “It was better to arrange (make) this problem like this ”( w.p.41 >47 , w.p.42>38 : 1.47-41x)
II 27,31,3,20,35,44x
Yu.. Fainshtein No.42'(3,0 points)
1(38), 1:31:33,24,34(40), 34,34x
************************
A.Nagumanov :No.29 (4,5 points)..........A.Nagumanov No.30 (4,5 points)
.................
No.29: 43,44,41,21 etc.x
No.30:14,3,3:1116:30), 35:33x
A.Nagumanov :No.31(4,0 points)...........A.Nagumanov :No.32(5,0 points)
..................
21(48), 5,44,28,39,49:20,35:24x ...................... 19,3,49x...............,...
***********************
Yu.Markvarde , No.56 (4,5 points)...........Yu.Markvarde , No.57 (3,5 points)
....................
Yu.Markvarde , No.58 (3,0 points)............Yu.Markvarde , No.58 (3,0 points)....
....................
38(32), 39,42,37(18)A, 10,31 41,24,3x A (23(, 28x ......................... 23,1, (27), 39+45), 31,33 , 13 etc.x
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
Ju.Golikov (Tver, Russia)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16821473144.png
30-24, 18, 2, 47 (14-19),20(23),15(29),24, 19(47),24,24 x
.
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16821473144.png
30-24, 18, 2, 47 (14-19),20(23),15(29),24, 19(47),24,24 x
.
Re: Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin
A. Fomin
13,12 etc. x
13,12 etc. x