Partijproblematiek

[Arjen]

Ik stuitte op een aardige studiestand die ik toch maar laat zien.
Er is voor de witspeler één aangewezen zet, maar is het ook genoeg voor de winst?

I (Damy!) don't see any win here.

That's right. After 1.33-29 there are two important variants. 1...12-17 is a losing one, because of a nice Coupe Napoleon. But (unfortunately) black can defend with 1...20-25 2.40-35 12-17 3.29-24 16-21! 4.27x16 18-22 etc. =

[ildjarn]

Evgraf Zubov

[TAILLE]

A.T. / 15-08-2018 / 9x9

Ik heb gestoeid met diverse zettingen van dit idee en had daarbij nogal te kampen met wat gevalletjes van bijoplosbaarheid. In de diagramstand kan ik ook de zwarte schijven iets anders neerzetten (7 op 11 en 21 op 16) waarna ik gegarandeerd een kloppende forcing heb. Maar eigenlijk verkies ik liever deze zetting, want de auteursbedoeling is nu meer verborgen en verweven in positiespel van aanval versus omsingeling. Ik weet (nog) niet helemaal zeker of het geheel ook daadwerkelijk 'waterdicht' is... reacties zijn als altijd welkom!

Hi Arjen,


Isn't it possible to begin with the above diagram and the beautiful 41-36! move ?

[Arjen]

A.T. / 15-08-2018 / 9x9

Ik heb gestoeid met diverse zettingen van dit idee en had daarbij nogal te kampen met wat gevalletjes van bijoplosbaarheid. In de diagramstand kan ik ook de zwarte schijven iets anders neerzetten (7 op 11 en 21 op 16) waarna ik gegarandeerd een kloppende forcing heb. Maar eigenlijk verkies ik liever deze zetting, want de auteursbedoeling is nu meer verborgen en verweven in positiespel van aanval versus omsingeling. Ik weet (nog) niet helemaal zeker of het geheel ook daadwerkelijk 'waterdicht' is... reacties zijn als altijd welkom!

Hi Arjen,


Isn't it possible to begin with the above diagram and the beautiful 41-36! move ?

Yes, I think it's possible! I didn't see this extension, because it's not really obvious.
Is this setting also possible? I prefer it for aesthetic reasons...

[TAILLE]

A.T. / 15-08-2018 / 9x9

Ik heb gestoeid met diverse zettingen van dit idee en had daarbij nogal te kampen met wat gevalletjes van bijoplosbaarheid. In de diagramstand kan ik ook de zwarte schijven iets anders neerzetten (7 op 11 en 21 op 16) waarna ik gegarandeerd een kloppende forcing heb. Maar eigenlijk verkies ik liever deze zetting, want de auteursbedoeling is nu meer verborgen en verweven in positiespel van aanval versus omsingeling. Ik weet (nog) niet helemaal zeker of het geheel ook daadwerkelijk 'waterdicht' is... reacties zijn als altijd welkom!

Hi Arjen,


Isn't it possible to begin with the above diagram and the beautiful 41-36! move ?

Yes, I think it's possible! I didn't see this extension, because it's not really obvious.
Is this setting also possible? I prefer it for aesthetic reasons...

How do you win after 1.41-36 18-22 ?

With my previous proposal it would follow
1.41-36 18-22 2.28-23 22-27 3.23-19 etc.

[Arjen]

How do you win after 1.41-36 18-22 ?

I'm afraid I can't win...



What you think of this setting?
There are some nice fake solutions.

[TAILLE]

How do you win after 1.41-36 18-22 ?

I'm afraid I can't win...



What you think of this setting?
There are some nice fake solutions.

Something may be wrong because you changed who is to move? Can you verify the setting ?

[Arjen]

How do you win after 1.41-36 18-22 ?

I'm afraid I can't win...



What you think of this setting?
There are some nice fake solutions.

Something may be wrong because you changed who is to move? Can you verify the setting ?

Black piece on 5, not 10, sorry.

[TAILLE]

I'm afraid I can't win...



What you think of this setting?
There are some nice fake solutions.

Something may be wrong because you changed who is to move? Can you verify the setting ?

Black piece on 5, not 10, sorry.

Of course this position is correct but I confess I do not like it very much : for me the move 40-35 looks quite non interesting because even a weak player will play this move in a real game. I always prefer to be a little surprised by the first move of a problem.
May be you have another idea to add some other moves to reach this new position ?

[Arjen]

Something may be wrong because you changed who is to move? Can you verify the setting ?

Black piece on 5, not 10, sorry.

Of course this position is correct but I confess I do not like it very much : for me the move 40-35 looks quite non interesting because even a weak player will play this move in a real game. I always prefer to be a little surprised by the first move of a problem.
May be you have another idea to add some other moves to reach this new position ?

Thanks for your feedback, Gérard. At the moment, I don't have any other ideas... but I will study on it.


A.T. / 22-08-2018 / 8x8

What about this?

[TAILLE]

Black piece on 5, not 10, sorry.

Of course this position is correct but I confess I do not like it very much : for me the move 40-35 looks quite non interesting because even a weak player will play this move in a real game. I always prefer to be a little surprised by the first move of a problem.
May be you have another idea to add some other moves to reach this new position ?

Thanks for your feedback, Gérard. At the moment, I don't have any other ideas... but I will study on it.


A.T. / 22-08-2018 / 8x8

What about this?

Nice problem Joost. I like it.

[Edwin Twiest]

Of course this position is correct but I confess I do not like it very much : for me the move 40-35 looks quite non interesting because even a weak player will play this move in a real game. I always prefer to be a little surprised by the first move of a problem.
May be you have another idea to add some other moves to reach this new position ?

Thanks for your feedback, Gérard. At the moment, I don't have any other ideas... but I will study on it.


A.T. / 22-08-2018 / 8x8

What about this?

Nice problem Joost. I like it.

Joost?

[Arjen]

A.T. / DP Augustus / 11x11

[TAILLE]

Thanks for your feedback, Gérard. At the moment, I don't have any other ideas... but I will study on it.


A.T. / 22-08-2018 / 8x8

What about this?

Nice problem Joost. I like it.

Joost?

Oops, sorry Arjen, I was reading another subject while I answered you.

[Arjen]

A.T. / 29-08-2018 / 10x10