Killer draughts
Re: Killer draughts
The right steps how to win this end-game in "Light-killer"
1)
Occupy double-line
2)
transfer 1 king to 26
3)
then in proper moment move another king to 16. at this moment black king can be situated only on sides of the board, so can not come back to double-line. One triple or quadrant it is easy catched.
If it is true, then will get vety famous end-game from 64.
6.
winning moves: 1.3710! 2038 2.1014! (important field) 3833 (3829,3824) 3.1432! 3344 4. 3210! 4433 5.1621! 3344 (5...3315 6.104! and 7.2138x) 6.4742!
1)
Occupy double-line
2)
transfer 1 king to 26
3)
then in proper moment move another king to 16. at this moment black king can be situated only on sides of the board, so can not come back to double-line. One triple or quadrant it is easy catched.
If it is true, then will get vety famous end-game from 64.
6.
winning moves: 1.3710! 2038 2.1014! (important field) 3833 (3829,3824) 3.1432! 3344 4. 3210! 4433 5.1621! 3344 (5...3315 6.104! and 7.2138x) 6.4742!
http://ru.pokerstrategy.com/#uS7UG6
Lets play Poker, to get for free 50$
Lets play Poker, to get for free 50$
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Killer draughts
I was playing with this position, but couldn't find the win. One finesse that I missed was explained at the Shashki forum: 1... 2-16? 2. 26-37!!+ It takes a while to train your brain to see these tactics automaticallyJuri wrote:
Look like this construction is winning.
Ideas are very similar to 64.
If this really wins (and therefore also post-Scouppe with white piece on 15!) then that is very good news and it would make me more optimistic about the win percentage in Killer-light.
Re: Killer draughts
I checked this last position with my program, and it's an easy win. Except the variant already mentioned, I give these two:
(1) 2-7, 28-32, 7-11, 27-22, 11-28x-37x, 26-48x, 36-31, 48-26x
(2) 2-35, 28-19, 35-13x-31x, 26-42x, 36-31, 42-26x
However, for the variant that Rein already mentioned, the program suggests this variant:
(3) 2-16, 28-32, 16-7, 27-18, 7-23x-37x, 26-48x, 36-31, 48-26x
Mats
(1) 2-7, 28-32, 7-11, 27-22, 11-28x-37x, 26-48x, 36-31, 48-26x
(2) 2-35, 28-19, 35-13x-31x, 26-42x, 36-31, 42-26x
However, for the variant that Rein already mentioned, the program suggests this variant:
(3) 2-16, 28-32, 16-7, 27-18, 7-23x-37x, 26-48x, 36-31, 48-26x
Mats
Last edited by MLWi on Tue Feb 16, 2016 05:45, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 4245
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 22:11
Re: Killer draughts
Revolution in the draughts world
About Killer Draughts
http://www.ericsdamsite.com/damrubriek_ ... i_2016.htm
About Killer Draughts
http://www.ericsdamsite.com/damrubriek_ ... i_2016.htm
http://www.ericsdamsite.com
http://www.thailandopen.nl
http://dammen.startpagina.nl
http://www.thailandopen.nl
http://dammen.startpagina.nl
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Killer draughts
Could you please use normal notation? I don't understand: after 2-7 28-32 7-11 27-22 11x37 26x42 it's a draw, right? Black plays 36-41 (not 36-31)MLWi wrote:I checked this last position with my program, and it's an easy win. Except the variant already mentioned, I give these two:
(1) 2-7, 28-32, 7-11, 27-22, 11-28x-37x, 26-42x, 36-31, 42-26x
(2) 2-35, 28-19, etc.
Mats
Re: Killer draughts
Oh, I see my mistake. I thought that black on 36 moved upwards. (Anyway, the variants are correct, if that were the case.) I will check this again.Rein Halbersma wrote: Could you please use normal notation? I don't understand: after 2-7 28-32 7-11 27-22 11x37 26x42 it's a draw, right? Black plays 36-41 (not 36-31)
Mats
Re: Killer draughts
Ok, I've now run this again. I set the program to play against itself. Notice that this win is perhaps overly long-winded. After all, computers don't like the motif of sacrificing two kings for one piece. Perhaps there is a neater win.
2-7, 28-32, 7-11, 27-18, 11-50, 26-42, 50-39, 42-47, 39-50, 47-20, 50-44, 32-19, 44-11, 19-23, 11-39, 18-1, 39-6, 20-15, 36-41, 23-46x, 6-22, 46-14, 22-39, 1-18, 39-44, 18-29, 44-22, 14-28, 22-33x-24x, 15-47x 1-0
Mats
2-7, 28-32, 7-11, 27-18, 11-50, 26-42, 50-39, 42-47, 39-50, 47-20, 50-44, 32-19, 44-11, 19-23, 11-39, 18-1, 39-6, 20-15, 36-41, 23-46x, 6-22, 46-14, 22-39, 1-18, 39-44, 18-29, 44-22, 14-28, 22-33x-24x, 15-47x 1-0
Mats
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Killer draughts
Thanks! Btw, is this nonstandard noitation forced by Zillions of Games? Instead of eg 23-46x, the PDN standard mandates 23x46.MLWi wrote:Ok, I've now run this again. I set the program to play against itself. Notice that this win is perhaps overly long-winded. After all, computers don't like the motif of sacrificing two kings for one piece. Perhaps there is a neater win.
2-7, 28-32, 7-11, 27-18, 11-50, 26-42, 50-39, 42-47, 39-50, 47-20, 50-44, 32-19, 44-11, 19-23, 11-39, 18-1, 39-6, 20-15, 36-41, 23-46x, 6-22, 46-14, 22-39, 1-18, 39-44, 18-29, 44-22, 14-28, 22-33x-24x, 15-47x 1-0
Mats
Re: Killer draughts
Oh, I invented the notation myself. I will keep to PDN in the future.
Evidently, this key position is a win in killer-light. So it is looking good.
Mats
Evidently, this key position is a win in killer-light. So it is looking good.
Mats
Re: Killer draughts
I have now checked the position with Killer Draughts, by letting my Killer Draughts program play against itself. Then the win becomes kind of trivial:
2-7, 28-5, 7-29, 27-18, 29x12, 26x8, 36-41, 5x46 1-0
Perhaps this is an argument in favour of Killer Light, because we don't want trivial wins, do we?
Mats
2-7, 28-5, 7-29, 27-18, 29x12, 26x8, 36-41, 5x46 1-0
Perhaps this is an argument in favour of Killer Light, because we don't want trivial wins, do we?
Mats
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Killer draughts
3 kings vs 1 king is indeed trivial in Killer. 2 kings vs 1 king + 1 man is slightly more complicated, and 1 king + 1 man vs 1 king + 1 man can be quite complicated. Similarly for 3 vs 3 endgames with 1 or 2 kings for both sides. In general, Killer is highly complicated for almost-balanced games, where small differences in tempo, opposition and control of crucial squares/diagonals all play a role. I wouldn't judge Killer vs Killer-light on the basis of 3 vs 1.MLWi wrote:I have now checked the position with Killer Draughts, by letting my Killer Draughts program play against itself. Then the win becomes kind of trivial:
2-7, 28-5, 7-29, 27-18, 29x12, 26x8, 36-41, 5x46 1-0
Perhaps this is an argument in favour of Killer Light, because we don't want trivial wins, do we?
Mats
OTOH, it is indeed good news that Killer-light is also won for these 3 vs 2 endgames, and also in 4 vs 2 endgames that are typically drawn in regular draughts.
Re: Killer draughts
My Killer-light program can't find a win.Rein Halbersma wrote: I would be willing to try Killer-light but only if it can be shown that e.g. post-Scouppe endgames like this win:
Draw in regular draughts, win in Killer. Result in Killer-light?
Mats
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Killer draughts
The win might be too deep. The strategy here is to bring piece on <24> to <15>, then the black king has to be at <37> and then white sacrifices 1 king with 27-31! 37x26 and gets the long diagonal with 16-32. Then the piece at <15> can be promoted, and after that the piece on <47> which leads to the winning 3 vs 2 engame. The promotions alone will take at least 13 moves (so 26 ply search). With all the tactics involved, it could be that the longest defense takes over 50 plies.MLWi wrote:My Killer-light program can't find a win.Rein Halbersma wrote: I would be willing to try Killer-light but only if it can be shown that e.g. post-Scouppe endgames like this win:
Draw in regular draughts, win in Killer. Result in Killer-light?
Mats
-
- Posts: 4245
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 22:11
Re: Killer draughts
http://www.ericsdamsite.com
http://www.thailandopen.nl
http://dammen.startpagina.nl
http://www.thailandopen.nl
http://dammen.startpagina.nl
Re: Killer draughts
the Match in a game Go between the best human Lee Sedol and Google-programme AlphaGo provoke a very big interest in the World.
Artificial intelligence is wiining 2-0 for the moment.
In draughts such matches passed imperceptibly...
Now it is clear: human can not beat computer, but able to draw.
What about Killer-draughts?
is it possible for Human to draw the Match against the best Programme?
Artificial intelligence is wiining 2-0 for the moment.
In draughts such matches passed imperceptibly...
Now it is clear: human can not beat computer, but able to draw.
What about Killer-draughts?
is it possible for Human to draw the Match against the best Programme?
http://ru.pokerstrategy.com/#uS7UG6
Lets play Poker, to get for free 50$
Lets play Poker, to get for free 50$