![Image](http://draughts.nl/tools/13925867269.gif)
Pim Meurs
Ik had laatst een bijna-dood-ervaring. Ik probeerde de stand van Hermelink weer op te zetten met die verrukkullukke onmogelijke zet 28-22??!!!Eric van Dusseldorp wrote:Als eerste zet is 28-22 inderdaad niet onaardig. Kingsrow speelt ad rem (23-29), denkt dan enkele minuten na en barst vervolgens in snikken uit.Kosmos wrote:
Hermelink & Polman
Deze forcing is toch wel verrukkulluk... Het is toegestaan kreten van bewondering te slaken!
32-28 (21-26) 31-27 (16-21) 27x16 (20-25) en wat nu?
Misschien moet partijproblematiek geherdefinieerd worden.
The motive is nice! But, but... *red* to move? You have truly gone over to the dark checkers siderusms wrote: Red to move.
Remember - I reside in USA and play Anglo-American Checkers. Here we are using "red" instead "black" -Rein Halbersma wrote:The motive is nice! But, but... *red* to move? You have truly gone over to the dark checkers siderusms wrote: Red to move.
rusms wrote:Remember - I reside in USA and play Anglo-American Checkers. Here we are using "red" instead "black" -Rein Halbersma wrote:The motive is nice! But, but... *red* to move? You have truly gone over to the dark checkers siderusms wrote: Red to move.
just politically-correctnessI can refer you to many hundred checkers books written in last 200 years. 99% of them are using "red" instead "black"
But I can accept your remark. In Europe it is in common to write "black"
Opps !!! Getting olderRein Halbersma wrote:I tried to make a word joke...![]()
Een fraaie forcing:Arjen wrote:
A.T. / DP December 2007 / 10x10