As published on the site of Belarussian Draughts Federation:
http://belarus.fmjd.org/modules/news/ar ... toryid=271
The Statement of Anatoli Gantvarg - the member of the financial commission of the FMJD.
After seing the statement of Mr.Hildering from 31.08.2007 I think it is
necessary to come up with the answer statement because of two reasons:
first - Mr.Hildering had used my name negatively,
second – I can not leave it as is because the unlawful decisions of
the CD and Mr. Hildering can provoke a similar decisions in the future.
Mr.Hildering reports that I have been excluded by the CD from the
financial commission of FMJD.
If such a decision has been taken (there is nothing about it in the
Minutes of CD) then I have to explain to the CD members that the
Executive committee has the name "Executive" because it execute the
decisions of the supreme organ of the FMJD – General Assembly. I had
been chosen by the GA for two years and only the GA can exclude me.
The fact that people exclude the member of financial commission
controlling themselves says that they do not understand the absurdity
and illegality of their decisions.
According to the Statutes only the GA can exclude or include somebody
to FMJD, it means that the excluding of the national Russian
Federation and including to the FMJD Regional Russian Federation by
Mr.Hildering was also absolutely illegal. His statements that his
punitive decisions are being later accepted by the GA are absolutely
wrong. In democratic states judge comes first and punishment later,
and not another way around.
In the case of necessity of quick decision there is a special
procedure of calling of the emergent GA written in Statutes .
If Mr.Hildering thinks that his activity in excluding from commissions
of the FMJD and from the FMJD is so necessary for the life of the FMJD
then the CD should call the Extraordinary GA to solve this problem.
The question about my exclusion seems to be a mystery. Who from the
members of CD and when took this illegal decision is kept in secret.
Even I and the FMJD members were not informed about the decision.
Now about the financial question.
Mr.Hildering always says that the last financial account of Mr Bus for
2003-2005 was accepted by the GA and on the base of it the financial
commission didn't have a right to check these years. If it has been
done, such decision is invalid. From my report at GA2005 and decision
about the account (2003-2005) we can see that it didn't satisfy the
demands and was against at least 5 points of the Statutes and
Bye-Laws.
Because it happened not once I must explain that the questions
contradicting to the Statutes cannot be voted. If all the questions
could be decided by vote then the laws would have no sense.
It is also strange to me to have to explain that if the control
organs found the financial violation they have the right to call the
papers out of any time. While we are speaking now about just the last
one.
Mr.Hildering says that the estimation of financial group Tamek closes
the financial question of 2003-2004.
We are getting a funny picture.
The CD and the Treasurer don't have to show the budget and report as
it is demanded by the Statutes. It is enough to go to group Tamek
that says that it makes not audit but some review. This review is
clearly done without looking into the Statutes, Bye-Laws and the
budget of the FMJD.
Just the same we can say about the financial audit of Mr.Zioltkowski
(2006-2007). How can Mr.Zioltkowski come with positive statement if he
has not seen the budget (it doesn't exist) and the report of
treasurer?
Did Mr.Zioltkowski also cancelled the demands of the Statutes and Bye Laws?
Concerning the amount of 102 000 Euro, not reported by the Treasurer,
it can be recalculated very easy.
Let's just take the regulations of the World and European championships,
where the tournament fees are mentioned multiply it with the number of
participants. After it we will sum up these amounts.
As not only Gantvarg with his diploma in math but a pupil of basic
school can do it then the financial group Tamek can hardly deflate the
sum received as result of so simple calculations.
This is exactly the amount that the Treasurer should report according
to the Statutes, Bye-Laws and budget. He didn't do it.
This situation is reflected in my report for the GA.
It would be even easier if Mr. Hildering would attract independent
auditor to realize a full audit as he promised in his letter to
Belarussian federation 3,5 years ago but never did.
In any case the GA has to study the report of the members of financial
commission and to take decisions according to the Statutes and
Bye-Laws of the FMJD
Anatoli Gantvarg, the member of the financial commission of FMJD.
Statement of Anatoli Gantvarg
-
Jacques PERMAL
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 09:15
- Location: ROUEN - NORMANDY
