As Ed said, 9 pieces are entirely doable. It's ~13 core years. If you have 64 cores and 256Gb, it's 2-3 months. Although you would need pretty good slicing (not just leading rank) or else you need 384 Gb AFAICS.BertTuyt wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 15:15Rein, I assume that at least from a memory point of view the 9p would be doable-ish.
My guestimate is that 256 GByte would be sufficient, and at least the Threadripper could address this.
Also with Threadripper mother boards with 8 DIMM slots and 32 GByte Dimm seems not to be impossible.
Last but not least the costs for 256 GByte would be between 1000 - 1200 euro.
Certainly expensive, but not totally out of reach (as this is also my wish next PC system, 32 cores)
Bert

Kingsrow - databases
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Kingsrow - databases
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Kingsrow - databases
Ok, I did some more calculations. With a 64-core Threadripper (~$4K) and leading squares indexing, you can do 9 pieces in 90 days and 192 Gb of RAM. You can also do 10 pieces in 2 years and 640 Gb of RAM. All assuming that a threadripper core is pound for pound the equivalent of a Xeon core. If that is a factor 2-4 you're back to square one.
-
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Re: Kingsrow - databases
Rein I have a question. You know computers very well. Does it exist and have you encountered it to connect several computers together so that the computing power is greater.
-
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 16:04
- Contact:
Re: Kingsrow - databases
If you're going down the AMD path, the translation table is roughly this:BertTuyt wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 15:15Rein, I assume that at least from a memory point of view the 9p would be doable-ish.
My guestimate is that 256 GByte would be sufficient, and at least the Threadripper could address this.
Also with Threadripper mother boards with 8 DIMM slots and 32 GByte Dimm seems not to be impossible.
Last but not least the costs for 256 GByte would be between 1000 - 1200 euro.
Certainly expensive, but not totally out of reach (as this is also my wish next PC system, 32 cores)
Bert
Threadripper -> i9 XE
Threadripper Pro -> Xeon W-series [this segment is where Ed's machine is now, and where my old Xeon E5 sat]
Epyc -> scalable Xeon (platinum) [two 8-socket 24 core machines solved 7 piece chess dbs, at $90K each]
The Zen 3 Epyc will become available in Q1 2021, and supports up to 2 sockets of 64 cores each. The older Zen 2 64 core version went at around $7K per processor, but AMD is lowering prices so you might get a 128 core machine for ~10K (no RAM though yet). With such a machine, you could build the 10 pc dbs in a year. If you wait one more generation of processors, it might be for half that amount of money.
-
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Re: Kingsrow - databases
Hi Ed.
Can you write exactly how much all items in the database are 4x4.
Can you write exactly how much all items in the database are 4x4.
-
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 14:53
- Real name: Ed Gilbert
- Location: Morristown, NJ USA
- Contact:
Re: Kingsrow - databases
You can see the sizes of the files using Windows Explorer. The filenames have the total number of pieces and the number of pieces of each type. For example db8-4103 has 8 pieces, 4 black men, 1 black king, 0 white men, and 3 white kings.Krzysztof Grzelak wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 21:40Can you write exactly how much all items in the database are 4x4.
-
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Re: Kingsrow - databases
You misunderstand me. How much position the entire base has 4x4.
-
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 14:53
- Real name: Ed Gilbert
- Location: Morristown, NJ USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 17:16
- Real name: Krzysztof Grzelak
Re: Kingsrow - databases
Thank you Ed.