The 7_th USSR Championyship in Drafts Composition, preliminary results in the "Problems-64" genre "Fomin A. V. No. 131:8x8 1.dc7 A new strike with a hanging checker c5, and before that the whites destroy 2 black kings sacrificing their king. A total of 5 kings are involved in the problem. The initial setup is clearly pretentious, Score 8.5 pointspoints.
No.132 10:10 1.cd2 An interesting new double strike (hg5 and dc5) with the sacrifice of two white kings. The initial setup looks somewhat artificial, but the last moves of white and black gf2(gh4) are quite natural. Score 7.5 points.
A. Fomin , No. 131 ..... ..A.Fomin , No. 132... .. https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17394126488.png
1.dc7 de1 2.ab2 3.ab4 4.cb2 5.cd8 6.6.d8 : g5 h6:f4 7.c5:g5 gf2 8.g:e3 hg1 9.gh6 10. h:f8x
No. 132: https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17394133895.png
1.cd2 2.bc7 3.cd8 4.de7 5.h:g5 6.d:c5 7.a:c5 x
IMG_20250213_044031_675.jpg (786.51 KiB) Viewed 14295 times
A. Fomin , №133...
No. 133 : 1.hg7 2.gf2 3.gf8 4.f:h6 5.ef2 6.h:d2 x 1 hg7 2 gf2 3.gf8 4.f:h6 5.ef2 6.h:d2 x
An original mechanism with a twist. The finale is rare for a miniature. Score : 6.5 points
...A. Fomin , №134......A.Fomin , №135.... ...
№134 (9 points) : 1..bc7 2.ab6 3.ab2 4. cd8 5.d:b6:f2 6.gf2 7.bc3 9.c:g5 10.h:f8 fe5 12.fe7 ed4 13.df6 de3 14.hg7 ef2 15.fd8 16.d:e1 x №134: Interesting winning techniques are beautifully combined into a single combination mechanism, ending with a bright old motif. The assesment of the 19th All Soviet Union Competition of 1985 and the match of hero cities is preservedpreserved(9 points).
№135 1.gf4 2.f:b4 3.d:b4 4.fe3 5.ed2 6. gf2 7. h:b8 x
Masterful processing of the idea of V. Abaulin and L. Shekhmeister - from an excellent arrangement of checkers with a bright move 2.f:b4! Punching of the d6-field, a sacrifice of the white king is added. All checkers participate in the game. and the best finale is in the asset. The assestment of the 19-th All-Soviet Union contest 7.5 points is preserved.
IMG_20250213_064252_15.jpg (343.2 KiB) Viewed 14282 times
№136 A. Fomin (9 points)
one of the most difficult problems of the championship, where the original mechanism of destroying the black king is shown in the main variant. The score of the 19th All Soviet Union contest of 9 points has been retained. In reality , the average score of 9.5 points in the 19th All Soviet Union contest was lowered by its chief judge of A. Fedoruk - note by the author of the article.
№137 A. Fomin, 8 points https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17395967627.png
[
1bc7 e1 2.ab6 3.ab8 4.b:g3 5.a:e7 6.h:d2' 7.cd2 8.gf2 9.h:f2 ab6 10.ab2 bc5 11.bc3 hg7 12.fe3/g3 x
"The complex idea is technically flawlessly executed. The blow 4.b:g3 is unique! Minor flaws, in particular the inequality of forces of the parties, are compensated by the scale of the work. The score of the contest Odessa 1985 8.5 points. has been preserved", - A. Vinderman This score caused panic on the part of the chief judge of the 7th USSR championship A. Fedoruk, who reduced this score by half a point and gave a score of 8 points in the cchampionship's finale "round".-comment by author of this article .
№138 A. Fomin , 8 points
1 gh2 2.hg7 3.gf8 4 d:d8 b:b2 5.d:b6 a:c5 6.b:e3 f:d4 7.a:c7 b:d6 8.f:c5 9.a:c5 hg7 10.cd6 gf6 11.dc7 fe5 12.cd8 ed4 13.df6/a5 de3 14.fc3 - E. van Embden, 1785 ef2 15,cd4 fe1 A 16.df2 17.h:f4 x A 15...(fg1), 16.da7 hg3 17.h:f4 gh2 18.a7 x
The author has excellently reworked his composition from the 5th USSR Championship, 1983. The assessment of the 13th Moscow Championship, 1986 8 points has been preserved.
№139 A. Fomin, 7 points
1.hg3 2.gh2 3.gh4 4.hg3 a:c5 5.ef2 6.cb2 7.gf4 8.h:h8 9.hf6 10.h:b8 x
" A. Vinderman wrote: "The destruction of two black kings by the blow h6:b8 (even without sacrificing the white king) has probably not been achieved compositionally by anyone before.
The problem has predecessors В. Solny'kov and M. Ben. It's a pity that the initial arrangement is bad, and the assignment is a draw. The score is 7 points ".
№140 A. Fomin (draw) , 7 points https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17395703165.png
1.bc7 2.cd8 3.db6 4 .fe3 5.c:g5 6.bc5 7.a:c3 8.bf2 9.h:h6 x
"The assestment of this problem from the Odessa-1984 contest has been retained".
*******************************************************
*******************************************************
IMG_20250216_033741_457.jpg (200.54 KiB) Viewed 14028 times
...............................A.Fomin ................................ .....
1.d8 > [I. Timkovsky,"Gudok",1927] 2. df6 g5 A 3.a1 e3 4.c3 f2 5.d4 x A(c1), d8, g3, e1 x
1.d8 b2 2.g7 3.df6 g5 A 4.a1 4.c3 etc. x-E. van Embden, 1785
A(c1), d8, g3, e1 x
1.gf4 bc5 2.d:b4 a:c3:3.ed8 etc. x
*********************************
IMG_20250216_221326_94.jpg (331.17 KiB) Viewed 13962 times
IMG_20250221_200353_304.jpg (463.01 KiB) Viewed 13719 times
14_th Moscow championship in drafts composition -1987
Yu. Cherniaev
bc3 e1, gf2, gf4 etc x
Score is 6 points
IMG_20250221_112623_145.jpg (273.71 KiB) Viewed 13720 times
IMG_20250221_203845_122.jpg (344.42 KiB) Viewed 13711 times
IMG_20250224_095356_277.jpg (317.92 KiB) Viewed 13648 times
IMG_20250224_095836_334.jpg (286.86 KiB) Viewed 13646 times
In the initial position, Y. Chernyaev pointed out a false trail in the decision , likely counting on increasing the judge's score: 1 bc7 ab6! 2.c:a7 a:c5 3 d:b4 b:d6 4.ab8 etc. =however, the judge of section A Vinderman, according to his report to the chief judge A. Fedoruk, made a request to the author: "how to achieve a draw as black after 4.cd4! and Chernyaev sent an erroneous analysis 4...fe1 5.ba5 ef6? and the judge continued the decision 6.fg5 ! f:h4:7.ab8 x Chernyaev was forced to admit defeat.
******************************
Fomin A.
ed4, ce3, fd4, hf2, ge3 cb6, ef4 bc5 , db6 a:c7, fg5 hg7, ab4 cb6, ed2:
bc5 A , gh6 ca3, hb4, ac5 dc3 x A(de5), ba5 gh6, ac7 h:f4, cb8 x
S. Khottabychev -A. Fomin
1.cd4 hg5 2.gh4 gh6 3.fg3 de5 4.gf4 g3 5.hf2 gf4 6.eg5 hf4 7.fg3 hg7 8.ge5 bc5 9.db6 ac5 10.hg3 fd4 11.gh4 ed6 12.ef2 gh6 13.de3 de5 14.cd2 cb4 15.a:c5 d:b6 16.fg3 fe7 17.dc3 cd6 18.gf4 eg3 19.hf2 ef6 20.fg3 ba5 21.gh4 bc7 22.gf2 dc5 23.fg3 cd6 24.ed4 ? ce3 [24.ba3=]25.cb4 ac3 26.bf2 fe5! 27.fe3 dc5 28.gf4 eg3 29.hf2 cb4 30.ab2:hg5 31.fg3 de7! 32.gf4 ba3 33.fh6 ag5 34.hf4 ef6 x
this idea previously there was published in the book by Z. I. Tsirik: "Russian checkers", 1953
Tsirik Z. I., 1953
Z. Tsirik :1.jg5 etc. x
***********************************
№1270 : arranged by A. Fomin, I.P. is A. Mazyatis, 1989 https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1715-topic#80106
"evening bell from the D. K. "
Message by Fomin Mon Jan 27, 2025 7:43 am
1.fg7 h:f8 2.de7 b:d6 3..ba5 d:b4 4.a:c5 f:b4 5..a:e5 ab6
6.ef6 bc5 7.fg7 cd4 8.gh8 de3 9.-E.van Embden, 1785 hc3 ef2
10.cd4 fe1 11.df2 e:g3 12.h:f4 x
......A.Fomin.....
1.de5 f:d4 2.cd2 a:c5 3.de3 f:d2 4.e:c7 cd4 A 5.cb8 dc3 6.be5 cd2 7.ec3 d:b4 8.a:c3 ef6 B 9.cd4 fg5 C 10.de5 gf4 11.e:g3 x
A.Fomin - Ashot Tundravelian
Screenshot_20250310-195647.jpg (392.77 KiB) Viewed 12834 times
Whites won.
S. Maltsev: received by the editorial board of "64" on September 29, 1975 for publication (taken by the author of these lines from the notebook of A. Fedoruk in 1981)
b2, ef4, etc. x
*****************************
7_th USSR championship on drafts composition -1989/1990
There was played before in practical party :A.Fomin -Sh. Krysin, 1975 .
1.bc7 b:d6 2.de5 3.e:e7 d:f6 4.dc3 5.fg5 6.g:e7 7.h:e1 fg3 8.ea5 9.bc3 10.a:e1 ab6 11.ef2 ba5 12.fe1 x
This " problem " looks like an improvement of ideological predecessor (Anatoly Ny'ch :
4th Minsk Region Chmpionship, 2006 ).
№1275(2)
1.bc5 2.fg5 3.g:e7 4.h:e1 fg3 5.ea5 6.bc3 7.a:e1 ab6 8.ef2 ba5 9.fe1 x
Information about the I.P. came from G. Andreev .
................. S. Pupkin.................... https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17430380928.png https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17431322043.png ...
I ab4 c:a5 2.ba3 h:f2 3.g:c5 ef6 A 4.cd6 fg5 5.dc7 gf4 6.cb8 fe3 - S. Pupkin - P. Tushinvorsky,1985 7.bh2 ! cd2 B 8.ab2 dc1 9.bc3 cg5 10.ge3 g:b4 11.a:c5 x A (ab4) 4.cd6 e:c5 5.ab2 x B 7...(ef2) 8.hg1 (fe1) 9.ab2 (eh4) 10.gf2 h:e1 11.bc3 e:b4 12.a:c5 x
II 1.gf6 g5 2.h:b4 a:c5 > S. Pupkin, 1973 3.gf2! ed4 A 4.gf4 dc3 B 5.fe3 cb4 6.fe5 ba3:7.ed6 ab2 8.ed4 c:c7 9.a:c3 x A (cd4), 4.ab2 x
B 4...cb4 5.fe5 d:f6 6.ab2 fe5 7.fe3 ba3 8.bc3 x
...A. Fomin.... https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17430656428.png
17430656428.png (5.35 KiB) Viewed 1450 times
A. Fomin - Ashot Tundravelian
A3>F4 , A7 >C5
Blacks made a gross mistake10...fg7 ?? After the move 10...de5 ! 11.f:d6 c:e5 the game could have ended in a draw.
f8, d6 a3:e7, f:h2 , hg3, c1 x
image_handler (96) (19).png (5.97 KiB) Viewed 1091 times
Previously met :: M. Tsvetov
"64" - 41 -1979, 4th USSR championship - 6.5 points
de3.a5:c3,f4,a:c7,a3 +
A. Fomin, №672
1.gf6 e:g5 2. c:e7 a:c5 3.ed4 c:e3 4.ed8 de1 5.d:h4 e:g5 6.h:a5 e:h4 7.gf2 h:e1 8.cd2 e:c3 9.a:d2/e1 x
image_handler (96) (17).png (6.04 KiB) Viewed 1180 times
**********************
..........................S.Pupkin ...................... ..
1.hg5 2.f6 3.d2 4.de3 5.c5 hg5 6.g3 7.e3 h4 8.f4 x
1.gf2 2.cb2 3.gf6 4.d2 5.fe3 6.е5 fe7 7.c3 x
A. Fomin - Ashot Tundravelian
D. No. 1 : In this position, White s played 10.ef2 ! with his next move.
D. No. 2 : 20.hg5 ! is the best move, after 20.ba5 White s could also make a draw, but in this case they would be left without one checker...20... f:h4 21.ba5 etc. = ...
*****************************
V. G. Stepanov: "Evening Petersburg, №2 , 04/22/1996 (16-th City Championship)
bc7 , cb2, g5, f8 (ac1), b2, d6, d6 (a7), c7 x
Stepanov V.&Slobodyanyuk V.
A. Balanyuk , A. Malyuta "Odessa School of Drafts Composition" Cherkassy [680], 2011
1.ef8 axe7 2.fxd8 hxh4 3.gf2 exg1 4.ab6 axc5 5.fxe3 dxf2 6.ed2 cxe1 7.da5 ed2 8.axe1 x 2-0
image_handler (96) (24).png (5.15 KiB) Viewed 804 times
https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1567p350-topic#73445
Idea from the game I. V. Timkovsky-B. Kazaris, Moscow championship, 1932 *)
*)№855 processing by A. Fomin : ab2 ba3, gf2, cd4, b4, ef2, ed4, dc5, gh4, h:h4 x
B. Gavrilov - A. Fomin( memorial tournament dedicated to the remembrance of B. L. Vinogradov) , April , of 13 , 2025
Time control: five minutes per game with time addition according to R. Fischer's system - three seconds for each move.
After 27th move dc3 Whites offered a draw, which was accepted.
A. Ayupov (Sverdlovsk region)
[Publshed in the book by G. Khatskevitch, "25 lessons of drafts game", 1979, p. 176 ] https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17447337712.png
1.hg5 f:h4 2.ef6 g:e5 3.f:b8 bc1 4.ed2;c:e1 5.ed4 c:g1 6.be5 h:f2 7.ec3 b:d2 8. ab2 x
17447337712.png (5.14 KiB) Viewed 708 times
a simplified version was previously published (magazine "Shashki" 1969 No. 5 d. No. 645)
1.cb8 (c1) 2.ed2 3. ed4 4.be5 5.ec3:6.ab2 x
Fomin A.
Contest «Odessa-1974» , 5 points.
1.b4-c5
[ 1.g3-f4? e5xg3 2.h2xf4xd2 f6-g5 3.h4xf6xd8 b6-a5 4.d8xb6 a7xc5xe3xc1= ]
1...e3xg1 2.h4-g5 f6xh4xf2 3.d4xf6xd8 b6xd4xb2 4.d8xb6 a7xc5 5.a1xc3 x 2-0
Fomin A.
«Gudok», 06/06/1977, Contest «Odessa-1978» , 5.5 points [327], 1978 https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17448085982.png
1.a1-b2 c5-d4 2.e:e7 g5:g1 3.e:g5 g:g1 4.bc3 a:c5 5.cd4 c:e3 6.ef2 7.c:e3 x
A. Fomin, newspaper « Star », Minsk, Nov., of 12 , 1977 https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17447345063.png
ed6 (de1), dc7 (b:d6), de5 (f:d4), e:e7 (g:g1), ed8 (h:f2), de7 (f:d6), h:b4 (a:c3), cd2(cb2), a:c3 x
image_handler - 2025-05-04T202137.098.png (7.32 KiB) Viewed 238 times
1.bc3 bd2 2.ab8 ge1 3.b:g3 h:f2 4.ef8 -N. Vergeitchik , 2010 ab4 A
5.f:a3 dc3 6.a3-b2 x A (dc3), 5.fb4 cb2 6.a:c3 x https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17465262443.png
S. Pupkin
1.bc3 2.de7 bb4 /f:b4 3.a:c5 4.h:a3 5.a3:c3 x
17465262443.png (5.25 KiB) Viewed 150 times
17465266925.png (5.22 KiB) Viewed 150 times
Second solution : 5.a:c5 6.d:d8 [ the variant 6.d8 :g3 is also possible with a big advantage for whites after 6...ef6 7.ge1 ++ - - (3-d solution)] ef2 7.hg5 fe1 8.gh6 etc. x
A. Fomin (Brazilian checkers) > for self solution..... Fragment of the Brazilian composition ..............................
S.Pupkin - N. N.
1.bc3 2.a:c1 ed2 A - variation from the game 3.c:e3 dc5 4.ed4 5.gf4 6.h:f6 x
A (dc5), f4 , f6 (cd4), cd2 x
..........A. Fomin..................№818 (2) :................№818 (3) :........... ....
1.ed6 c:e5 2.f:f8 h:d2:3.hg7 h:f6 4.g:e7 d:f6 5.hg5 /fd6 f:h4 6.fd6/hg5 c:e7 7.fg3 h:f2 8.g:a7 ed6 9.ab8.de5 10.b:f4 /h2 x
I. P. is A. Fomin :17.06.2023 ...Some time later ............
№818 (2) : 1.ba3 2.ed8 3.d:c5 4.a:e7 xx
There was known before :№818(3) : viewtopic.php?f=60&t=7659&start=75#p129896
Re: Compositions at 64-cell board
Post by FOMIN » Sun Sep 13, 2020 06:56
-----------------------------
I. P. is A. Lentochkin :" Dambtete -2-1990. "
[ indicated by Alexander Polevoy (Israel)]
1.cb8 3. bd6 3.b:e5 4.bc5 5.a:c3 x
----------------------------
A. Fomin
1.ba3 2.ab4 3.ab2 4.gh2 5.g:e7 6.h:g3 cd6 7.g:c7 b:d6 8.hg3 ed2 dc5 a 9.c:e3 dc5 10.gf4 e;g5 12.h:f6 cd4 13. cd2 x
a (ed2), c:e3(dc5), ed4 (c:e3), gf4, h:f6 x
A. Fomin (correction)
legality of the initial checkers construction: ed4(fg3), dc5(b:d4)
Solution: d8, g7 , dg5! , dc3, e7, b2, f8, h4 (c7) ,g3(b6),f2(a5 ),e1 (g5) d2 (h4),e1x
There was a typo on this forum: black checker "b8" was on the square a7.
*****************************
S. Pupkin
c3, e7, fe3 c5 A, ed4, gf4, h:h8 x
A (gf6), ed4 (de5), dc5 x
...
.
..
...
..
...
....
.
...
..
..
.
..
....
...
..
f:h4 ab6 9) hf2 ba5 10) fe1 hg5 11) ed2 gh4 12) de1 ab4 13) e:a5 hg3 14) ab6 gh2 15) bg1 x 
..............................
..
..
............
