Compositions at 100-cell board by Andrew Fomin

[FOMIN]

...... ............ .. A.Fomin.............. ... . .

1.2 2 44 3.43 4.16 5.7 6.45 6 7. 7 11 8. 16 9.11 45 10. 50 x

[FOMIN]

https://minietiud.forum2x2.ru/t1408p675-topic#62754
Re: ИнТер...
Posted by Fomin Mon. ,Sept. of 10, 2018 6:58 am
.........,..... ... A.Fomin............................

15397912305.png (8.03 KiB) Viewed 1175 times

A.Fomin , "De problemist " ,No.6,dec.,2020[76]
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16507777123.png

16507777123.png (6.54 KiB) Viewed 1163 times

[FOMIN]

............. .A.Fomin...............
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16513386541.png

16513386541.png (6.01 KiB) Viewed 1151 times

[FOMIN]

Dedicated to the centenary of the birth of the International Arbiter on drafts ,Honored Coach of the USSR
A.I. Vinderman (8.06.1922-2001)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16551281277.png

16551281277.png (6.65 KiB) Viewed 1010 times

30 34 , 22 29:18 , 2 7 ,11, 1 32, 26 , 39 , 27x

https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16555156514.png

16555156514.png (5.69 KiB) Viewed 1010 times

I.p. is I.Mozer,1941, No.88, p.22
1.27 32 2.21 3.40 4.6 37 - I .Mozer , "Het eindspel ",1941 5.6-1 etc. x

[FOMIN]

...................................Yuri Golikov (Tver region)....................................

16568800816.png (72.43 KiB) Viewed 926 times

[Symix]

Непонятно - в форуме предназначенным для русского языка господин Фомин пишет на английском!

[FOMIN]

............A.Fomin...............

1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

[FOMIN]

Снимок (9).JPG (61.93 KiB) Viewed 799 times

..
The other variation looks like this. The proof of the legitimacy of the initial arrangement of checkers is simple:
0)09 4:13 1) 25-20 30:39 etc. x
3rd variant of the etude endgame:
1.4 2.:28 5 3.37 4 .46:47 x

.

16590625379.png (8.44 KiB) Viewed 799 times

**************************************************
***************************************************

............A.Fomin...............

1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

Is this position correct? After 32-28 23x41 34x5 41-46 white wins easily using 17-12.

Dear Mr. Wesselink !
Thank you for your remark.
In solution of this miniature on the second move, Blacks should play (47), which follows from the further solution of it , indicated correctly.
Thus, the correct solution finally looks like this.
1.28 2.05 47 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

[Wieger Wesselink]

............A.Fomin...............

1.28 2.05 46 3.27 4.23 5.16 30 6.43 35 7.49 11 8.44 16 12.49x

Is this position correct? After 32-28 23x41 34x5 41-46 white wins easily using 17-12.

[FOMIN]

.......... A.Fomin ................

16688549546.png (6.85 KiB) Viewed 376 times

..

16641134919.png (6.35 KiB) Viewed 376 times

[FOMIN]

Ju. Golikov (Tver , Russia)
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16728386233.png
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16728834634.png

16728834634.png (4.73 KiB) Viewed 221 times

16728386233.png (4.43 KiB) Viewed 221 times

[FOMIN]

https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/16743067409.png
12 , 1 (45), 40 , 38 , 30 - R.K.Keller's position appears on the board (I.Mozer's book , 1941 , D.No.1080 , p.156 )

16743067409.png (7.32 KiB) Viewed 90 times

**************************

1.27 2.7 - the fragment of I..Mozer position appears on the board(I.Mozer's book , 1941 , D.No.1081 , p.156 )
2... 38 3..02 (18) 4.07 (22) 5.16 (42) 6.27 (22:31) 7.48 x

16743611708.png (5.33 KiB) Viewed 90 times

A.Fomin , 9-th Moscow championship on drafts composition , 1982 (No.No.5-8)

IMG_20230123_114813.jpg (1.41 MiB) Viewed 90 times

******************************

IMG_20230123_155422.jpg (2.07 MiB) Viewed 90 times